a random ratanon banner

/ratanon/ - Rationalists Anonymous

Remember when /ratanon/ was good?


New Thread
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Thread]

Page: Prev [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] Next | [Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]


thumbnail of 3fb[1].png
thumbnail of 3fb[1].png
3fb[1] png
(548.06 KB, 600x599)
itai.ilyich/if-i-cant-have-me-no-one-can-kathleen-rebecca-forth-born-april-11-1980-31c49ed15121">https://medium.comitai.ilyich/if-i-cant-have-me-no-one-can-kathleen-rebecca-forth-born-april-11-1980-31c49ed15121

Has anyone corroborated any of this? I was sort of believing it, but then there was that bit about someone stalking her

> If this person is stalking me, their plausible deniability is on fleek! I am not even sure I am being stalked.

Which makes her seem super crazy.
110 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer

 >>/4797/
> The name is a two-pronged claim of superior holiness:
> “Caring” because, well, of course she is more compassionate than you.
> “Unit of” because she approaches things, even caring, in a systematic, scientific way; that is to say, she is smarter than you.
On one hand, he's right. On the other hand, the idea that people wiser and more compassionate than yourself should not rule over you is counterintuitive (to say the least). But I guess you can't argue with results.

 >>/4786/
At least frame this as something like "status drives evolved in an environment where following them correlated with increased reproductive success". Or am I getting trolled?


 >>/4818/
That's what I was referring to with 'results'. I.e it sounds nice until you realise the purported wise smart bigbrains are just nigger worshippers, and having them in charge sucks




Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


0 replies | 0 file
Refresh
New Thread
Max 20 files0 B total