/agatha2/ - E-Girl Purgatory

e-girl gossip & drama


New Reply on thread #6503
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]


thumbnail of 1569089645668.jpg
thumbnail of 1569089645668.jpg
1569089645668 jpg
(550.62 KB, 1080x1080)
thumbnail of 1565236326446.jpg
thumbnail of 1565236326446.jpg
1565236326446 jpg
(110.5 KB, 1080x1080)
thumbnail of 1565127595882.jpg
thumbnail of 1565127595882.jpg
1565127595882 jpg
(152.45 KB, 1080x1350)

thumbnail of 15340304274090.jpg
thumbnail of 15340304274090.jpg
15340304274090 jpg
(631.29 KB, 2048x2043)
thumbnail of 15354722612240.jpg
thumbnail of 15354722612240.jpg
15354722612240 jpg
(297.4 KB, 958x959)
thumbnail of Screenshot_20211024-132910.png
thumbnail of Screenshot_20211024-132910.png
Screenshot... png
(510.2 KB, 480x800)
 >>/6503/
 >>/6504/
haha it's funny I was just thinking about making a post about her here. I thought I was the only one still around who remembered her.
I don't think that was actually her on 8chan, just some larper posting her pics.
She is still on instagram, she looks a lot different now, I think she's a model or something: https://www.instagram.com/chouchofujin_/






























 >>/14489/
you thinking she 'looks' under 18 based on nothing isn't proof of anything. you don't know that she is underage in those pics and yet you state it like it's a fact, when in reality you have no clue how old she is in any of these pics and are just pulling shit out of your ass. probably the same retard who tries claiming every nude posted here is 'forbidden' even when we know for a fact they're 18+. stop projecting your pedrophilia and forbidden obsession onto everyone else. there is literally no reason to assume she's underage in those pics.





 >>/14495/
She was 14 in early 2019, so she’d be 17 or 18 now. Probably not even 18. Nudes have been deleted here before when the age wasn’t verifiable, and in this case there’s no way she was an adult in those pictures because her entire look has been completely different for a few years now. I’m not sure why people are being so aggressively defensive over this. The burden of proof is on *you* to prove she is not underage in these photos, but in any case, it’s obvious that she is considering she has not looked like that in years, and is possibly still underage right now as well.

 >>/14498/
> She was 14 in early 2019
definitely not lmao. i mean that is just so blatantly untrue i can't even take anything you say seriously after that
> and is possibly still underage right now as well.
she is literally in her 20s now. you have no clue what you're talking about lmao





thumbnail of 39dx8.jpg
thumbnail of 39dx8.jpg
39dx8 jpg
(279.67 KB, 1029x1232)
thumbnail of Ajd82.jpg
thumbnail of Ajd82.jpg
Ajd82 jpg
(201.61 KB, 993x975)
If you're trying to convince yourself that nudes of this kid are actually of an adult, you're genuinely delusional and you've never interacted with children outside of viewing porn of them on image boards. If you interacted with children in any non porn way you'd know this is obviously someone extremely young.......
She even said she was 13/14 and it was never a secret. Some of you make it too obvious that you spent your whole life shut inside watching porn. If you argue that this is an adult, you're a retard




 >>/14507/
> everyone knew
no, everyone didn't 'know' anything about this girl, considering all those retards thought she was actually the one posting there
 >>/14508/
> She even said she was 13/14
'she' never said this. to say it once more this girl never posted on these boards. if you ever thought that larper with the ridiculously exaggerated 'teenage girl' posting style who only ever posted pics that had already been posted elsewhere was actually her then you are legitimately fucking braindead.

















Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


61 replies | 29 file
New Reply on thread #6503
Max 20 files0 B total