sharishaxd... jpg
(61.86 KB, 711x1080)
>>/74148/
That is not exactly it.
This is about the way the networks function, right now we have a select few people who own the keys and we trust them to not copy those keys or fuck them up. Part of today's disaster was due to an indian corp having joined that trusted group and creating a key secret that was just "4" lmao.
We also have a barrier that "nobody can do reverse engineering and find all of the flaws in a software! it would take decades", which is no longer the case.
A "physically constrained" security works by the logic that we have a known number of powerful machines in the world that can make this "data diamond", and we can derive from that to trust it.
It's never impossible that someone else would be able to reproduce it, but it will necessarily cost them more than they will get by breaking it.
For us users, it would only mean that we would login in services and even secure our connections (such as loading an URL) via the blockchain, using tokens.
But also mean that in order to host your own shit securely on the network via your computer, you would have to either buy/lend some of that security diamond, or produce your own (enough of it to make it too costly to steal your shit, more or less like how heavy is your safe door).