/baaa2/ - Autism

Dunking on the mentally ill


New Reply on thread #41687
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]

thumbnail of mascote-pm-amigo-legal-da-policia-militar-de-mg-logo-png_seeklogo-563130.png
thumbnail of mascote-pm-amigo-legal-da-policia-militar-de-mg-logo-png_seeklogo-563130.png
mascote-pm-amigo-lega... png
(63.2 KB, 1000x1000)

















No. 41802 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/41800/
Nope, not "five years". Jampacked is already finished, now I need to produce its visuals. 

You. Don't. Get. To. See. Them. 
 >>/41801/
That's not a philosophy from anyoen but you, you're jealous because I have a clear grasp on filmmaking/producing, and don't derive the content like your failed toilet man pilot.










No. 41865 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/41845/
But I'm self-taught, and even those kind of artists search and learn from tutorials. Sometimes they don't, but most of the time they do that any once in a  while. They don't just magically "draw" something and go "oh hey i improved" or whatever, even if it's not a changed art style; it should still go to show that, they're an artist. No matter if it looks like shit, inaccurate or not...(almsot depending on it ofc). They are an artist. If they have an effective art style that DOESN'T grow old, is timeless, then yes. It is a unique art style. It may be different over time, but hey what do I have to do a fucking faker like you for? 

My main point is, I *have* actually studied.. I've read posts. I just don't need to show off which specific ones I look at. That's why you're fucking stupid.

No. 41866 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/41861/
No one is even talking about masturbation. It isn't illegal, immoral, nor wrong to do it at all, nor is it unhealthy. 

Anyone believeing otherwise is a fucked person that need to be in rubber rooms or something. they don't deserve air. Same goes for antis who can't into blocking or ignoring things they don't like; no wonder they're unreasonable about "cub porn" being children. 

Does a child act like a fictional character? No.
























No. 42030 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/41966/
You are NOT sarcastic at all, if you weren't a kinkshamer you would not keep calling it "infantile" to a commonly, sexually, and emotionally charged fetish in fiction. 

Bet you'd say the same thing about fat furries too

 >>/41967/
I don't think of abusing "women" though. This is opposite. 
> you have something to ge- 
What's to get off a chest if I'm only liking fictional violence? In other words of your shitty translating skills: I find it hot that a fictional cat gets beat up by another fictional cat, even so if they're wearing huge pudgy diapers. Sprigatito sure gets me hard when they're beat up. 

How's that sound, douchebag?


No. 42037 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
forgot to post it in another languge: 
Ich finde es heiß, wenn eine fiktive Katze von einer anderen fiktiven Katze geschlagen wird, selbst wenn sie riesige dicke Windeln trägt. Sprigatito macht mich definitiv hart, selbst wenn sie verletzt werden. In Kombination mit Windeln und heiliger Mama ist das super attraktiv. 

 >>/42032/
"People" as in yourself? Okay, you not only act a child but you almost pretend to be multiple of people. By reposting the same thing.




Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:

57 replies | 50 file
New Reply on thread #41687
Max 20 files0 B total
[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]