/lv/ - Libre Vidya

video games in freedom


New Thread
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Thread]

Page: Prev [1] [2] Next | [Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]


thumbnail of GNU_STALLMAN QUEST.webm
thumbnail of GNU_STALLMAN QUEST.webm
GNU_STALLMAN QUEST webm
(13.4 MB, 640x356 vp8)
Postal1
https://bitbucket.org/gopostal/postal-1-open-source/src

Destination Sol
https://github.com/MovingBlocks/DestinationSol

Blackvoxel
http://www.blackvoxel.com/

Valyria Tear
https://github.com/ValyriaTear/ValyriaTear

Hexoshi - metroid clone
https://github.com/ValyriaTear/ValyriaTear



Hungarian RTS
https://github.com/akarnokd/open-ig

Star Trek Voyager FPS
https://mega.nz/#!NSgjRQQS!ca0L4yw4nW3T8xox4Y3pkTQgCtabDuM1o781-Yg_J38

Bomberman clone
https://github.com/Javanaise/mrboom-libretro

Yorg racing
http://www.ya2.it/yorg/




thumbnail of 1570108632347.jpg
thumbnail of 1570108632347.jpg
1570108632347 jpg
(539.76 KB, 1600x900)
Dear Russkies. Of the Nizy Novogrod region and all other regions.
You have been maliciously kicked out of Linux Kernel by a faggot.

Please instead help Chaos Esque Anthology 3d project know more map formats.
It is in C. Quake based.
We have coded Wolfenstine:Enemy Territory BSP support into it, and 4 million entity networking.

It can also generate cities, which you can fight in, we did much 3d modeling and coding. You can enter the buildings.

We know you won't help. No one does.
But it is true opensource, before the women joined, before the trans-gays, before all of that. Just programmers.

https://sourceforge.net/p/chaosesqueanthology/tickets/5/
https://sourceforge.net/p/chaosesqueanthology/tickets/2/
We dream of having Unreal and Unreal Tournament 1997/1999 map support (bsp), and valve BSP support.

The game allready has been edited to allow obj-as-map support (see the on-disc (ISO) git repos that come with the game: all the code is there, as are some binaries in the other GIT folder on the disc with the newer builds.), so the modern way of LIDAR scan for a map is supported allready. As are exports of obj from minetest and mine*raft and obj exports from bzflag as maps.

We know you won't help us.
But we figured we would ask.
Russians look good and are pretty.

This is just a hobby game. Has 200+ weapons, 30 (or really 65) vehicles, 100+ maps, magic, etc etc. If you would help us... well no one helps us.

Everyone is a feminist woman worshiping faggot piece of fucking shit. We have to do everything ourselves. Faggots became trannies. Trannies banned you Russians. Trannies did this. They did this to you. Do not forget that.

Anyway I will put this through translator. It will probably be unreadable.
44 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer







thumbnail of 10791.jpg
thumbnail of 10791.jpg
10791 jpg
(431.26 KB, 1600x900)
ChaosEsque Anthology is a first person shooter. It is a standalone modification of Xonotic which includes extended weapons, maps, vehicles, buildable buildings, mounted weapons, spell casting, monsters, player characters, textures, and game modes.

It has over 100 maps. Some are futuristic, some are ancient, and some are medieval. A few evoke platform games such as sonic, others follow a style more akin to diablo. Some are static maps, others are randomly connected.

There is something to fit your mood. There are mutators that can add mounted weapons in any map, buildings, monsters, foliage, hazards, and even balloons and bumpers. You can fight with futuristic weapons, medieval weapons, and /or hand to hand combat (over 100 weapons). There are also many vehicles (and a mutator to spawn them in maps that do not have them, as is tradition (as you can see)).

You can also set each team to start with different specific weapons if you want to test a theory that you could defeat a well equipped military force with your bolt action rifle or crossbow. Same with vehicles and mounted weapons spawning (you can set which spawn near which team in CTF etc). You can drink wine, potions, learn magic, read scrolls, so on and so forth.

The goal, and much of this has been reached, is to not limit the player.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/chaosesqueanthology/
249 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer







thumbnail of __hakurei_reimu_and_cirno_touhou_drawn_by_nvi2762__sample-866367c766d98154f4bf0d017de9214e.jpg
thumbnail of __hakurei_reimu_and_cirno_touhou_drawn_by_nvi2762__sample-866367c766d98154f4bf0d017de9214e.jpg
__hakurei_reimu_and_c... jpg
(49.63 KB, 850x547)
thumbnail of redcirno.jpg
thumbnail of redcirno.jpg
redcirno jpg
(197.55 KB, 1024x1024)
While the end-user player license remains the same as previous versions, Xonotic has added to it's developers license a no-pedophile rule .
*[1]

Some might say "this isn't a license change". 
A license is permission. Xonotic has voted on, and agreed to this new rule.
It may very well be found by a court to be a license change for developers.

> THEY CAN'T DO THAT
They did.
> THE GPL DOESNT ALLOW THAT!
Got 500k to fight it out?
Also they'll claim their change isn't in the end-user license (but it is an enforced rule, which was voted on and agreed to by the other copyright holders in the Xonotic 0.9 team, and the steering committee): which may amount, by court ruling, to a change in the developer license.
> THIS ISNT A LICENSE CHANGE
It is clear that the community has voted on, including the other copyright holders (though derivative) of various pieces, to enact a no-pedophile rule for Xonotic 0.9 etc.

It cannot be said that it is totally non-enforceable: the copyright holders to the derivative work Xonotic 0.9 (derivative of earlier versions of Xonotic, which is derivative of Nexuiz, which is derivative of an earlier half-life mod, All of which is a derivative work of Quake1 (the engine especially, and much of the Quake C (game) code in Xonotic)), have made clear their feelings about pedophiles working on their project, and have voted to exclude atleast one person.

Darkplaces also, on it's discord, posts a no-pedophile developers rule.[2]
These can be seen as license changes.

They are Additional Writings outside of the original License text that, none-the-less, govern the real-world redaction of the subject Work. They also speak to the intent of the current developers/derivative-copyright-holders. Which is to exclude the class of pedophile programmer and developers. That is the intent of these additional writings.

Additionally these changes have been enforced (Both in Darkplaces*, and Xonotic), which would further enduice the intent and meaning of these added rules to indeed disallow pedophiles from working on the work: https://mircea-kitsune.livejournal.com/27604.html 
:
> a warning to other developers here to be careful, for your team may ban you from working on your own code if someone doesn't like what you said
4 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer
 >>/7/
In a New York Copyright case, a licensee had a bargained-for commercial copyright license without any revocation clause. Never-the-less when the licensor and licensees began to have disagreements and they got so heated as to cause emotive death threats to be uttered: the court found that the copyright license contract was then canceled. They found that the disagreements precluded further existence of the license.

Same thing can apply here with Kitsune.
Do you disagree with the NY court on this?

 >>/10/

>     Why do you reply with basically the same message over and over?

I didn't. You have ignored my reference to the NY court.

>     You are not even considering or refuting my specific point.

Because it is wrong
> that is, the GPL ("License.txt") ONLY governs the CODE and BINARIES of the project.
"License.txt" is not the only writing stating the intentions of the rights-holders in existence anymore.
You are asserting that it is a fully-integrated (one page) "agreement".
When there are now multiple writings stating the intended disposition regarding the permission the rights holders are granting.
In some of these they state they do not want certain classes of persons to be using their code.

> The GPL cannot be revoked retroactively.
Yes it can be, from a free taker.
Lulirama Ltd. v. Axcess Broad. Servs., Inc., 128 F.3d 872, 882 (5th Cir. 1997);
> ("[N]onexclusive licenses are revocable absent consideration."). Where consideration is present, however, the license is irrevocable, and "[t]his is so because a nonexclusive license supported by consideration is a contract.


> Jacobsen v. Katzer
Have you read Jacobsen v. Katzer? The 9th circuit appellate court ruled that the Artistic License was /not/ a contract, and was instead a simple copyright license. It found that the lower court erred in construing the Artistic License as a contract, and reversed the lower courts finding: telling the lower court that the Artistic License is not a contract.

That is, if anything, supportive of the "revokists" position.

 >>/14/

>     not the author, but can't consideration also be immaterial?

No. Go FUCK yourself.

>     the publisher of GPL software is giving you software (material good)

No they are not. They are granting permission to use and distribute their Copyrighted Work. They are not giving you anything.

>     and the consumer of the GPL software is given the publisher the promise of following the GPL

No: you do not have an independent right to use or distribute the Work.
You have a pre-existing duty to follow US Copyright law.
You are granted permission by the Copyright holder to distribute the work and use the work
YOU DO NOT HAVE A FUCKING INDEPENDENT RIGHT TO FUCKING DO SO. DO YOU GET THAT ZOOMER F_UCKING_ FAGGOT?

Ofcourse not.

Now this permission is limited. The limits on that permission are stated in the memorandum (GPL): that it is not to be distributed if one is preventing others from doing so down the line etc. You DO NOT have a prior right to distribute or use AT ALL.

So: for these LIMITED permissions (up from _NO___ PERMISSION AT FUCKING ALL) you have given:

1) Nothing
And according to you
2) A Promise to follow Copyright Law.
Which fails because that is a pre-existing duty.

FAGGOT FUCK.

thumbnail of ScreenshotBBS.png
thumbnail of ScreenshotBBS.png
Screenshot... png
(1.03 MB, 1920x4604)
 >>/14/
> Artifex v. Hancom
Have you read Artifex v. Hancom? In Artifex, a lower court decision in the 9th circuit, the court failed to properly identify the GPL, instead confusing "The GPL" with the preliminary offer to do business which gave the prospective licensee an option of a paid proprietary license contract or the GPL. The court in Artifex gave the copyright holder the option of proceeding on a contract law claim of damages, with regards to the offer of the proprietary license contract OR (but not both) to proceed on a federal copyright violation claim for violation of the GPL copyright license. If the GPL itself was a contract, the court would require the copyright holder to proceed under a contract law claim only. (They like to limit damages when they can). The parties elected to settle, and the case went no further.

thumbnail of ScreenshotsBBS.png
thumbnail of ScreenshotsBBS.png
Screenshot... png
(1.13 MB, 1920x5168)
 >>/14/ 
> and the consumer of the GPL software is given the publisher the promise of following the GPL
Wrong.
The "consumer" is trying to gain the limited permission granted in the GPL. He is not trying to "get" the software. He's trying to get permission that are written in the GPL.

For the limited permissions a License grants (which is what he is trying to get) (the copyright holder is NOT offering the copyright itself (copyright transfer)) usually a licensee will pay money.

YOU DO NOT HAVE AN INDEPENDENT PERMISSION TO "violate" THE LICENSE GRANT.
So you "following" the limits in the grant is not you GIVING anything.

Do you get that, faggot?
DO YOU GET THAT?

No you don't.

-----
Simply: you are trying to buy the permissions listed in the license memorandum.
For this you pay nothing.

You retort that if it weren't for you obeying the license grant; you could distribute, modify, and molest the software in any way you wish.
Which is untrue: Copyright Law grants you zero rights (all rights reserved). And you have a pre-existing duty to follow it.

-----
Simpler:
A little girl child has a flute.
Should you rape her? And take her flute?

Because you promise not to rape her and enslave her as a bride: you are entitled to that flute. Consideration has been paid. 
According to you.

But is it so?



thumbnail of tuxsun.jpg
thumbnail of tuxsun.jpg
tuxsun jpg
(181.75 KB, 1024x768)



thumbnail of xrctfy_xcity.jpg
thumbnail of xrctfy_xcity.jpg
xrctfy_xcity jpg
(352.52 KB, 891x902)
> https://www.moddb.com/games/chaosesqueanthology

>  Game Over

> The game you are trying to view has been deleted and is no longer available. This may have occurred at the developers request because it is no longer active and was not released, or it may have occurred because it violated the sites Terms of Use. If this is a mistake and you are a member of this games team and would like it re-activated, please contact us with the details.

> Continue browsing the game list, to find the profile you are after.


> Account Banned

> Your account has been banned. If you believe this is a mistake and want to be unbanned, please contact us. Try searching:
3 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer



thumbnail of afghan-girl-and-marine.png
thumbnail of afghan-girl-and-marine.png
afghan-girl-and-marine png
(682.58 KB, 1000x658)
https://archive.wakarimasen.moe/his/thread/10697314/#q10698118

> " >>/10698046/
> Not really in context, he is “married in according to the law”, and while he is not allowed to live with his “new wife”, he is now banned from marrying anyone else. And that only if her father consent to it, which is to be supposed out of Exodus 22:16, it being not likely that the father should lose his paternal right of disposing his child when she was in some sort forced, rather than when she was enticed. 

Wrong, Dipshit. Devarim chapter 22 verse 28 is NOT Exodus 22:16. Devarim chapter 22 verse 28 is about raping female children. And yes the man DOES keep the girl: she is now a woman of his. And, NO, dipshit: he is not "barred from "marrying" anyone else". There is NO limit to the number of female a man may be the ba'al (master) of in YHWH's law.

Notice how the white faggot fucking chirstians always corrupt YHWH's law to be pro-woman and anti-man.
Notice it?

In Devarim it DOES NOT SAY "DURRR SHE BECOMES HIS WHOIFE, AND HE CANT MARRY ANYONE ELSE!!!, AND HE DOESN'T KEEP HER!!!! DURRR"

No. It makes NO mention of "wives" "marraige" and other concepts white PIECES OF SHIT believe in. It says if a man rapes (tahpahs (as in to take: to take a city)) a little girl who is still in her fathers house; and they are discovered; and the little girl was not promised to someone else; then the man pays the father 50 pieces of silver, and she is his female; and he shall not send her away from himself all of his days because he has humiliated her.

So yes: He has forcibly raped a small female child (this is what humiliates (humbles)) in her fathers house. He does not send her away.

But white fucks think "DURRR THIS IS BAD FOR MUHHH WHOITE WHHHHHHUUUUHHHHHMAN".
Tell me: white fucking pieces of shit: How can one "not send her away" if one doesn't come into posession of the girl. DipSHIT FUCK.
How does a girl become one's female (posessive) if one cannot possess her? HMMM WHITE FUCK. Going to tell us you PIECES OF FUCKING SHIT?




thumbnail of feris.jpg
thumbnail of feris.jpg
feris jpg
(12.3 KB, 236x314)
Xonotic removes "team members" (developer) for insulting people.

>  Well... strong words are not disallowed, but using strong words to insult others (players or developers alike) falls under invective.
>  Like, you can call a core gameplay mechanic of first person shooters "shitscan" all you like, that's allowed.
>  But the moment you attack the people, a line has been crossed.

This is what you get for contributing code etc to opensource: Judged and "sanctioned". You're seen as no-better than a non-contributor/player.

>  https://forums.xonotic.org/showthread.php?tid=8522
>  https://xonotic.devfull.de/xonvote:27500/poll/405

--

divVerent supports sawing off the dicks of kids
"if a doctor approves"
>  if a doctor diagnoses a condition that can be helped by SRS, and "whoever is legally responsible" (depending on age and jurisdiction, parent and/or child) consents
>  there's no problem
>  wasnt that famous kid jazz reassigned as a kid?
>  that's just HIS JOB

--

Xonotic main dev:
> Rudolf Polzer - Senior Software Engineer - Google 
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rudolf-polzer-99122418

Engine developer chopped his dick and balls off:
>  Ashley Hale - Software Engineer - DarkPlaces 
>  https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashley-hale-7723648
This person used to be Forest Hale. Works at Google now. Joined Google before Rudolf Polzer did. Probably got him in.
thumbnail of 57_cab623ab-bab8-437e-a07e-864aec08dfb6.jpg
thumbnail of 57_cab623ab-bab8-437e-a07e-864aec08dfb6.jpg
57_cab623ab-ba... jpg
(43.43 KB, 380x500)
> However, nonexclusive licenses are revocable (meaning the copyright owner can revoke the license at any time) in the absence of consideration. 
> https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/creating-written-contract-transfer-or-license-rights-under-copyright

>  [...] The most plausible assumption is that a developer who releases 
>  code under the GPL may terminate GPL rights, probably at will.
>  --David McGowan, Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School:

> p278 "Notice that in a copyright dispute over a bare license, the
> plaintiff will almost certainly be the copyright owner. If a licensee
> were foolish enough to sue to enforce the terms and conditions of the
> license, the licensor can simply revoke the bare license, thus ending
> the dispute. Remeber that a bare license in the absence of an interest
> is revocable."
> --Lawrence Rosen
> https://www.amazon.com/Open-Source-Licensing-Software-Intellectual/dp/013148787



thumbnail of OpenGL_500-500x215.png
thumbnail of OpenGL_500-500x215.png
OpenGL_500-500x215 png
(47.2 KB, 500x215)
The adage about 'linux brings old hardware back to life' is now false when it comes to games. I remember Mikee complaining about this a few years back but it's reached near full saturation at this point. Free software games have pretty much abandoned OpenGL 2 support, so any old c2d laptops are not playing any modern updates to games. OpenGL 3+ will never run on these chipsets so MESA won't try. I recently faced this fact trying to run OpenRA on an old c2d laptop for LAN purposes and was left agasp by this: https://www.openra.net/news/playtest-20200329/
> We note that OpenGL 3.2 or OpenGL ES 3 are now required. Moving away from OpenGL 2 is important for future compatibility with modern rendering APIs (Vulkan/Metal). This does unfortunately mean dropping support for some older systems (typically 10+ years old) that currently can run OpenRA, but we believe that this is a necessary tradeoff for the future.
I was then surprised trying to run a few other 2d games on this hardware, it really does seem the community are abandoning old hardware.

thumbnail of supertux.jpg
thumbnail of supertux.jpg
supertux jpg
(74.36 KB, 640x480)
It's worse than you think.  They're forcing the OpenGL into games (and also emulators) that don't need it and used to run fine with just software rendering on computers from 20 years ago.
Here's just one example.  This version runs great on my slow armv7 board that boots /dev/fb0 at 640x480, without the proprietary Mali GPU driver.
So anyway, now I archive old versions of the games and emulators I like, and ignore all the new ones.

thumbnail of 1424212605876.jpg
thumbnail of 1424212605876.jpg
1424212605876 jpg
(98.97 KB, 800x629)
ChaosEsque uses a version of the Darkplaces engine forked 10 years ago (right before they broke rendering on old intel integrated GPUs). It ports over some features from time to time.

Additionally we did some more intensive hacking on the engine and extended the 32k entity limit to a new maximum of 4 million networkable entities. We had requested this before but were told that "it's too hard to change all the darkplaces internals to support this". It wasn't too hard for us. It did take 3 weeks of investigation and tracing of the uncommented code.

Our version also retains "LordHavoc"s actual given name: Forest Hale, in the credits. Not his new "sawn-off-dick-and-balls-one-year-after-joining-google" (ashley rose 'LadyHavoc' Hale). As our fork predates any of that.

Additionally: our fork of Xonotic predates Xonotic itself: the rcal pistol and various other changes were from the Nexuiz days. We also are the ones who campaigned for Nexuiz to be forked in the first place (since LordHavoc was CHOPPING off weapons from the game): So yes: we are responsible for all of it to begin with.

FTE dev was mad
https://rbt.asia/g/thread/80439845/#

< eukara> really getting desperate using a russian proxy, why even bother posting when nobody wants to hear what you have to say?
>  you end up banned. every. single. time.
>  I've never been banned
>  anyway I did what you couldn't or wouldn't
>  4 million ents in DP
>  you're fucked in the head, right?
>  suck on it faggot dick chopping-supporter
>  nope
>  clearly
>  I'm a licensed attorney.
>  what are you?
>  prove it
>  you're making a lot of assumptions about others being inferior to you, when you do not know them and you're clearly an egolomaniac
>  but you could never exercise power over another adult, that's why you target kids
>  you disgusting prick
>  you're just as simple to figure out as any other insane person.
>  and clearly you're not a good attorney, because why else have so much time on your hands modding Nexuiz of all things.
>  like wow, no life confirmed!
>  eukara: I'm not like you: I don't have to work.
>  I just do my hobbies
>  because you don't have work.
>  you're a fake.
>  you have accomplished nothing.
>  4 million entities says otherwise.
>  not a single person knows or cares that you exist.
>  and my marble floors say otherwise :)
>  you don't put your real name out, people won't remember your alts.
>  the purpose to do the thing is the thing itself.
>  so 'doing your hobbies' 'not having to work' is worth bragging about, when it's clear you're not doing any goodwill



>  no one cares about 4 million entities in Darkplaces. Nobody sane would ever need that many visible entities.
>  that's unplayable over the network.
>  but you don't care about that. in your little head you think you've figured it all out.
>  and I'm wrong.
>  funnily enough, you used my code from FTE to make this work. So no, you're a talentless, worthless hack.
>  go away.
>  Be a Narcissist in your own 4 walls.
>  ill be with you in a moment
> ~eukara 46.23.94.114 


< starsomething> ill be with you in a moment
>  Glad your mad I used your algo :)
>  pound that sand boy!
>  it just proves you have no talent.
>  you can even revoke the license to use it and sue me :)

thumbnail of xonotic20210306060956-00.jpg
thumbnail of xonotic20210306060956-00.jpg
xonotic20210306060956... jpg
(186.83 KB, 1366x768)
> 08:03  Juhu: any thoughts on the fork? Parts of it are older than Xonotic.
> 08:04  (Ex: the first weapon I added: the pistol, and some of my maps, etc)
> 08:04  div0 used to help me with things
> 08:05  Juhu: I convinced divVerent to implement crypto in the engine, and also to implement warpzones (like in unreal and  UT99), and fakelight shading, and showsurfaces 3
> 08:05  Juhu: I paid him too. My whole paycheque many times back then.
> 08:06  Juhu: so these fucking people they pretend I contributed nothing: when I actually both inspired development and paid for it 
> 08:06  /before/ I even got good at it myself
> 08:07  Juhu: so these fucking people they laugh at me, they spit at me: while they use features I paid to have written



thumbnail of 1449829086577.gif
thumbnail of 1449829086577.gif
1449829086577 gif
(214.03 KB, 640x480)
> 08:03  Juhu: any thoughts on the fork? Parts of it are older than Xonotic.
> 08:04  (Ex: the first weapon I added: the pistol, and some of my maps, etc)
> 08:04  div0 used to help me with things
> 08:05  Juhu: I convinced divVerent to implement crypto in the engine, and also to implement warpzones (like in unreal and  UT99), and fakelight shading, and showsurfaces 3
> 08:05  Juhu: I paid him too. My whole paycheque many times back then.
> 08:06  Juhu: so these fucking people they pretend I contributed nothing: when I actually both inspired development and paid for it 
> 08:06  /before/ I even got good at it myself
> 08:07  Juhu: so these fucking people they laugh at me, they spit at me: while they use features I paid to have written


thumbnail of 1468627597183.png
thumbnail of 1468627597183.png
1468627597... png
(456.01 KB, 626x1252)
FTE dev was mad
https://rbt.asia/g/thread/80439845/#

< eukara> really getting desperate using a russian proxy, why even bother posting when nobody wants to hear what you have to say?
>  you end up banned. every. single. time.
>  I've never been banned
>  anyway I did what you couldn't or wouldn't
>  4 million ents in DP
>  you're fucked in the head, right?
>  suck on it faggot dick chopping-supporter
>  nope
>  clearly
>  I'm a licensed attorney.
>  what are you?
>  prove it
>  you're making a lot of assumptions about others being inferior to you, when you do not know them and you're clearly an egolomaniac
>  but you could never exercise power over another adult, that's why you target kids
>  you disgusting prick
>  you're just as simple to figure out as any other insane person.
>  and clearly you're not a good attorney, because why else have so much time on your hands modding Nexuiz of all things.
>  like wow, no life confirmed!
>  eukara: I'm not like you: I don't have to work.
>  I just do my hobbies
>  because you don't have work.
>  you're a fake.
>  you have accomplished nothing.
>  4 million entities says otherwise.
>  not a single person knows or cares that you exist.
>  and my marble floors say otherwise :)
>  you don't put your real name out, people won't remember your alts.
>  the purpose to do the thing is the thing itself.
>  so 'doing your hobbies' 'not having to work' is worth bragging about, when it's clear you're not doing any goodwill



>  no one cares about 4 million entities in Darkplaces. Nobody sane would ever need that many visible entities.
>  that's unplayable over the network.
>  but you don't care about that. in your little head you think you've figured it all out.
>  and I'm wrong.
>  funnily enough, you used my code from FTE to make this work. So no, you're a talentless, worthless hack.
>  go away.
>  Be a Narcissist in your own 4 walls.
>  ill be with you in a moment
> ~eukara 46.23.94.114 


< starsomething> ill be with you in a moment
>  Glad your mad I used your algo :)
>  pound that sand boy!
>  it just proves you have



Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


0 replies | 0 file
New Thread
Max 20 files0 B total
Refresh

Page: Prev [1] [2] Next | [Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]