/ancap/ - Anarcho Capitalism

board is slow but I want an IB to discuss ancap, ;_;

it's time for a snek png
(250.24 KB, 500x490)

you stupid niggers aren't dying on me, let the snek roam free

I would love 2 but it's currently impossible. The micronation is facing troubles with Croatia and Serbia who claim that Liberland is there illegally (even though the land that Liberland is using is unclaimed). The Serbian police is constantly on the borders of Liberland and attempt 2 arrest any1 who enters it (the president of Liberland has actually been arrested a few times like this). Until the whole BS with Croatia and Serbia is resolved, moving 2 Liberland is impossible.

Tyranny leads to anarchy.

The world will soon go full Mad Max.

Obeying the law is easy when only murder and theft are illegal, but no can obey the law if everything is illegal.

What can you do when fireworks are illegal, but firecrackers are mandatory?

Who will enforce the law when the government cannot pay the Gestapo?

Who will enforce the law when the Gestapo are abolished?

Why would cops defend the state when the Gestapo must wear masks and get dangerous vaccines?

 >>/38/
 >>/38/

ANARCHY WILL REIGN

Is Rand Paul the only American who still cares about freedom?

https://www.godlikeproductions.com/

The world used to be divided between the free West and the unfree East. Later only the USA was a free country. Now half of the US hates freedom. Soon just Southern New Hampshire will be free. Later the Libertarians will need to buy a sailboat to be free or flee and scatter to the Sahara, Siberia, and the Amazon and wait to be hunted down by tyrannical Nazis and Commies.

 >>/37/
 >>/37/

libertarians are hunted by every gov i think us and them are extremly similar

Everything is illegal, everyone is a criminal, everyone is under surveillance 24/7, and no one cares.

Living in a police state means that you must live in dread of being arrested. You can't help feeling hopeless.

Lets say u made an ancap country. Yes, the borders would be open and any1 could technically come inside and destroy everything. But lets say there's a big company in ur ancap country that constantly makes deals with the US. That company helps USA's economy, do u rly think they would attack ur ancap country when its existence helps the US? (I keep using USA as an example but rly it could be with any country).

 >>/27/
Economic relationships didn't stop WW1. I mean it's always a good idea to have another layer of protection in form of financial losses on part of the assailant but if it's the only card they have that ancap territory (can ancaps even form countries?) could simply get subjugated in one way or another and provide the service at terms primarily beneficial to the stronger partner, most likely having to surrender some freedoms as well.
There isn't exactly much land that doesn't have some state's claim on it. Getting an entire existing state to go full anarchy is a tad unrealistic. You can convince a local population but seceding will, even if done peacefully, destabilize the area and is going to hard to legitimize. Not that nothing even remotely similar was ever achieved eg. Switzerland but there's enough to suggest they had Templar military and monetary support and those were simpler times.

The very same Americans who scream that they hate the police state then turn around and support the police.

WTF?

 >>/43/
ye there kinda hippocrates

Wow.

Americans think North America was uninhabited in 1491.