/operate/ - Endchan Operations

I don't need this shit. It's not ok to change these things without askin other ppls' opinion, imo

 >>/19258/
Why sir?

Okay

 >>/23566/
 >>/11540/
the nature of the issue requires an impartial evaluation, I don't think it would meet that requirement if it were to be discussed among the user base. thanks for the info

 >>/23637/
Already tried

 >>/12076/
The password for deletion is whatever you entered into the password field when making the post.

 >>/12076/
If you did not enter anything, you can't delete it.

What if I set a password before posting, then I check my post, enter the password and solve the captcha in the bottom form, but when I click "delete" the following message appears: "0 threads and 0 posts were successfully deleted". My post is still not deleted. Why is that?

 >>/18729/
User post deletion can be disabled by the board owner.

If you issue enough wide range bans you'll get to it in time.
We're gonna take a look at it, just might can do.

 >>/19803/
Is possible to add a batch(similar to 65536 times of 255.255 | 255.254 ... etc.) range bans by solve just one captcha?

"There's only one thing this place needs, less posters."

-nigger mods

 >>/19809/
From: https://support.torproject.org/faq/staying-anonymous/
> Ultimately the best protection is a social approach: the more Tor users there are near you and the more diverse their interests, the less dangerous it will be that you are one of them. Convince other people to use Tor, too!

I will like to say:
"There's only one thing this place needs, more Tor posters."

 >>/19269/
>  But I suggest to save all the content worth saving, in case have to repost it later.

I didn't even think of that, come to think of it I heard of one moderator who did that to his boards from another server. Thanks for the advice!

Problem should be resolved now. Try the new account.

 >>/27102/
I don't need this shit. It's not ok to change these things without askin other ppls' opinion, imo

 >>/26405/
They all plugged in some captcha solver service, they can have human resolvers. Some of the captchas can be pre-resolved too but they are time sensitive. The good thing about them that it costs money for the attacker.

 >>/25496/
>  But I suggest to save all the content worth saving, in case have to repost it later.
I didn't even think of that, come to think of it I heard of one moderator who did that to his boards from another server. Thanks for the advice!

b

946 png
(212.31 KB, 529x296)

Hey, Admins. You should probably switch to hCaptcha.
Stop the shit spammer once and for all because they're images.
I doubt a bot could solve it. They're not AIs.

 >>/24538/
Already tried

 >>/24538/
> They're not AIs.

Wrong

 >>/24538/
They all plugged in some captcha solver service, they can have human resolvers. Some of the captchas can be pre-resolved too but they are time sensitive. The good thing about them that it costs money for the attacker.

How about hiding them with custom css?

 >>/18265/
Is this possible? If so what do I put in my custom .css to do so?

 >>/18271/
I will take a look.

 >>/18271/
You can select these particular elements you want to hide with the :nth-child(x) selector, where the x is the number of the element.
The elements of the form is in the table and the "Password" and "Drawing" fields are in the 5th and 6th table rows, or in the 4th and 5th if you force anonymity via your board's settings (ie. no "Name" field).
Then you can use display: none; css rule to hide elements (there are other options, if you prefer something else you can use that ofc);
Since no other table rows on the page you could use the following:

tr:nth-child(4), tr:nth-child(5) {
  display: none;
}

Or:

tr:nth-child(5), tr:nth-child(6) {
  display: none;
}

Depending on the Name field, as I wrote above. This is important, you don't want to hide captcha accidentally or something.

 >>/26983/
> If Tor reporting is blocked on /pol/ it ends up here.
/pol/ doesn't block Tor reporting. Of course we bring up the fact that the Tor project has many jews on their team whenever there's a /pol/ Tor shitpost. However, Tor is not restricted by me with any settings. Such settings don't even exist. The punishment since I can't ban Tor is to delete their shitposts. Genuine intelligent posting by Tor users is left alone. I have never tried reporting on Tor because I refuse to use it. As for your other points, I'm not suggesting otherwise. The point being, I as the BO of /pol/ have no control over how the site as a whole works. If you're having issues with Tor reporting, start a Twitter account and bring it up to Odilitime. The Meta thread on /pol/ is a sticky. You may post from Tor there and reference the offending thread as an alternative to reporting.

 >>/10257/ 
> click reload

I did, 20 times, and it kept saying "wrong answer or expired captcha". that's the issue

> wtf

if you can complete no cookie captcha with javascript disabled in the same tab then post some screenshots and a tutorial

 >>/10253/
< works for me
learn to type faggot

 >>/10264/ 
kill yourself illiteratespergy

 >>/11682/
captcha

 >>/11327/
You can select these particular elements you want to hide with the :nth-child(x) selector, where the x is the number of the element.
The elements of the form is in the table and the "Password" and "Drawing" fields are in the 5th and 6th table rows, or in the 4th and 5th if you force anonymity via your board's settings (ie. no "Name" field).
Then you can use display: none; css rule to hide elements (there are other options, if you prefer something else you can use that ofc);
Since no other table rows on the page you could use the following:

tr:nth-child(4), tr:nth-child(5) {
  display: none;
}

Or:

tr:nth-child(5), tr:nth-child(6) {
  display: none;
}

Depending on the Name field, as I wrote above. This is important, you don't want to hide captcha accidentally or something.

This thread?

https://web.archive.org/web/20170603035754/http://endchan.xyz/tech/res/597.html

The board was slid by a spammer. Endchan doesn't keep backups.

Damn, you saved my ass, didn't even check if it was already archived. I'm an idiot. Thanks dude.

woah

valid?

 >>/9177/
dude woah, wut?

Btw /agatha2/index.rss is broken. There is an XML parsing error due to & in the title. It should be replaced with &amp . Other boards like /news/ have the same problem, while those not having & have a functioning index.rss, like /operate/index.rss or /polru/index.rss .
You can check if an RSS feed is valid with an RSS feed validator like https://validator.w3.org/feed .

 >>/18804/
made a fix for this.

 >>/18851/
Thank you. Seems good now.

Lady of... png
(1.42 MB, 1000x1333)

Speaking of feature requests: we're still waiting on the Odilitime jock strap crotch-cam live stream RSS feed.

 >>/18900/

kys

I'm not aware that the contents of the subject field can be edited. 8kun uses a different board engine, what feature one imageboard supports other chans might not.
I think a good rule to follow (with the editable part of the posts too) is to think first, then post.

 >>/11557/
See? Forgot the role signature. Here it is for validation.

 >>/11557/
sounds like mistakes in subject field are irrevocable, then.
kind of a problem for this board, because it's a bu when msm crashes 8kun, so when it's active, it's very fast and different people with dif experience levels are making threads - mistakes inevitably happen.

Would you consider making the subject field editable (i guess the question is, Why not? If the programming isn't onerous, it would be a real plus.)

 >>/11560/
thanks for reply btw
appreciate it.

 >>/11560/
There are a couple of projects going on in parallel - besides the busyness of the daily life - I really doubt we will implement subject editing in the foreseeable future, but it is an intriguing suggestion, so I'm gonna nag the development team, maybe they'll say "easy peasy lemon squeezy, here it is. E.".