/revolt/ - Revolt

this is an amazing board, but both the board and endchan are empty af, anyway both would be deleted if the mainstream and SJW knew about its existence

True jpg
(29 KB, 398x431)

 >>/54/
ayyyy

I'm back. I totally forgot about making this board. 

Wow, over a year ago.

 >>/55/
essentially I made it waaaaay back when on 8chan when /ggrevolt/ anons were discussing dropping "gg" from the name. 
I reserved it on 8chan, and then here when /ggrevolt/ moved here. 

I think enough people said fuck changing the board name to /revolt/, too many dank memes attached to /ggrevolt/, so I held on to /revolt/, just tried to do a thing with it. 

I dunno, armed insurrection may still be needed sometime in the future, and I would like to discuss how to go inna woods if SHTF.

Citizens for Constitutional Freedom News Conference Oregon 1/4/16

https://youtube.com/watch?v=VxE3Sz8enTs

Feds shutting off power and jamming cell phones. Hopefully one of the survivors manages to smuggle a video out. 

https://youtube.com/watch?v=5EwcD5z_egE

hammond-v-... pdf
(185.97 KB, 0x0)

haven't looked through this yet, but info on the arson cases

 >>/8/
> with a new diversity initiative
What's that? Your workplace isn't black enough? That's scary. 

Oklahoma, Texas, and New Mexico are pretty nice. Oklahoma is Jesusland, so expect some weird laws like liquor stores being closed on Sunday and you can only buy real beer from the liquor store.

image jpeg
(94.27 KB, 736x913)

Wyoming, Idaho and that whole area have amazing scenery. Most of the population is either White or Asian since Blacks and Arabs hate the cold. Some places are expensive to live so you just have to do some research. My favorite town was Red Lodge in Wyoming, but I can't remember how expensive it is to live there.

taken from 8/pol/:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/04/obamas-gun-control-plan-includes-gun-ban-social-security-beneficiaries/

> Obama’s Gun-Control Plan Includes Gun-Ban For Some Social Security Beneficiaries

> The White House released a fact-sheet Jan. 4 which previews the executive gun control Obama will unveil Tuesday and one aspect of the new controls is the inclusion of “information from the Social Security Administration in the background check system about beneficiaries who are prohibited from possessing a firearm.”

 >>/12/
cont.

From the White House Executive Order preview:

> Current law prohibits individuals from buying a gun if, because of a mental health issue, they are either a danger to themselves or others or are unable to manage their own affairs. The Social Security Administration (SSA) has indicated that it will begin the rulemaking process to ensure that appropriate information in its records is reported to NICS. The reporting that SSA, in consultation with the Department of Justice, is expected to require will cover appropriate records of the approximately 75,000 people each year who have a documented mental health issue, receive disability benefits, and are unable to manage those benefits because of their mental impairment, or who have been found by a state or federal court to be legally incompetent. The rulemaking will also provide a mechanism for people to seek relief from the federal prohibition on possessing a firearm for reasons related to mental health.

> Again, the push for a ban on gun possession for certain Social Security beneficiaries was already in the works during the summer, but it is also incorporated into the “mental health” aspect of Obama’s executive gun control.

> And this means that information on beneficiaries who meet the criteria of mental impairment–demonstrated in part by an inability to manage their own benefits–will be added to the National Instant Criminal Background System (NICS) so that the beneficiaries cannot buy a gun.

I'm not sure if everyone here has seen or not, but there is also a portion limiting individuals abilities to sell guns without a seller's license. 

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/obama-gun-control-rule-mental-illness-217340

image jpg
(370.79 KB, 640x2380)

image jpg
(425.27 KB, 640x2850)

image jpg
(755.67 KB, 640x3818)

Gentlemen, I would like to see where this board goes, however I think it goes without saying that any violent action that involves planning over the Internet with anyone you do not VERY closely should be assumed a honeypot of sting operation.

The first violent action in a revolution is almost always by a single individual or small group of close individuals. If you post how to make weapons or Molotov cocktails, or the like, like pics related, should always contain a disclaimer stating this is purely for educational purposes and the poster is not responsible for any damages or injuries that may occur.

I am not responsible for any death and/or injuries that occur because of this historical knowledge of how guerrilla warfare often works and it's tactics often used

But I feel I should leave one last tidbit with you gents. If you are planning anything, do it alone, dont change your habits, dont act like you're planning anything out of the ordinary. dont be jumpy or paranoid, but dont tell anyone about your plans. Not even your plans.

May God go with you all

 >>/14/
> Gentlemen, I would like to see where this board goes, however I think it goes without saying that any violent action that involves planning over the Internet with anyone you do not VERY closely should be assumed a honeypot of sting operation.
As I said in my purpose here, maintain OpSec. No actual planning would take place here. 

And a reminder, once you go online, your have no right to privacy according to the US government. The 4th Amendment does not apply here. The best you can do is try to mask your online activity used Tor and a VPN, and possibly I2P, but I know little about the latter.

 >>/15/
I know very little about any of them

 >>/14/
Anon, where the hell is the picture for blitzkrieg?

 >>/18/
I sadly dont have it, but it's pretty self explanatory