/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Was this planned to make us seem crazy? Because it looks that way. We don't need your help. The brainwashed already think we are the instant we say anything negative about jews. Yet they don't question why they have that Pavlovian response.

1694378080939672 jpg
(419.38 KB, 1600x1204)

 >>/91200/
> make love to cunny,
In national socialist society there is no room for pedofiles

g4gf42gf42g4 jpeg
(141.23 KB, 978x1265)

 >>/91202/
> Was this planned to make us seem crazy?

yeah we get these type of threads often. Whoever makes these threads want us to respond agreeing with them, then they screencap the entire thread and go "See what /pol/ thinks about this guyszzzz!"

And whatever

 >>/91200/
Another weird thread. There's been so many here lately. What's going on?

 >>/91224/
The weird threads have never stopped since I joined moderation in 2017. It has been fucking annoying for years now. Thought about handing it back to Ocelotte when he stopped by until the talking about switching /pol/ to Anarchists. Which I knew to be a bad idea, knew the jewish history of co-opting the Greek Anarchos into it's modern era perversion.  >>/endpolmeta/1278/   >>/endpolmeta/1279/  >>/endpolmeta/1280/  >>/endpolmeta/1282/ These recent examples would have been the entire board should /pol/ have switched to Anarchists.

1608346507729 png
(747.94 KB, 696x621)

1608398779661 jpg
(61.15 KB, 600x600)

1608404253... jpg
(121.28 KB, 670x1024)

1608406222... jpg
(62.48 KB, 315x1024)

1608406232086 jpg
(64.63 KB, 675x800)

 >>/91205/
I agree with the sentiment and reason, though it should be allowed to manufacture women at a lab. Instead of men wasting resources competing against each other for a used-up woman, a lab can provide them with a fertile virgin with desired (and Nat-soc approved) genetics.

In this context, what should be the age of consent? 

In my opinion, 18 years of age might be too much to wait... however, something messed up like 5 years (before the age of reason, which is 7) is pedo and degenerate.

1608406446... jpg
(93.66 KB, 649x1024)

1608406477633 png
(169.07 KB, 714x644)

1608432356197m jpg
(129.51 KB, 1024x624)

1608495781268 jpg
(120.12 KB, 740x732)

1608511709... jpg
(81.17 KB, 485x1024)

 >>/91202/
When mentioning the jews, sometimes it is better to refer to them as their crimes.


Ex:
The slave trade leadership
The Iraq war (or 9/11) liars 
The child sex traffickers
The child organ traffickers
The Ukrainian genociders
etc

Use whatever you think will gain attention of leftists, so infighting can ensue.

 >>/91272/
When National Socialists rule, women are not used up. I get your hatred for women. They're ruled by emotions and the brown ones are a thousand times more insane. But to shun untouched unspoiled women for the sins of used up whores is pointless. MGTOW only stimulates excitement in jews because of the obvious fact it prevents us from breeding.
> a lab can provide them with a fertile virgin with desired (and Nat-soc approved) genetics
Or you know, find an actual fertile virgin who isn't a whore without resorting to being a pedophile. As rare as the adult kind may be, they still exist. The issue in this modern degenerate era is a man must wade through the piles of sluts to find one.
> In this context, what should be the age of consent?
In National Socialist Germany, that age was 16 if paired with an adult and 14 if near the same age. This was about marriage. Of course pre-marital sex wasn't shilled so hard then either.

 >>/91280/
No one said anything about hurting women.

All I said is to employ technology to get the best woman technology can attain. They still will have the same rights as they traditionally did (no alimony nor child support).

 >>/91281/
> No one said anything about hurting women.
Right, because.. neither did I?

1675312961184056 jpg
(2.57 MB, 2688x2079)

 >>/91288/
> women are not used up
> I get your hatred for women
All I posted was increasing the SUPPLY of women. No one said about hurting them (using them up, or acting based on hate).

All I want is a world without scarcity, nor the problems that scarcity creates.
> pic related also applies to women

 >>/91291/
> No one said about hurting them
Well you're right about that. Absolutely no one did.
> "I get your hatred for women"
I got that impression from the memes/infographs you've shared in another thread.

 >>/91273/
People inevitably look confused and ask "who" when any of these subjects come up. I just say Hebrews. Strange how "jews" in the negative instantly provokes a response in their brains that you're insane for blaming them but the term Hebrews does not. Almost like they've been hypnotized their entire lives to react that way.

1695614961472961 jpg
(23.95 KB, 369x459)

1697728703136752 jpg
(42.05 KB, 580x424)

1697723789209103 png
(1018.46 KB, 900x1000)

 >>/91272/
>  it should be allowed to manufacture women at a lab
And how about rather to fix that hypergamy as its the core of nations strenght
Woman is more than a seed bed to be used (and there comes a lot of psychology between mother and child etc) and BDM etc is a good evidence of this and just picking these few examples
> Leni reifenstal
> Gertrude scholtz Klink
> Hanna Reitsch
> Gerdy Trooth
> Winifred Wagner
All of these came from ashes of degenerate weimar where women were basically a seed beds 
Dont be an mgtow raise an swastika
> In this context, what should be the age of consent
17 at worst if i had to be pushed to corner to change it to marry and sexual consent at 18

> 17 at worst if i had to be pushed to corner to change it to marry and sexual consent at 18

17 at worst to marry 18 for sexual consent

1408377194169 jpg
(80.24 KB, 955x705)

I think much of /pol/ either forgot, or wasnt there for 2016 let alone Ron Paul.  People liked Ron Paul for his vocal ideas about the federal reserve, but most of us knew he wouldn't make it. We got excited when he got far, but he was blocked by the republican party and media. We supported Trump because he was a best bet for disruption, though nowhere near as good as Ron Paul, but he was too rich and too loud to be snubbed and snuffed out like Ron Paul was. And the meme of him being the god emperor was just that; a meme. Him shitting on people and being vocal was a bonus that made people like him more.
All the people now saying to throw their vote at these random literally-whos are showing their ignorance.  Even Ron Paul making it through the primaries was a pipe dream and now people are suggesting politicians have even less of a chance? It's stupid and REEKS of a glowOP.

And no, I don't think we can fix this problem without something drastic and uncharacteristic happening. We certainly can't vote our way out of this. But pushing that trump coming back would be worse than another biden or harris is either straight up ignorance, or malice.

 >>/91355/
Nobody here says that Trump coming back is worse than Biden or Kamala. The main point about him is that he's a quarter jew Zionist piece of shit who will gladly wear a yarmulke and went against the entire anti immigration stance during his presidency that he promised before his presidency.

Don't keep all of your guns in one place. Spread them out today. Bury one in the yard. Keep one at the home of a friend. Put one in the attic.

AIDSkike every time... mp4
(4.89 MB, 1920x1080 h264)

 >>/91378/
> Let your children find them
> children shoot each other
> AIDSkike rubs his hands together

hi it is me again 
i am back
let us talk as soon as possible
do you have the time

5 jpeg
(48.99 KB, 336x351)

 >>/91547/
The point of imageboards is to talk. The best part about a slow one like this is - someone can respond to you when they do have free time. So talk.