a random 32 banner

/32/ - Psychopolitics

It's all in your head


New Reply on thread #12
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]


thumbnail of tugofwar1.jpg
thumbnail of tugofwar1.jpg
tugofwar1 jpg
(81.27 KB, 758x405)
Tension and the Ties that Bind

This post was inspired by a conversation I saw on 8chan's /pol/ regarding another right-wing-oriented site, The Right Stuff, adopting an openly gay moderator and creating controversy. Many disapproved, viewing him as watering down the far right. I, personally, took a different view. Perhaps the person that brought up the topic, and many of those involved (including the rather enthusiastic person that posted over 150 times in the thread) were honest. I doubt they all were. Regardless, the lines of thinking that I saw there could have a drastically negative effect on the movement as a whole.

My view on the matter revolves around tension, and the role of it in shifting the Overton window. When I say tension, I don't mean it within the sense that common parlance does, to mean stress or a heightened state of emergency. I mean it to be in the physical sense, in which two forces pull at an object from opposite directions, creating a strain upon that object and keeping it rigid.
thumbnail of bubble-and-spider-web.jpg
thumbnail of bubble-and-spider-web.jpg
bubble-and-spider-web jpg
(493.97 KB, 1024x702)
Rethinking Overton

Personally, I think that the concept of a two-dimensional window to describe the Overton window is rather short-sighted. It simplifies politics and causes to brutish left-right and liberty-authority dichotomies. I prefer to think of it as a porous sphere, with infinite directions on which it can be acted, and political entities, causes, and even people are all minute parts surrounding it, both on the inside and out. Different, often static entities act on this bubble, both pushing it from the inside, and pulling it from the outside, in an attempt to either keep themselves inside, earn their way inside, or guide it so that undesirables end up out of it.

Those entities do not act alone, though. They are similar to a spider's web, all connected by various ties, both through the bubble, within the bubble, and outside of it. And through those ties, each of those entities pulls at one another, ensuring a certain sense of stasis, unless the ties happen to sever. And, since tension is a set of forces pulling at an object from various directions to keep it taut, occasionally those ties break, or new ones form that guide an entity into a particular direction, sometimes within the bubble, or even guiding it outside of it.

Naturally, not all pulls are created equal. Those within the bubble tend to have more gravity than those on the outside. Media and establishment backing are very effective and powerful tools to ensure that the bubble stays just where those on the inside want it. The status quo, after all, is a remarkably powerful lobby. Also, being a web rather than a line means that multiple forces may act upon one entity at any given time, creating pulls in various directions, and potentially heightening the tension between the entity and another one to unsustainable levels. Politics, after all, involves myriad interconnecting interests, all of which influence one another in very subtle manners.
thumbnail of heart-smile.jpg
thumbnail of heart-smile.jpg
heart-smile jpg
(25.33 KB, 431x385)
The Heart and the Smile

This leads to the role of the moderate and the extremist to those on the outside of the bubble. An example of this is the complaint regarding the legal marijuana lobby in the US, in which their advocates tended to look similar to strung-out hippies, inaccessible to the masses. Many complained that they were unable to find that voice that was able to speak to people, one that was clean-cut, well-spoken, and committed enough to their cause to lead it. That knight in a suit and tie never rode in on his Mercedes; legal marijuana, instead, had the Overton window guided in its direction through doctors advocating its medicinal use for cancer patients, leading to select states choosing to tax and legalize it.

The need for a public voice is important. Without such a megaphone, causes become echo chambers, containing nothing more than zealots divorced from reality, lacking in agency. To ensure that the masses are willing to listen, and push from within the Overton bubble towards your goal, you require those from just outside of it to convince them to do so. Those with charisma, that understand them, and are willing to reach out to those from within. Conversely, the need for true believers is also important. After all, as the moderates pull at the ties from those within it, those from within tend to pull back. To create the necessary tension to keep your advocates from losing their way, an ideological anchor is necessary to pull along with the moderates. Also, true believers tend to be thinkers and creators rather than talkers or doers, so they create the strategies and memes which the moderates then spread. When the moderates lose their anchor, they become co-opted at best, or useless at worst. To separate the two is to separate the heart and mind from the mouth. This is why the fragile tension inflicted on the two sides is so dangerous.
thumbnail of 8b7.png
thumbnail of 8b7.png
8b7 png
(417.94 KB, 680x680)
86ing the 27

While it may be low hanging fruit to bring up GamerGate, it's an easy example to digest, both in terms of its simplicity, its appeal to anons, and for me personally to discuss. GamerGate was beset by both internal and external pressures from the beginning. Among the external pressures inflicted on it were Breitbart, the gaming industry itself, and the men's rights movement. Perhaps the most insidious of all of them were e-celebrities from within gaming, the worst of which was Total Biscuit. Having had so many of their former heroes betray them, GG was waiting for someone, anyone to take their side. Enter John Bain. He viewed it as a consumer revolt, and was seemingly willing to take up their mantle and attack those that were fighting against gamers within the industry.

However, he did his fair share of concern trolling, as well. Among his most popular pieces of "advice" to GG was to separate the moderates from the extremists, and he would fight along side the moderates, letting the extremists be shunned. This didn't happen immediately, and he parted ways from within GG. However, the advice was eventually heeded as GG lost steam, and was desperately searching for more establishment approval. Purges to this day are still happening within the community, weeding out "extremist" elements to ensure that they appear presentable to the masses.

This has left GG without a brain or a heart. There is now literally no reason for it to exist, nothing for it to fight for, nothing being created or done. The outside world is no longer impacted in any way by GamerGate. Even the press that GG vowed to fight to the bitter end has moved on towards savaging the alt-right, viewing it as a threat and GamerGate as completely pacified. Without the ideological anchor holding GamerGate in place and its creators and thinkers, GamerGate is a cause adrift, patting itself on the back for existing without having a reason to exist at all. Such is the power of severing ties and exploiting tension.
thumbnail of wonderland_party_1.jpg
thumbnail of wonderland_party_1.jpg
wonderland_party_1 jpg
(120.84 KB, 616x411)
Catching Flies with Honey

Similarly, the Tea Party also suffered a rather similar fate. It originally started as an anti-tax, anti-bailout, right-wing movement. The protestors were rather obnoxious, reminiscent of old hippies from the 1960s trying to relive their flower child days in ways that weren't quite so embarrassing to them, at least to themselves. Lots of American flag shirts, tea bags hanging from hat rims, things like that. However, the voice was clear: no corporate bailouts with taxpayer dollars. Companies that chose to engage in risky behaviors and prey on the masses deserve to die rather than have Americans' money, especially in the time of recession, helping them stay afloat.

However, there were also extremist elements from within it. Being a right-wing group, it tended to attract support from groups desperately looking for something to cling onto, such as the Klan. Racists would show up to rallies and start to make it about Obama's race rather than the government-financial complex. This led to much derision from outside, casting them as hold white extremists, similar to the kind of treatment that Trump supporters get today. That group was only tentatively involved at best, though.

Their poison pill, however, didn't seek to sow dissent from within, but to bring the Tea Party within the establishment fold. Dick Armey and Sarah Palin, both rendered irrelevant by failed political ventures, chose to use their celebrity to create two wings of the Tea Party that were largely indiscernable from one another. There was no anchor, only groups seeking to co-opt it for their own ends, which made this type of co-opting rather easy. The Tea Party then became about standard fare conservative ideals, with a dash of libertarianism added. The original intent, in which corporate malfeasance was rewarded with taxpayer dollars, was lost, and while the Tea Party remains an ideological force to this day, it has completely lost its way. It was pulled into the bubble, rather than pulling the bubble to it.
thumbnail of breaking-the-chains.jpg
thumbnail of breaking-the-chains.jpg
breaking-the-chains jpg
(79.85 KB, 800x600)
Weak Links

As we are seeing now, not all breaks need be harmful. Case in point, Donald Trump's presidency. Much has been said about his unorthodox campaign, how he's rethinking the entire art of politics and creating a new path to the presidency, one the likes of which hasn't been seen for years and years. What I find interesting is that both parties seem very angry at the idea of him ascending. The left, naturally, is scared of the right becoming further polarized and becoming a credible threat to them and their cause. However, the right is seeing the formula that they thought would win thrown in their faces by the electorate. People are rejecting the watered down Tea Party line of low taxes and free markets, and the neo-conservative hegemonic attitude toward foreign policy. He has severed ties with this crowd and created a beast that they neither know nor understand, and the people have rallied behind him.

If it was simply the stereotype, the "angry white racists," it would be impossible for him to have the numbers he has. What I believe it is, is that he's rewriting what it means to be right-wing, taking the ideas that are popular with the people on the right today and applying them, while rejecting the dated ideologies of the right that define the establishment. In this end, he has drawn people to embrace him that would otherwise only tepidly vote for a Republican frontrunner, if at all. The establishment right's ties to the people have been broken, and their ties to a Trump-like politician, one unfrightened to speak his mind, one that pitches the ideas of placing the people first rather than big-money donors or abstract ideologies, have drawn new ties that strengthen his bonds. In this regard, breaking or refusing ties to dead weight that has found itself incapable of success can be beneficial.
thumbnail of elastic.jpg
thumbnail of elastic.jpg
elastic jpg
(92.84 KB, 420x280)
The Tangled Web We Weave

The lessons that can be learned from this are fourfold. First, if you are a movement on the outside looking in, be mindful and understanding to those more extreme than you, and be firm, and yet understanding to those more moderate than you. You desperately need one another far more than you think. The risk of losing any sort of impetus due to infighting, especially when acting outside of the establishment's wishes, are far greater than the rewards of purity or the attempts at rapid shifts of the Overton bubble. Tension, after all, can cause ties to break as much as act to hold two entities together.

Second, if you wish to exploit the tension between extremists and moderates, then you must find a fracture point within their ideologies and exploit it. In the case of /pol/ and TRS, the fracture point was the acceptance of homosexuality within the alt right. Within GamerGate, the fracture point was whether or not developers should be embraced or boycotted. If you can separate the outward pull from the moderates, you can twist them to your cause, or leave them adrift and pacified. Often, angering the extremists against the moderates is a very effective strategy at shattering the will of a movement. After all, the extremists tend to be rather emotional, while moderates are more self-absorbed and interested in self-promotion.
thumbnail of Bird Cage.png
thumbnail of Bird Cage.png
Bird Cage png
(1.04 MB, 1600x1280)
> muh 2048 characters

Third, the desire to be loved is a very strong one. It killed both GamerGate and the Tea Party. If it's possible to bring someone from within the establishment to create a pressure or fracture point, then this is ideal for turning the moderates against the extremists and causing them to shed the compass that keeps them oriented. It's very easy for people to grow starstruck, and when someone they respect and idolize gives them attention, they tend to listen, even if it's against their own self-interest.

Fourth, if you find yourself from outside of the Overton bubble, be mindful of other "allies" that seek to attach themselves to your cause. Having weak causes attach themselves can be harmful, and having too many connections to your little part of the web can create enough tension to the point where there is no direction. Too many friends can cause you become a locus of influence for hangers-on to attach themselves to you, attempting to gain relevance, and in the process diluting your message and lessening your pull on the window. Too many anchors in too many directions keeps you from pulling or going anywhere, and if you can't pull at those from within the bubble because of those on the outside pulling at you, then what good are you?

Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


7 replies | 8 file
New Reply on thread #12
Max 20 files0 B total