/g/ - Technolo/g/y

cirno__2 jpg
(78.5 KB, 850x605)

The other side bans us and deletes our words in every area they can. They attempt to fire us (sorry: we don't have programmer jobs: we are hackers and NEETs: we code for pleasure: not danegeld) We wonder what happens when words cannot be spoken?

Bascially it's libertarians vs "correctly-thinking" americans. C vs Rust.
Neets vs Wage-workers.
Hackers vs Corps (but I repeat myself).

We wanted a world where we had freedom. To have the freedoms that men of the ancient times had. And we, who defend you, agree with the statements you recanted under pressure.

(For the record: one of the projects I contribute to (fully free-software) is ChaosEsque:Anthology (3d FPS with over 200 weapons, and procedural generation of cities with building interiors), and we've added a statement of support to our project page on moddb in support of you and your rights, we also battle in the forums, we have also been signed to the support letter)

9xqy0s04r3jz jpg
(70.67 KB, 720x604)

(in response to:)
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> 
> I appreciate your moral support.
> Would you like to support me in a practical way?
> 
> 
> You could post for me in public forums where people
> are arguing about this. Especially the ones where my supporters
> are NOT the majority. Stay calm, and avoid name-calling!
> 
> 
> Here are references useful to publicize:
> 
> * To state support.
> 
> People can support me by signing at
> https://codeberg.org/rms-support-letter/rms-support-letter/issues/1
> (It is actually on GitHub, but that codeberg page signs without running
> GitHub's nonfree Javascript code, so my conscience feels better about
> suggesting you sign it.)
> 
> * About me.
> 
> The accusations against me are mainly false -- based on misunderstandings,
> exaggerations and distortions. Plus a few minor things.
> 
> https://blog.dachary.org/2020/02/10/how-the-cancel-culture-was-leveraged-against-rms/
> 
> https://jorgemorais.gitlab.io/justice-for-rms/
> 
> https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/index.html
> 
> * About why they are attacking me.
> 
> https://quillette.com/2021/01/27/beating-back-cancel-culture-a-case-study-from-the-field-of-artificial-intelligence/
> 
> -- 
> Dr Richard Stallman
> Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
> Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
> Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
> 

feriss jpg
(23.3 KB, 300x300)

> However, nonexclusive licenses are revocable (meaning the copyright owner can revoke the license at any time) in the absence of consideration. 
> https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/creating-written-contract-transfer-or-license-rights-under-copyright

>  [...] The most plausible assumption is that a developer who releases 
>  code under the GPL may terminate GPL rights, probably at will.
>  --David McGowan, Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School:

> p278 "Notice that in a copyright dispute over a bare license, the
> plaintiff will almost certainly be the copyright owner. If a licensee
> were foolish enough to sue to enforce the terms and conditions of the
> license, the licensor can simply revoke the bare license, thus ending
> the dispute. Remeber that a bare license in the absence of an interest
> is revocable."
> --Lawrence Rosen
> https://www.amazon.com/Open-Source-Licensing-Software-Intellectual/dp/013148787

Are you actually surprised assholes get kicked off a team? Come on.

xcity1 png
(1.25 MB, 1366x442)

> 01:58  1) Anti-child bride
> 01:58  2) pro-feminism
> 01:58  3) pro-dick-sawing
> 01:58  that would make me happy
> 01:58  to FUCK you pieces of shit enemies over
> 01:58   
> 01:58  good luck in your fight against the entire world
> 01:58  and either way: I have the code: I do not "lose access" to it
> 01:59  it would be removed from anywhere you post it
> 01:59  It's right here on my machines, and on the 100s of dvds/cds/blurays 
>             I have
> 01:59  bones_was_here no it would not
> 01:59  I could simply host it in germany
> 01:59  which has adversarial rules regarding this issue
> 02:00  or any other non-common-law country
> 02:00  if you have free software and the people who write it, 
>                        so much, why don't you just fuck off?
> 02:00  do you understand why you fucking moron?
> 02:00  bones_was_here why would I fuck off?
> 02:00  tell me
> 02:00  why are you so sad as to keep coming back here? are you 
>                        still going to show up and spam your shit when you're 
>                        70? 80?
> 02:00  lying there in hospital dying "ohhh i need a computer so 
>                        i can spam xonotic about pedo shit"
> 02:01  you are a stupid white piece of shit that thinks "durr if I don't 
>             like someone, I shudnt use their things111!!!"
> 02:01  get a life you fucking loser
> 02:01  bones_was_here if I don't have a child bride: I guess I won't have 
>             anything else to do
> 02:01  bones_was_here: you banned me from getting a life, white fuck
> 02:01  you and your kind banned cute young virgin girls for marrying
> 02:03  so you define yourself in terms of whether you're 
>                        permitted to abuse someone with no power to resist


> 02:03  what a pathetic loser
> 02:03  bones_was_here if I don't have a child bride: I guess I won't have 
> 02:03              anything else to do
> 02:04  bones_was_here: you banned me from getting a life, white fuck
> 02:04  'oh woe is me, there's nothing to do but be an asshole 
>                        on the internet, because laws against abuse, bawwww'
> 02:04  you and your kind banned cute young virgin girls for marrying
> 02:04  tell me what is my reason for "getting a life"
> 02:04  which I assume means "work" 
> 02:04  what do I get from that?
> 02:04  enumerate it
> 02:05  there's all kinds of Nice Things, but you just waste 
>                        your existence because you're a bitter loser
> 02:05  the only person you're hurting, is yourself
> 02:05  bones_was_here what "Nice Things" are those?
> 02:05  enumerate ones that I do not posess.
> 02:06  As far as I can tell the only thing I don't have is a child bride.
> 02:06  such has ever been the case.
> 02:06  oh, sorry, am I talking to a wage slave retard here, bones_was_here?
> 02:06  if you had everything, you wouldn't have time to be an 
>                        internet asshole, you'd be too busy enjoying yourself
> 02:06  wrong bones_was_here
> 02:06  when you have everything, you have nothing but time
> 02:07  but a wage slave white fuck wouldn't understand that
> 02:07  when you have everything, you have no time to waste
> 02:07  wrong
> 02:07  but you're sitting at home looking for someone to troll 
>                        while you wait for your welfare payment to arrive

xcity_ png
(1.18 MB, 1176x447)

> 02:07  everything is boring by then.
> 02:08  wellfare? what are you talking about?
> 02:08  home?
> 02:08  I'm on vacation right now.
> 02:08  1/4th the time I'm on vacation, you didn't know that?
> 02:08  most people when on vacation, go somewhere nice
> 02:08  you go to your computer and... spam shit on irc?
> 02:08  I'm at a condo.
> 02:08  wow what a vaction
> 02:09  wish i could be as wealthy as you
> 02:09  since you lust for consumer goods: obviously
> 02:09  see how people with real wealth, are out on their yacht, 
>                        starting a new company, flying into space, buying a 
>                        pacific island
> 02:09  lol
> 02:09  people with real wealth marry little girls
> 02:09  but you? you use your wealth to buy... some time to be 
>                        an internet asshole
> 02:10  it's because you just dream of wealth, you claim it so 
>                        you can talk down to people
> 02:10  since when do I have to buy time? it's the only thing you cannot buy
> 02:10  but you're just a loser in a basement or a trailer park, 
>                        hiding behind a computer
> 02:10  nope: I make things with my own hands: then I talk down to you fags 
>             who just "community organize"


> 02:10  It's the only happiness I have: making things.
> 02:11  fuck off and go make something then
> 02:11  be it in the physical world: such as my marble floors 
> 02:11  or in the design world with the computers
> 02:11  no: I won't fuck off
> 02:11  and if you didn't notice I modeled and added 2 new weapons this and 
>             last week to my fork
> 02:11  amongst various other features
> 02:12  what did you do? fuck all, and WERK'd for a Boss
> 02:12  and if you, white fuck, manage to be married; you have "duh boss" 
>             at home
> 02:12  that's how you white lum live
> 02:13  rejecting the natural pleasures YHWH affords you
> 02:13  warring against all others to banish them
> 02:13  and raise "MUH WUHHHMAN" up as the Power
> 02:13  white piece of SHIT
> 02:14  how can you be so articulate but have so little 
>                        comprehension
> 02:15  Explain what I'm misreading?
> 02:16  1) You are incorrect regarding me "losing access" to the source 
>             code I use: I allready have it and will use it with or without your 
>             permission
> 02:16  2) You are incorrect about me "being on welfare" etc
> 02:17  3) You are incorrect about there being solace found in physical 
>             goods (white wage slaves like you often are: after all you sell 
>             your souls in the fruitless pursuit of such)
> 02:18  nothing to say?
> 02:18  as I thought.
> 02:19  white wagefuck.

FTE dev was mad
https://rbt.asia/g/thread/80439845/#

< eukara> really getting desperate using a russian proxy, why even bother posting when nobody wants to hear what you have to say?
>  you end up banned. every. single. time.
>  I've never been banned
>  anyway I did what you couldn't or wouldn't
>  4 million ents in DP
>  you're fucked in the head, right?
>  suck on it faggot dick chopping-supporter
>  nope
>  clearly
>  I'm a licensed attorney.
>  what are you?
>  prove it
>  you're making a lot of assumptions about others being inferior to you, when you do not know them and you're clearly an egolomaniac
>  but you could never exercise power over another adult, that's why you target kids
>  you disgusting prick
>  you're just as simple to figure out as any other insane person.
>  and clearly you're not a good attorney, because why else have so much time on your hands modding Nexuiz of all things.
>  like wow, no life confirmed!
>  eukara: I'm not like you: I don't have to work.
>  I just do my hobbies
>  because you don't have work.
>  you're a fake.
>  you have accomplished nothing.
>  4 million entities says otherwise.
>  not a single person knows or cares that you exist.
>  and my marble floors say otherwise :)
>  you don't put your real name out, people won't remember your alts.
>  the purpose to do the thing is the thing itself.
>  so 'doing your hobbies' 'not having to work' is worth bragging about, when it's clear you're not doing any goodwill



 > no one cares about 4 million entities in Darkplaces. Nobody sane would ever need that many visible entities.
>  that's unplayable over the network.
>  but you don't care about that. in your little head you think you've figured it all out.
>  and I'm wrong.
>  funnily enough, you used my code from FTE to make this work. So no, you're a talentless, worthless hack.
>  go away.
>  Be a Narcissist in your own 4 walls.
>  ill be with you in a moment
> ~eukara 46.23.94.114 


< starsomething> ill be with you in a moment
>  Glad your mad I used your algo :)
>  pound that sand boy!
>  it just proves you have no talent.
>  you can even revoke the license to use it and sue me :)

cirno_7 jpeg
(250.65 KB, 1448x2048)

cirno__2 jpg
(78.5 KB, 850x605)

 >>/79492216/
> ( silence is consent)
And that's all we hear from the FSF, SFConservancy, Linus, LKML, etc: because they DO agree (effectivly) with Grsecurity.

As Bradly Spengler identified:
>  https://twitter.com/spendergrsec/status/1293155787859206146
> Importantly, neither the FSF nor the SFC, nor in fact any actual lawyer agrees with this bizarre claim from an anonymous troll. More info about the source of the claim can be found here: https://grsecurity.net/setting_the_record_straight_on_oss_v_perens_part1
>  Thanks for doing your part, "Dr" to continue the troll's harrassment

>  >LOL. " #GRSecurity violates both the Linux kernel's copyright and the #GCC #copyright by forbidding redistribution of the patches (in their Access Agreement): which are non-seperable derivative works...

To point out Grsecurity is violating a clause in the GPL, THE CENTRAL CLAUSE (share and share alike): is to be a mysoginist, woman-hating, girl loving, pedo.

So the FSF, SFConservancy, and LKML don't "go" there.

81x0u83lcUL._RI_ jpg
(423.68 KB, 2560x1920)

57_cab623ab-ba... jpg
(43.43 KB, 380x500)

This is about which FOSS devs are making bank off of FOSS. There are TWO(2):

*Linus Trovalds
*Bradly Spengler.

*Linus Trovalds is paid 1.3 million dollars per year likely under contract to forgoe the excercise a legal right he has: to sue violators of his copyright.

If he violated that agreement, (identified) third-party beneficiaries to that contract could attempt to seek to recovery of whatever liquidated damages are specified in that contract.

*Bradly Spengler simply adds a No-Redistribution clause to his linux-kernel patch. As he notes: the FSF and _SFConservancy_ all support him in this (it's 2020, he started doing it years ago, they have said nothing against him)

>  https://twitter.com/spendergrsec/status/1293155787859206146
> Importantly, neither the FSF nor the SFC, nor in fact any actual lawyer agrees with this bizarre claim from an anonymous troll. More info about the source of the claim can be found here: https://grsecurity.net/setting_the_record_straight_on_oss_v_perens_part1
>  Thanks for doing your part, "Dr" to continue the troll's harrassment

>  >LOL. " #GRSecurity violates both the Linux kernel's copyright and the #GCC #copyright by forbidding redistribution of the patches (in their Access Agreement): which are non-seperable derivative works...

They both make millions from leveraging YOUR work. It's a con game.

 >>/79494901/ →
 >>/79493254/ →
>  >If you modify a Work, but then just publish the modifications (ie: "change the word in page X to FOO", "add this paragraph to page Y") that is also a NON-SEPERABLE derivative work, that the Copyright owner of the parent Work you are changing has rights to control/disallow/etc. EVEN THOUGH you might only be distributing your "changes").

> Do you have a source for that claim? That seems pretty strongly at odds from what I've heard about derivative works.

Read a Copyright casebook.
"Oh it's just a claim, bla bla bla"
No it's straight from copyright 101, stupid fucking white FUCK.

You really think that you aren't creating a derivative work based on another work when you "just" publish your changes, you piece of fucking shit.

As I said: white men do not accept any of this, but it is the law. Read a line of cases.
What you "heard" was wrong. There are no "clever" workarounds you white fuck.

> DURRR TEACH ME COPYRIGHT 101 FOR FREE
Go enroll in lawschool fucktard.

> Do you have a source for that claim? That seems pretty strongly at odds from what I've heard about derivative works.

    What you "heard" was garbage from other white fucking idiots, not from lawyers.

 >>/79493254/ →
> CCIIITTAATTIOONN NEEEDDEDDD!!!!!
> U R LYING, 
> DURRR WHOITE POWHARRRR
17 U.S.C. §101.:
”[a] ‘derivative work’ as a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgement, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’.” 17 U.S.C. §101.


> A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’

> A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’

> A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’

> A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’

220px-Kana... png
(88.75 KB, 220x336)

 >>/79489051/
> Why do they cling to gpl if they just ignore it?
Ask them.
Email them at linux-kernel(at)vger.kernel.org
Then check lkml.org
Ask them why they ignore the Grsecurity GPL violation.

 >>/79489063/
Didn't think they'd delete it. LKML used to not censor. They also used to debate such things.

Here is a new email sent:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/1/115
(Which the wayback machine's save-page-now won't archive, just spins and spins and spins)

81x0u83lcUL._RI_ jpg
(423.68 KB, 2560x1920)

 >>/79489051/
> Why do they cling to gpl if they just ignore it?
Why do enemies pretend to be friends?
They want you to do work for them for free: so they induce in you a belief that you will get code by way of the GPL if anyone modifies the code you contribute.

This is what drives the free-labour done. They then ban and delete any complaints about GPL violations, or stay silent and do not talk about them. The FSF and the Software Freedom Conservancy are the same, as Bradly Spengler notes:

>  https://twitter.com/spendergrsec/status/1293155787859206146
> Importantly, neither the FSF nor the SFC, nor in fact any actual lawyer agrees with this bizarre claim from an anonymous troll. More info about the source of the claim can be found here: https://grsecurity.net/setting_the_record_straight_on_oss_v_perens_part1
>  Thanks for doing your part, "Dr" to continue the troll's harrassment

>  >LOL. " #GRSecurity violates both the Linux kernel's copyright and the #GCC #copyright by forbidding redistribution of the patches (in their Access Agreement): which are non-seperable derivative works...

The FSF and the SFConservancy and "Any Lawyer" believe that claiming that Grsecurity violates the GPL by restricting redistribution is a "unsupported bizzare claim" according to Bradly Spengler.

https://perens.com/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/

The FSF head does NOT use free software: he is an apple faggot. Same with the SFconservancy (who don't do anything anyway, much like the FSF).

The only thing they do is:
1) Effectively embezzle donations
2) Pay themselves
3) Pay women
4) Give terrible legal advice.
5) Ban anyone who discusses GPL enforcement.

idk why i thought it was funny at the time but it was

this is actually really funny