/polru/ - pol - Russian Edition

A peace summit was recently held in Switzerland.
The importance of it is not that any decision will be made there, but that a huge number of representatives from many countries, both in Europe and abroad, came together and unanimously voiced the postulates that I described more than a year ago in this post: >>> Polru/165280@129185.
Previously, it was all sort of “hung in the air”; the leading players understood each other’s motivations and logic, but didn’t say anything out loud. Now, during the summit, the previously unofficial position has become official, which is extremely important, since it means that the international community has finally chosen a course to force the Pynarigima to return to the mutually recognized borders of 1991 without any notes or reservations. Especially significant is the participation of the head of India, one of the economic allies of the Russian Federation.
It is unlikely that after the summit, Ukraine will be thrown with weapons or money - the EU, alas, is still militarily in the state of the "naked king". The money was wasted, and everything was gone. They still have nothing to support Ukraine seriously, and the arsenals “for a rainy day” located on the territory of NATO member states are wholly owned by the United States, and they are not in a hurry to unpack their reserves yet, paradoxically, for reasons I described earlier this year in this post: >>/395870/

While both parties in the United States are delaying the supply of aid to the Ukrainian Armed Forces, intending to use them as a bargaining chip in the electoral game in the upcoming elections, can Ukraine somehow help itself?
Actually, yes.
There is one unusual, literally Hegelian method. It is, I think, in the drones. Moreover, not in some hyper-super special combat vehicles, such as the "Bayraktar" - the pace of supply of which lags far behind the combat and technical losses of these machines due to their operation "to wear out" in the first months of the war - but in the most ordinary civilian units, converted to scouts and carriers of the BK.
The essence of the method is simple: without the ability to improve the quality of machines, you can increase their number (which guarantees their development into quality). Already, the active use of drones is depriving both sides of the conflict of effective offensive operations, but what if drones were used not for defense, but for attack?
If the AFU can create “super-saturation” points with drones at any site, this will allow them, for example, to effectively destroy the rear logistics of the VSRF. You can sheath a tank with iron sheets, but not tankers and transport trucks. And even in the case of a tank, nothing prevents remote mining of roads using drones. If we move from single attacks to a planned and methodical violation of supply lines, then drones will become the “wonderwaffe”, which will allow us to overcome the positional problem not because of the invention of new weapons, but due to the invention of new tactics and strategies for using existing models.
It is in a situation of confrontation between the armies of drones that the AFU can take advantage of its operational response and technical support from NATO, which will consist in eliminating the threat from the WSRF by hacking the frequencies on which their drones operate.
But that's just a theory. No one has tried the practice yet, but drawing analogies with the situation in the Red Sea, where full-fledged US squadrons cannot break through the Houthi missile shield due to the mass nature of these very missiles, suggests certain thoughts.
28 years with zero-coon