/b/ - Random

https://archive.ph/abReQ

 >>/77311/
its all happening thanks to far right conservative groups like collective shout and groups like heritage foundation to censor porn.

yeah fuck age verification. i am surprised some users here are sober enough to understand how bad this is. this is the end of private computing.

this communicates clear intent on not letting peasants use the internet and computers anymore. this could be the first step in making local computing illegal. and as covid has proven, nobody would care, nobody would stop them, nobody could say anything against this because this is not a democracy.

 >>/77324/
 >>/77336/
We should to start sharing porn collections on p2p networks to piss these assholes off. There will always be alternatives available and hopefully anons can come together in a decentralized fashion to buck this hostile takeover of the web. Torrent and p2p file sharing still exists to take maximum advantage of it.

 >>/77339/

there is already this thing called mesh, worth looking into! i had it explained to me by someone who uses it but i have so much on my plate right now i can't keep up. he has a little device that he connects with bluetooth to his phone and this device forwards messages to other devices, it does not use the internet to communicate. when anyone turns off his internet he does not give a fook, he just talks to his mesh buddies.

 >>/77324/
Both sides want censorship, the porn excuse is temporary. When the other side gets into office, age verification will be required to stop "far right extremism".

 >>/77343/
> the porn excuse is temporary

i am not so sure. i visited this chan called ourchan and the dudes are so fundemantally christian, they might genuinely think porn is the problem. they might genuinely be convinced that looking at pretty naked women is unhealthy. or they could just be husbands who are not allowed to look at other women. or they might be women who made this chan, i can only speculate.

i confronted them about it and i thought they could not defend their princples about it. respect was lost.

here is the thread.

https://www.ourchan.org/b/thread/14101.html

 >>/77343/
> Both sides want censorship, the porn excuse is temporary. When the other side gets into office, age verification will be required to stop "far right extremism".

plus yeah that's probably how these disgusting lizzardpeople plan to oppress the humans.

 >>/77344/
They're technically not wrong (as an atheist), but the solution isn't banning porn or age verification.
The real solution is making society enjoyable and fulfilling enough with the proper safeguards that people prefer healthy relationships with their spouses instead of watching sex on a screen.

It's all about gov control

 >>/77310/
So you are fine with the internet as it is now, where little kids are watching pornography on their iPads? Because officially this is what the age verification and digital ids are being intended for.

 >>/77364/
They shouldn't be on the internet at all or have iPads. Their parents should be forcing them to play outdoors instead of being stuck to a screen all day.

 >>/77364/
Honestly I don't give a fuck what kids do on their iPads, and it's the PARENTS who should be regulating those, NOT the Epstein class and their child-fucking corrupt control freak government! Just because the parents are lazy assholes who give their kids these addictive gadgets does not warrant the government to police the entire internet and our operating systems, or ruin the internet for everyone else!!!

 >>/77383/
THIS!!!

 >>/77383/
It's so ironic how the same government that wants to police the internet and surveillance everything is the same government that forces iPads in the school system in the first place!

Problem > Reaction > Solution = how convenient for them!

 >>/77345/
There is no other side.

Machiavelli was the first to envision the uniparty as the best means of having a group of tyrants who could do whatever they like and the people would never even think to rebel.

You have two parties at least, one party moves toward whatever kind of goals the elites have for themselves (democrats) while the other does nothing but oppose change (republicans), so you have one party of forward momentum toward what you want, and another party that goes nowhere and only acts as friction to slow progress toward your goals.

Then you take turns being the ones who will liberate the people from the other party, the people will welcome you in again and again to save them from the tyranny of your coconspirators, and because the young will age up and the old will age out and information is passed imperfectly from generation to generation, the result is that the people will be perpetually bounced between the two parties, who are really just two faces of one singular party, the uniparty.

Also, by making the debates over policies that the elites don't really care about be really intense between the two heads, the policies that never get talked about which the elites do care deeply about are left to be safely passed and maintained in the background.

It's all about selling the people on an enthralling story, and making them feel as though they are a part of it. The few who know the truth are left alone fighting battles nobody can see.

 >>/77425/
America will end up much like the USSR and collapse, depopulation will occur, cities will fall to ruin and become increasingly abandoned and protectionist jurisdictional power will be usurped in rural and leftover suburban communities for survival, changing the laws of the land and the consequences for outsiders who think >i dindo nuffin bruh!