/b/ - Random

https://archive.ph/abReQ

 >>/77311/
its all happening thanks to far right conservative groups like collective shout and groups like heritage foundation to censor porn.

yeah fuck age verification. i am surprised some users here are sober enough to understand how bad this is. this is the end of private computing.

this communicates clear intent on not letting peasants use the internet and computers anymore. this could be the first step in making local computing illegal. and as covid has proven, nobody would care, nobody would stop them, nobody could say anything against this because this is not a democracy.

 >>/77324/
 >>/77336/
We should to start sharing porn collections on p2p networks to piss these assholes off. There will always be alternatives available and hopefully anons can come together in a decentralized fashion to buck this hostile takeover of the web. Torrent and p2p file sharing still exists to take maximum advantage of it.

 >>/77339/

there is already this thing called mesh, worth looking into! i had it explained to me by someone who uses it but i have so much on my plate right now i can't keep up. he has a little device that he connects with bluetooth to his phone and this device forwards messages to other devices, it does not use the internet to communicate. when anyone turns off his internet he does not give a fook, he just talks to his mesh buddies.

 >>/77324/
Both sides want censorship, the porn excuse is temporary. When the other side gets into office, age verification will be required to stop "far right extremism".

 >>/77343/
> the porn excuse is temporary

i am not so sure. i visited this chan called ourchan and the dudes are so fundemantally christian, they might genuinely think porn is the problem. they might genuinely be convinced that looking at pretty naked women is unhealthy. or they could just be husbands who are not allowed to look at other women. or they might be women who made this chan, i can only speculate.

i confronted them about it and i thought they could not defend their princples about it. respect was lost.

here is the thread.

https://www.ourchan.org/b/thread/14101.html

 >>/77343/
> Both sides want censorship, the porn excuse is temporary. When the other side gets into office, age verification will be required to stop "far right extremism".

plus yeah that's probably how these disgusting lizzardpeople plan to oppress the humans.

 >>/77344/
They're technically not wrong (as an atheist), but the solution isn't banning porn or age verification.
The real solution is making society enjoyable and fulfilling enough with the proper safeguards that people prefer healthy relationships with their spouses instead of watching sex on a screen.

It's all about gov control

 >>/77310/
So you are fine with the internet as it is now, where little kids are watching pornography on their iPads? Because officially this is what the age verification and digital ids are being intended for.

 >>/77364/
They shouldn't be on the internet at all or have iPads. Their parents should be forcing them to play outdoors instead of being stuck to a screen all day.

 >>/77364/
Honestly I don't give a fuck what kids do on their iPads, and it's the PARENTS who should be regulating those, NOT the Epstein class and their child-fucking corrupt control freak government! Just because the parents are lazy assholes who give their kids these addictive gadgets does not warrant the government to police the entire internet and our operating systems, or ruin the internet for everyone else!!!

 >>/77383/
THIS!!!

 >>/77383/
It's so ironic how the same government that wants to police the internet and surveillance everything is the same government that forces iPads in the school system in the first place!

Problem > Reaction > Solution = how convenient for them!

 >>/77345/
There is no other side.

Machiavelli was the first to envision the uniparty as the best means of having a group of tyrants who could do whatever they like and the people would never even think to rebel.

You have two parties at least, one party moves toward whatever kind of goals the elites have for themselves (democrats) while the other does nothing but oppose change (republicans), so you have one party of forward momentum toward what you want, and another party that goes nowhere and only acts as friction to slow progress toward your goals.

Then you take turns being the ones who will liberate the people from the other party, the people will welcome you in again and again to save them from the tyranny of your coconspirators, and because the young will age up and the old will age out and information is passed imperfectly from generation to generation, the result is that the people will be perpetually bounced between the two parties, who are really just two faces of one singular party, the uniparty.

Also, by making the debates over policies that the elites don't really care about be really intense between the two heads, the policies that never get talked about which the elites do care deeply about are left to be safely passed and maintained in the background.

It's all about selling the people on an enthralling story, and making them feel as though they are a part of it. The few who know the truth are left alone fighting battles nobody can see.

 >>/77425/
America will end up much like the USSR and collapse, depopulation will occur, cities will fall to ruin and become increasingly abandoned and protectionist jurisdictional power will be usurped in rural and leftover suburban communities for survival, changing the laws of the land and the consequences for outsiders who think >i dindo nuffin bruh!

 >>/77425/
> You have two parties at least, one party moves toward whatever kind of goals the elites have for themselves (democrats) while the other does nothing but oppose change (republicans), so you have one party of forward momentum toward what you want, and another party that goes nowhere and only acts as friction to slow progress toward your goals.

You got this backwards, dumbass. Republicans move us closer to fascism while Democrats pretend to oppose.

 >>/77774/
Anything that isn't mandatory state enforced tranny anal rape is facism to you faggots.

 >>/77425/
This is ultimately the natural progression of all democracies, even the ancient Greeks knew it, but we continue to be arrogant and pursue delusional beliefs such as "all people should have the right to vote".

The eventual collapse of the West isn't a problem to fix, but the actual solution. We can only hope that it is enough of a deterrent to future civilizations so they don't follow in our footsteps.

 >>/77347/
> The real solution is making society enjoyable and fulfilling enough with the proper safeguards that people prefer healthy relationships with their spouses instead of watching sex on a screen.

but in the absence of such a place by limiting the access to sexuality on the screen you are defacto limiting human sexuality, which is what evil religion has done to humanity for centuries and look how retarded the people came out that have the misfortune of having to conform to their parents irresponsible strict religious upbringing.

average mainstream organized religion member isn't like tucker, average mainstream organized religion member is a chore and a burden and part of that is the slow trickle of brainwash, mindrape, expectation of conformity and limitation of sexuality. 

centrally organized human society can never be more then trash. you can clean it up and make it look good when china comes for a visit, make the stores look like they are full of desirable products and hire good looking actors to pretend to be employees but eventually all the people in it will envy the homeless they seek to hide from the chinese.

Murena hero webp
(30.91 KB, 954x954)

From phones I can recommend Fairphone 6 but get the degoogled /e/OS version.

https://www.fairphone.com/the-fairphone-gen-6-e-operating-system

especially if you're in Europe because I don't think Fairphone is supported by North American operators still

 >>/77777/
Religion isn't evil though. Keep in mind that 50% of all people have a below average IQ. Religion is an evolutionary adaptation that conscious beings have developed to keep those retards in check.

> look how retarded the people came out that have the misfortune of having to conform to their parents irresponsible strict religious upbringing
This has less to do with religion as a whole, it's a byproduct of the twisted beliefs of the Abrahamaic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam). Those were desert religions for roaming nomadic tribes that hijacked the Roman Empire when it became a nation of primarily non-Romans.

 >>/77779/
> Religion isn't evil though. 
religion in it self as a product for the masses to approach spirituality might not necessarily be evil but organized religion in it's perverted role as the gatekeeper to god most certainly is. it betrays the desperation/disconnectedness of people too unconscious to know better for having a better life and funnels those people back to the plantation and teaches them to sacrifice themselves and do as they are told so that the powerful people can order them around like pawns on a chessboard; which unfortunately is the fate of most big groups. groups just produce mindless cannonfodder.

> Keep in mind that 50% of all people have a below average IQ. Religion is an evolutionary adaptation that conscious beings have developed to keep those retards in check.

that's a disgusting way to deal with it. there are enough positive principles in all the major religions to genuinely facilitate positive evolution. they should seek to elevate people and make them more conscious, not trap them in mental shackles while training them to be absent-minded compliant accomplices who do as they are told. religion tricks idiots to participate in the war against themselves and you call the people who wage this war conscious beings...

 >>/77779/
Religion isn't evil but it's the retards who take it so seriously that can easily become evil because of radicalization. THAT is the problem. Let the people believe whatever they want but as soon as someone decides to kill in the name of their religion then lock those retarded son of a bitches up in prison.

Does anyone get the feeling that if our overlords decreed that everyone must have their thumbs amputated, Americans would agree that the law makes sense and must be obeyed?

 >>/77808/
Those retards always exist, with or without religion. The reddit atheists were also religious and were just as obnoxious.

 >>/77784/
Religion isn't a construct that was artificially created by humans. Its something that evolved as a part of gaining consciousness that allows humans to organize and behave in a coherent group. It predates governments, and is as fundamental as race.

> they should seek to elevate people and make them more conscious
not all people are worthy of being elevated. That's how evolution works. The dumb ones, the anti-social ones, they struggle to adapt to these social rules. Consequently, they are less likely to be successful, reproduce, etc.

 >>/77808/
Talked to christians who preach on the corner, it consisted of a nigger a spic a pajeet and two whites.

The Christian church has always been on the side of racemix

It was the Christians in America who were the strongest lobby for freeing the slaves and integrating them into white societies

It was Christians who were making the strongest case for mass migration before the migrant crisis

And now all of a sudden some online Christians are changing to support the far right because if they don't attach to the political trends they won't get any chance of survival

But the vast majority of right wing Christians are of the civnat or christnat positions that day it's totally fine for white genocide to continue so long as they come in legally and believe in the same religion

Not a fan

 >>/77891/
I take issue with the words of Christ also, Christians on here like to isolate parts of his words and take the meaning out of the context of where they were said (helps to know what hes saying when we get what hes referring to from the scenario) and what his English quote was translated from (and how the original words were used within the bible before that point).

But if you take Christ's words in full you see that Jesus was the inspiration for many of Karl Marx's ideas on how to create a communist society.

Plenty of the policies Marx had presented are blatant quotations ripped off from Jesus Christ in the bible.

Also the fact that Christianity has existed for a long time within the European world is true but mitigated with the addition that most Europeans were biblically ignorant and just getting their religion fed to them from a politically motivated church authority.

furthermore there was little choice since the church held everyone under threat for daring to go against them.

Screenshot From... png
(1.01 MB, 1114x744)

 >>/77891/
> white genocide

not real thoughbeit

It won't happen and cannot possibly be enforced. Too many ways around it today. Anyone can have access to bootable ISOs, hundreds of Linux distros are currently distributed and shared over bit torrent and various file sharing networks, millions of copies of older Windows and Macintosh operating systems still exist and even still selling on sites like Ebay, not to mention all those Windows bootlegs that come preactivated. I don't see how this can possibly be enforced even with the most severe attempts to crackdown rebellion will always exist.