/postleftypol/ - Post Left Politically Incorrect

Destroy the left from the inside


New Thread
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Thread]

Page: Prev [1] [2] [3] [4] Next | [Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]


thumbnail of IMG_4187.JPG
thumbnail of IMG_4187.JPG
IMG_4187 JPG
(50.66 KB, 300x356)




thumbnail of think.jpg
thumbnail of think.jpg
think jpg
(23.5 KB, 512x512)


thumbnail of Libre_flag.png
thumbnail of Libre_flag.png
Libre_flag png
(72.3 KB, 300x300)
Pedophilia has personally effected my ability to express my personal political theory of libre.I hate and do not support advocate or allow pedophilia. Pedophila is not libre. Unfortunatly people have abused this notion of freedom and made a chan to post kids and since then libre has been tainted by theses people. Now I know their abomination chan was shut down but that means people search out the word libre and see chan in the url and see my libre treatises on reddit tumbler and 8chan and they think it has to do with some hive of sexual predators. They think freedom means avoiding capture under the appreciation of freedom. They abuse freeedom they ARE NOT LIBRE The notion of freedom has been trampled on.  I try to portray how the modern human is in a state of libre and then I say how humans shall not be shackled by restrictions. Every single time I try and express libre they think of librechan and the word libre itself has become a pizza code word of sorts. Why not I change the name? Because I am not going to be shackled by this though to be honest it has made it a problem I do not want to make a board called /libre/ because I dont want to wake up to naked kids on my answer to fixing society. An open sourced inclusive world community with the top layer of those without fear. This of course is a consortium of maniacs and is like the ripely's believe it or not meets life size statues like the silver surfer the true elite. You do not disrespect le libre with your petty groping of children. That is like taking a cage and calling it libre these swine that fondle. These swine that fondle are not libre. I am appalled.


 >>/35/
>  They abuse freeedom they ARE NOT LIBRE

Apparently there is some history and different terminology at play here, but as I see it, you only accept a mutual freedom as freedom? Like, your reasons for why people acting freely isn't 'libre' is because others are not free? 

I don't really accept any bit of this. If we force the bad people to abide by rules (i.e. to be domesticated, to be submissive and dominated internally by a plethora of geists, etc.), this opens the door for all sorts of oppression on anyone. And not even just this weak slippery slope argument, but honestly I worry about being among the first on the cutting block. Because who else is universally hated? The anti-social people, the maniacs, the amoral ones, and so on. So fuck your "libre". I want freedom.

 >>/36/
>  I almost had to leave the country they are framing leftists with this pedo shit.

Then maybe stop being a leftist...



thumbnail of IMG_4634.JPG.jpeg
thumbnail of IMG_4634.JPG.jpeg
IMG_4634.JPG jpeg
(269.03 KB, 1280x1022)




thumbnail of Oni Chan.png
thumbnail of Oni Chan.png
Oni Chan png
(145.54 KB, 536x640)







thumbnail of 1478222664-crazy-frog.jpg
thumbnail of 1478222664-crazy-frog.jpg
1478222664-crazy-frog jpg
(155.31 KB, 1162x778)
favourite spook book passages? I'll start us off:

"Man is his goal, his ought, his destiny, calling, task, his — ideal; he is to himself a future, otherworldly he. And what makes a “proper fellow” of him? Being true, being good, being moral, etc. Now he looks askance at every one who does not recognize the same “what,” seek the same morality, have the same faith, he chases out “separatists, heretics, sects,” etc.

No sheep, no dog, exerts itself to become a “proper sheep, a proper dog”; no beast has its essence appear to it as a task, i.e. as a concept that it has to realize. It realizes itself in living itself out, in dissolving itself, passing away. It does not ask to be or to become anything other than it is.

Do I mean to advise you to be like the beasts? That you ought to become beasts is an exhortation which I certainly cannot give you, as that would again be a task, an ideal (“How doth the little busy bee improve each shining hour. In works of labor or of skill I would be busy too, for Satan finds some mischief still for idle hands to do”). It would be the same, too, as if one wished for the beasts that they should become human beings. Your nature is, once for all, a human one; you are human natures, human beings. But, just because you already are so, you do not still need to become so. Beasts too are “trained,” and a trained beast executes many unnatural things. But a trained dog is no better for itself than a natural one, and has no profit from it, even if it is more companionable for us."
"As long as there still exists even one institution which the individual may not dissolve, the ownness and self-appurtenance of Me is still very remote. How can I, e.g. be free when I must bind myself by oath to a constitution, a charter, a law, “vow body and soul” to my people? How can I be my own when my faculties may develop only so far as they “do not disturb the harmony of society” (Weitling)?

The fall of peoples and mankind will invite me to my rise."

G O O D  S H I T




Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


0 replies | 0 file
New Thread
Max 20 files0 B total
Refresh

Page: Prev [1] [2] [3] [4] Next | [Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]