No banners, make a banners thread

/random/ - Off-Topic

Welcome to /random/! Basically /b/, but with less shitposting.


New Thread
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Thread]

Page: Prev [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] Next | View | Catalog | Banners | Logs


thumbnail of Area 51 Panorama CLASSIFIED.jpg
thumbnail of Area 51 Panorama CLASSIFIED.jpg
Area 51 Panorama... jpg
(15.13 KB, 220x220)
Libertarians think that they should give up defending freedom because Americans hate liberty, but Libertarians should keep resisting tyranny for selfish reasons.

While the elites control the money, government, and media, the 99% have the numbers.

One Libertarian may not be able to resist being sent to the concentration camps, but one million people might.



They got them fucking aliens and UFOs, teleportation tech. Portals that connect to the ass end of space and possibly other universes probably but yet we can't seem to get to the fucking moon because NASA has become brain dead and broke and soon the moon will be a Chinese moon, Russia ain't gonna make it.




thumbnail of The Face You Make.jpg
thumbnail of The Face You Make.jpg
The Face You Make jpg
(884.3 KB, 2460x2365)
Libertarians think that they should give up defending freedom because Americans hate liberty, but Libertarians should keep resisting tyranny for selfish reasons.

While the elites control the money, government, and media, the 99% have the numbers.

One Libertarian may not be able to resist being sent to the concentration camps, but one million people might.

https://minichan.net/


The globalists have absolutely covered all the bases.

Americans say the answer to tyranny is term limits, but term limits are useless when the elections are rigged.

Americans think the USA would be a free country if there were no electronic voting machines, but Canada doesn't have electronic voting machines and Canada is still a police state.

Americans say mandatory
voting means freedom, but Australia has mandatory voting and is also a police state.

A Constitutional Convention won't work because if the elites don't follow the Bill of Rights now then why would the ruling powers obey a new Constitution?

The only realistic options Americans have today is to drop out, move to a small town, and buy guns, ammo, gold, and food and wait for everything to collapse.





thumbnail of Screenshot_20250525-052440.png
thumbnail of Screenshot_20250525-052440.png
Screenshot... png
(774.31 KB, 720x1600)







thumbnail of Screenshot_20250802_024718_Chrome.jpg
thumbnail of Screenshot_20250802_024718_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot... jpg
(353.94 KB, 1080x2340)


Americans either don't know or want to know that the US is collapsing or think that nothing can be done to save the USA. Any plans or ideas to slow or escape the decay are quickly shot down as unworkable.

Instead of demanding that minimum wages be repealed or checkpoints be ended, Americans would rather beg for their chains by asking for more laws.

Insanity.



Used to stare at a screen with zero EXIF, back before filters mattered.

OLaF, 2010–2013. /X/ was alive. /god/ had logs. Gore was truth, not flex.

Remember the red folder? 43 images. No caption. Last one was just a bathtub and the fan.

Still hear the audio from 017_89.mov when I sleep.

If you're still out there, post a null string or confirm: BINARY LODGE.

No code. No replies needed. Just checking if the fire still flickers.



thumbnail of Top Secret Aircraft.png
thumbnail of Top Secret Aircraft.png
Top Secret Aircraft png
(351.81 KB, 715x521)
If you said that the government was wiretapping your phone in 1999, everybody would have called you a nutjob.

Now if you say that the government is wiretapping your phone, no one cares.

How can Americans sleep at night now or look in a mirror without feeling disgusted and ashamed?






Vatican defends science
https://sightmagazine.com.au/essays/essay-vatican-defends-science-from-politics-ideology-and-misinformation/

Rather than attacking science, this new statement of concern from the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Protecting Freedom of Science and Preventing Distortion of Scientific Truth, is a full-throated defence of science, which it believes is “fundamental to the development of humankind” and needs to be protected “from ideological or political interference”.

The document is especially timely in the United States, where government officials are giving more credence to conspiracy theories than scientific consensus. For example, American research universities like Harvard are under attack, and scientific research is being defunded for political reasons by the Trump administration-run National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health, which used to be big supporters of science.

https://www.pas.va/en/events/2025/statement_of_concern.html
The Pontifical Academy of Sciences’ Council and co-signing members of the Academy issue this statement with deep concern for the growing global threats to the freedom of science and the systematic misrepresentation of scientific truth. Across multiple contexts and continents, we are witnessing an alarming rise in attempts to discredit, politicize, or suppress scientific knowledge. These developments not only endanger the integrity of science but also imperil the well-being of societies that depend on science to address their most pressing challenges, including poverty, pandemics, health care, climate change, and use of artificial intelligence.

Patterns have emerged in recent years that indicate a disturbing trend: scientific institutions are being undermined through political pressure, budgetary and workforce cuts, and censorship. Evidence-based findings are ignored or openly mis-represented. The peaceful, open discourse that characterizes the scientific process is being replaced in some quarters by ideology-driven narratives, misinformation, and disinformation. In extreme cases, scientists are harassed, marginalized, or personally threatened for their work.

Such attacks are not confined to a particular region or political ideology; they are surfacing in democracies and authoritarian systems alike, in the global North and South. The undermining of truth through denialism and anti-scientific rhetoric has become an international phenomenon. This is not merely a crisis of communication—it is a structural assault on the values and institutions that make science a pillar of human progress.

The Pontifical Academy of Sciences, guided by its statutes and tradition, has always upheld the belief that science is fundamental to the development of humankind. The Academy has engaged deeply with issues of science diplomacy, from pandemics and climate change to the ethics of artificial intelligence, access to and use of energy, and pathways to reduce global poverty, and has advocated for education accessible for all as a means to reduce knowledge-based inequalities in today’s world. These endeavors rely on a shared respect for truth and on the protection of scientific inquiry from ideological or political interference.

The elites allowed Americans to have cars, airplanes, straws, and stoves and then they banned them.

Why do you think the globalists will allow you to keep the Internet?

Prisons and North Korea don't have the web for a reason. Ideas and communication tools are dangerous.

https://www.godlikeproductions.com/



Whoever comes after Trump will be worse than Trump. Trump will wreak havoc on society. Then something happens (elections, coup, assassination, whatever), then Trump will be designated as "enemy of the people", then his family members will be prosecuted/purged as well, and the next regime/regimes will wreak havoc on pretty much everything everyones life.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/11/frank-rich-trumpism-after-trump.html
"By illuminating a pathway to power that no one had thought possible, and demolishing the civic guardrails that we assumed protected us from autocrats, Trump has paved the way for far slicker opportunists to gain access to the national stage. Imagine a presidential candidate with Trump’s views and ambitions who does not arrive with Trump’s personal baggage, his undisciplined penchant for self-incrimination, and his unsurpassed vulgarity. The broad lesson imparted at the dawn of the Wallace movement in the 1962 Cold War thriller The Manchurian Candidate still holds: The fascist presidential candidate to be truly frightened of is the pious paragon of rectitude who presents himself (or herself) as a selfless patriot and who purports to protect and defend American democracy even while plotting (with a possible assist from the Russians or Chinese) to destroy it."




thumbnail of Polandball (I drew).png
thumbnail of Polandball (I drew).png
Polandball (I drew) png
(29.08 KB, 800x600)




Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


0 replies | 0 file
Refresh
New Thread
Max 20 files0 B total