/g/ - Technolo/g/y

Except for dumb stuff like digitalocean, aws, vultr, linode

They're attacking you for two reasons:
1) To save money: To prevent another multi-million dollar settlement (FSF vs Cisco). With you gone it wont happen. They also don't want to have to "pay off" the FSF by contributing donations either (which would increase your ability to hire lawyers and sue violators (even when the outcome of the action is difficult to predict (thus no contingency))).

2) Cultural reasons: the rest of the "they" believe that you like young girls: In your heart. And they oppose any man liking girls. That is: they believe you have thoughts and they oppose any man having such thoughts. Men are mules that must work for, fight, and give their life for women, their country, etc. Not live for themselves. Not have happiness. Only toil and responsibility.

You noted once that your life has been incredibly sad.
Being denied the purest love would fit the bill.

They hate you for what they think you believe in your mind. What they believe that they have deduced from your previous wrightings. They hate you for your thoughts they ascribe to you. For having those thoughts. For being capable of having those thoughts.

We've been defending you in the various programmer and anime forums, including your previous statements. For years, and now aswell. The namecalling is going every which way and both sides hate eachother:

On one side there are the old hackers, the men, and the anime-lovers, the NEETs. The beloved language is C.

On the other side are the wage-workers, and the Rust programming language (C++ ... plus plus... basically: and it takes just as much memory to compile as C++ code).

The fight is as hot as molten lead: and there is real true hatread.
One underlying notion is that those on the side of C, and who are defending you, also like cute young girls: and those who love Rust and hate you want any idea of such stricken from the earth.

Xonotic removes "team members" (developer) for insulting people.

>  Well... strong words are not disallowed, but using strong words to insult others (players or developers alike) falls under invective.
>  Like, you can call a core gameplay mechanic of first person shooters "shitscan" all you like, that's allowed.
>  But the moment you attack the people, a line has been crossed.

This is what you get for contributing code etc to opensource: Judged and "sanctioned". You're seen as no-better than a non-contributor/player.

>  https://forums.xonotic.org/showthread.php?tid=8522
>  https://xonotic.devfull.de/xonvote:27500/poll/405

--

divVerent supports sawing off the dicks of kids
"if a doctor approves"
>  if a doctor diagnoses a condition that can be helped by SRS, and "whoever is legally responsible" (depending on age and jurisdiction, parent and/or child) consents
>  there's no problem
>  wasnt that famous kid jazz reassigned as a kid?
>  that's just HIS JOB

--

Xonotic main dev:
> Rudolf Polzer - Senior Software Engineer - Google 
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rudolf-polzer-99122418

Engine developer chopped his dick and balls off:
>  Ashley Hale - Software Engineer - DarkPlaces 
>  https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashley-hale-7723648
This person used to be Forest Hale. Works at Google now. Joined Google before Rudolf Polzer did. Probably got him in.

Is this the right way to talk with Xonotic? Asking for a friend...

>  bones@112.213.34.77 (QuakeNet)                                                
> 01:53 -!- Irssi: Starting query in QuakeNet with bones_was_here
> 01:53  .
> 01:53  > if mikee's claims were a) true b) put into 
>             practise, he would lose access to the code his chaos anthology is 
>             based on
> 01:53  My claims are true. It is your choice to disbelieve the 3 
>             lawyers/law-offices I cited.
> 01:53  No I would not "lose access" to the code my fork is based on: the 
>             source code is allready out there. I would "lose" the legal right 
>             to use the code: but I would ignore such and continue doing so: 
>             this is a hobby: not a "jehrb". FreeSoftware was never based 
>             hard-and-fast on US law. The GPL is a "hack" of US law: it works 
>             "well enough" mostly based on the fact that 1) other juristictions 
>             exist (remeber 
> 01:53  Debian used to host its crypto packages outside of the US, 2) 
>             Federal copyright suits are very expensive for any party. 3) 
>             There's no money in suing over free software usually because the 
>             parties do no typically register their copyrights before a 
>             same/similar violation and thus statutory damages and attorneys 
>             fees are unavailable.
> 01:53  oh i'm sorry, did i rustle your jimmies?
> 01:54  No: you simply are wrong, retard.
> 01:54  a stupid lay fuck who thinks he's "smart"
> 01:54  but you said it yourself: I would "lose" the legal right 
>                        to use the code
> 01:55  you said I would "lose access" 
> 01:55  what you said is incorrect
> 01:55  I don't give one fuck about losing the legal "right"
> 01:55  ok: you would have to take down your mod, or it would 
>                        get taken down


> 01:55  so why do you campaign to have your own access 
>                        restricted?
> 01:55  no I would not have to "take down" my mod you piece of shit
> 01:56  I'm the only one who uses my mod you stupid fuck
> 01:56  we know it's all you
> 01:56  and I distribute it to my friends on blu-ray
> 01:56  we know when you say "we" it's just you
> 01:56  Royal We
> 01:56  moddb isn't going to keep it online when it's in breach 
>                        of copyright, so yes it would be taken down
> 01:56  because I'm better than you
> 01:56  no it would not be "taken down"
> 01:56  I can find other hosts outside the USA
> 01:56  :)
> 01:56  which do not follow US law
> 01:57  you stupid piece of shit
> 01:57  and it is not hosted on moddb at all
> 01:57  do you even check your links you retard?
> 01:57  anyway you could sue me
> 01:57  and would win
> 01:57  and then the rest of your opensource shit would be fucked in the USA
> 01:57  since all you opensource white fucking piece of shit programmers 
>             are:

US Government Agencies I.P. Addresses

https://textbin.net/5nrwaojlyd

US Government Agencies: Blacklist compiled by SquidBlacklist.org on 5/24/2014.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, SUPREME COURT, CONGRESS, US MILITARY, LAW ENFORCEMENT, CIA, FBI, DHS, DEA, ATF, FEMA, NASA, EPA, NSA, US AIRFORCE, US ARMY, US NAVY, NATO, CDC, CONTRACTORS, PENTAGON, US MARSHALLS, SAVVIS, and others....

DANGEROUS I.P. ADDRESSES THAT YOU SHOULD NEVER EVER SCAN

https://textbin.net/krdysfuwvs

Can someone publish ChaosEsqueAnthology to Steam?

I don't want to.
Can you?

moddb.com/games/chaosesqueanthology

iscord.gg/FaKSAaKFhs
We are a genuine Christian server
We try to convert people to christianism, arguments are welcome, also this server is not for people who get mad easily

Grsecurity GPL Violations: Linus/FSF/SFConservancy won't defend. Claw back your copyrights. BSD-in-Practice was not the deal.

Silence is consent.

> Are there FOSS developers making decent money via Patreon, GoFundMe, whatever?

Yes, Grsecurity is making good money.
They simply added a no-redistribution agreement to their patch of the Linux Kernel.
>  ( https://perens.com/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/ )


The FSF, Software Freedom Conservancy, and the Corporate Linux Kernel Developers all agree that this is fine (silence is consent).

>  https://twitter.com/spendergrsec/status/1293155787859206146
> Importantly, neither the FSF nor the SFC, nor in fact any actual lawyer agrees with this bizarre claim from an anonymous troll. More info about the source of the claim can be found here: https://grsecurity.net/setting_the_record_straight_on_oss_v_perens_part1
>  Thanks for doing your part, "Dr" to continue the troll's harrassment

>  >LOL. " #GRSecurity violates both the Linux kernel's copyright and the #GCC #copyright by forbidding redistribution of the patches (in their Access Agreement): which are non-seperable derivative works...


Contributors should blanket-revoke their contributions from all free-takers since they didn't agree to BSD-in-Practice. They should also claw-back any transferred copyrights from the FSF using the 30 year clawback provision in the US Copyright Act. Design of how a program works is a copyrightable aspect (Ex: How RMS designed GCC 30 years ago or so etc)

Had to repost this because the linux admins deleted the email:


>  https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/28/2518
>  The message you requested cannot be found.
> The message you requested cannot be found. The message with the url http://feisty.lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/28/2518 does not exist in the database.

Grsecurity GPL Violations: Bring a CASE act claim every time GrSecurity releases a new infringing work?

>  https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/28/2518
>  The message you requested cannot be found.
> The message you requested cannot be found. The message with the url http://feisty.lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/28/2518 does not exist in the database.