>>/203209/
> you used a very weaselly wording
> you said
> >very few of the girls posted there were under 15-16
Don't say it's weaselly wording. Were they or were they not mostly 15+? Were there or were there not a fair amount over 18 (and even more now)? Now maybe I'm wrong (I certainly didn't track every girl's age), but that's the impression I had. It's not an "abject lie," and that hyperbole doesn't serve you well.
> the girl rando was referencing as peak and that he feels something (sexual) towards had no visible sexual characteristics
I'm trying to think if I've ever seen a chip tok of her as an actual child... maybe? But it very likely got deleted. In any case, I don't think prepubescent chip is what people meant by "peak chip," either, so I think you're being disingenuous here.
> has he or hasnt he donated (subs count) to her on twitch
Are we counting subs on twitch as donations? Like, regular self-only subs and not gifted subs? How much do you think that is, in total? Maybe $50 spread over 2-3 years? Do you think that gets you any kind of special treatment? That canthinkynjoyer guy has bought thousands in kick subs and he hasn't even been let in her discord.
> has he or hasnt he been her moderator since she was a minor in her discord and on twitch. has he or hasnt he been active on telegram and on sturdy?
"Active" on telegram is a stretch, but otherwise yes. And?
> she left her family to move in with him, while underage, and autistic, he manipulated her and controlled her via suicide baiting and other schemes
Yeah, pretty bad stuff. That was after she was already there though, as far as I know. Also he's autistic, too, which I think is fair to point out if you're going to imply that she was especially vulnerable because of it.
Still, none of that amounts to grooming: she was 17, not a child, and he was never in a position of authority or trust over her.
> she for sure knew before sico left to britain as sturdymin revealed all the mod 1 and sico connections in his last sturdychan post
You're talking about something that happened in september, which would've been months after kay emailed him. But how is adminny revealing the mod 1/sico connection proof that kay knew rando was mod 1? I think adminny just knew sico and mod 1 were talking increasingly often because she likely told him about it.
> Did kay know about the fact her moderator rando (who was mod 1) groomed sico to live with him in britain, before sico left for britain, and did nothing to stop it? The answer is yes she knew, because it was public knowledge after sturdymin made his posts
Kay and sico were not on good terms at that point and weren't talking. In fact, kay wasn't talking to anyone from the private server from mid-august onward. What's more, rando went basically MIA from the server back in may, so anything anybody knew came through sico, and she tends to be very cagey about what she discusses.
The fact is, the most anyone knew was that sico and rando had something going. If you want to point to one comment rando made to prove that he was some pedro groomer and that everyone who saw it should've known he was a bad guy, I don't know what to tell you. In my world, one person stating a controversial opinion doesn't suddenly negate everything else you've come to know about that person and damn them to hell.