/operate/ - Endchan Operations

 >>/20048/
I think we missed your post due to the flood.
Those options control how "wide" of a subnet gets banned. Narrow is /24, wide is /16.
Let's say the IP is 12.24.232.198
Then the narrow range is: 12.24.232.0
The wide: 12.24.0.0
Here's wikipee article about the topic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subnet

 >>/29156/
Thanks, I'll pass it on.

It seems to me the "Scrub media (remove image from site)" option when deleting posts is no longer working correctly. When I delete posts with this option checked the files are no longer removed from the server as they were before and still remain accessible with the direct link to the image. This is a problem.

 >>/29192/
I'm not aware that BOs/BVs could scrub. I thought scrubbing is a global option (since it could effect more than one board.)
Board staff can use the remove media, to remove just the media from the post. This doesn't delete it from the db ofc.

 >>/29193/
I'm pretty sure it used to work even as BO/BV. Because before when I deleted posts with that option checked, the image could no longer be accessed even if someone had the direct link.

 >>/29194/
Maybe we just scrubbed those. We do vet orphans and there's automatic deletion too. Also if it's a cp spam, that posted across the boards, it could happen that you delete on your board, and right after we delete (we always use scrub in those cases) then it could seem you scrubbed.

 >>/29163/
In /bb

 >>/29163/
 >>/29164/
I can't. BO/BV can.

 >>/29163/
Note: when you post an alert window pops up which says you are banned. Write an appeal in the empty input box.

 >>/29184/
It didn't help :(((

 >>/29188/
Perhaps they don't read reports.
But perhaps they don't read it, because the report page is stuffed full with fake reports.

I understand the issue, I've never seen it either.
I don't know if we can reproduce it - so we can test it and fix it. If it is random occurrence it seems to be very rare.
If you came across it again, let us know first and leave the post up, Odili is needed to check the ban output and see what doesn't work. After you can delete it ofc.

 >>/29142/
> First pic

nahh they hate Christianity with a passion.

 >>/19823/
Confirmed, gonna do something about it. Thanks.

123 png
(196.64 KB, 677x547)

i can sit here only with VPN, banned in my country

 >>/29136/
Bans and logins aren't connected. Even if your VPN is banned globally you should still be able to log in if you have an account.

 >>/29136/
I also have to raise the possibility that you're account was hacked and your pw got changed.

 >>/29139/
Role signo

 >>/29097/
not a lot. It's always a question of when you get hacked not if. 

Their source code is a fun read, I can compare that with the rebuild copy I have. Going to take some time.

 >>/29097/
also I'm not the site owner

Holy crap I haven't seen you in forevar

cant post on any other boards

hi hungaryball or o'dilly dilly. we're trying to get one of our regular posters to post with us on >>>/bert/ , but he says he's rangebanned site wide on endchan right now. it wasn't one of my bans that I enacted on the board that caused it. he managed to post here just a couple of days earlier before 4chan was back up.

 >>/29125/
We have no active sitewide rangebans.
What's his error message?
There is this thing for example:
https://endchan.org/operate/res/11813.html
He can posts screenshots here if necessary:
https://wrongthink.net/endchan/
If IP is showing on the screenshot, blur/edit that out.

 >>/29126/
thanks for the quick answer. he says he gets the following message:
> when I try to post it display "you're banned for spam" message

 >>/29127/
He should have a "Write your appeal" field or similar. Write the appeal. Don't need to be long, but make it clear.

thank you
there's more
https://endchan.org/agatha2/res/88815.html#q135401

 >>/29115/
Why?

 >>/29116/
Why not🌚

Anyway I take a look at your board, OP, time to times and I rarely find anything that could cross the line.

image jpg
(1.5 MB, 3088x2320)

 >>/29107/
> doesn’t look good

HAHAHAHA

Seeing you faggots suck off the government is incredible.  I want to fuck children, mark me nigga

 >>/29106/
Okay, thank you for clarifying. I will post this on my board if you don't mind so that the users know better going forward. We'd all been under the assumption it was ostensibly anything goes so as long as it's fictional, so it initially seemed like we'd just gotten on your nerves. Sorry for the confusion. 

I'm going to assume that characters who would be teens in-series but could feasibly be interpreted as 18 or older in fanart are fine, since most artists just say they're 18 in the drawings anyways.

Does being logged in affect this at all? I just wanted to say, don't mistake the self identifying sex offender for me, thanks.

 >>/29109/
Mark you the 100 teeth pitbull.

 >>/29110/
> I will post this on my board
Sure. Feel free to link the thread too.
> who would be teens in-series but could feasibly be interpreted as 18 or older in fanart
Not easy to answer that. The key probably is the "childlike characters", which is kinda hard to say in case of drawn characters. Anime is especially bad in this.
One problem is if I try to write here a concrete definition some tard will appear who will push the boundaries and tries to rulelawyer it. Sometimes young looking but 18+ porn actresses are posted in context that implies underage content. Then the troll fake complains for the content was deleted.
Use sensible judgement.

 >>/29111/
That's okay. I reply to posts, not to users. At least the general aim is that, and anonymity should be about this anyway.