a random pol banner

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Political discussion of ideology, history, and [current] events.

New Reply on thread #85077
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]

thumbnail of 2neeb6.jpg
thumbnail of 2neeb6.jpg
2neeb6 jpg
(94.67 KB, 1024x846)
Hey so I got a few questions just to clear up a couple things that some people say about national socialism as well as my general thoughts on things in general.

So I guess I start from the beginning the way I view a nation as it should be is as a garden where the government acts to grow a strong and powerful people. In that garden anything can grow which represents the myriad of talents with the strongest being allowed to propagate themselves and the weaker allowed to attempt but inevitably fail. In the propagation of the strongest both the people and nation benefit however there must be a recognition of the weak and the strong and that there are different weaknesses and strengths. I have talked to some people who say that if they were to ever get power they would institute universal basic income which I think just incentivizes laziness. 

I guess what I'm trying to clear up do the people here believe in a hierarchy or do they believe everyone is equal?
thumbnail of they-wont-be-laughing-for-much-longer.webm
thumbnail of they-wont-be-laughing-for-much-longer.webm
they-wont-be-laughing... webm
(37.54 MB, 640x360 vp8)
I believe it's best to answer with quotes from Hitler.
"The National Socialist trade-union is not an instrument for class warfare, but a representative organ of the various professions and callings. The National Socialist State recognizes no ‘classes’ but, from the political point of view, only citizens with absolutely equal rights and equal obligations corresponding thereto. Apart from these, it recognizes subjects of the State who have no political rights whatsoever. According to the National Socialist concept, it is not the task of the trade-union to band together certain men within the national community and thus gradually to transform these men into a class, so as to use them in a conflict against other similarly organised groups within the national community. We certainly cannot assign this task to the trade-union as such. This was the task assigned to it the moment it became a fighting weapon in the hands of the Marxist. The trade-union is not naturally an instrument of class warfare; but the Marxists transformed it into an instrument for use in their own class struggle. They created the economic weapon which the international jew uses for the purpose of destroying the economic foundations of free and independent national States, of ruining their national trade and industry and thereby enslaving free nations to serve Jewish world finance, which transcends all state boundaries." - Mein Kampf page 676

"For the National Socialist trade-union, therefore, the strike is a means that may, and indeed must be, resorted to as long as there is not yet a National Socialist völkisch State, but when that State is established it will, as a matter of course, abolish the class struggle between the two great groups made up of employers and employees respectively. For that is a struggle which has always resulted in lessening national production and injuring the national community. In place of this struggle, the National Socialist State will undertake the task of caring for and defending the rights of all parties concerned. It will be the duty of the economic chambers to keep the national economic system in smooth working order and to remove whatever defects or
errors may affect it adversely. Questions which are to-day settled only by the struggle of millions of people will then be settled in the representative chambers of trades and professions and in the central economic parliament. Thus employers and employees will no longer find themselves drawn into a mutual conflict over wages and hours of work, always to the detriment of the interests of both. They will solve these problems together before a higher authority, whose sole aim will be to safeguard the welfare of the national community and of the State. Here, as everywhere else, the inflexible principle must hold good that the interests of the country must come before party interests." - pages 677 and 678

Sounds nice, but I meant more in the personal and societal aspect those who have ambition and talent go on to become higher men trying to embody ever higher ideals. Noblesse oblige if you like.
thumbnail of We must raise a New Man.mp4
thumbnail of We must raise a New Man.mp4
We must raise a New... mp4
(7.14 MB, 640x360 h264)
thumbnail of 23156.jpg
thumbnail of 23156.jpg
23156 jpg
(48.46 KB, 960x535)
thumbnail of 134a.jpg
thumbnail of 134a.jpg
134a jpg
(653.83 KB, 1500x1004)
thumbnail of 57425.jpg
thumbnail of 57425.jpg
57425 jpg
(333.5 KB, 1500x1005)
thumbnail of Girls-of-BDM-Bund-Deutscher-Madel-League-of-German-Girls.jpg
thumbnail of Girls-of-BDM-Bund-Deutscher-Madel-League-of-German-Girls.jpg
Girls-of-BDM-Bund-Deu... jpg
(164.65 KB, 839x462)
There were no higher ideals than being a citizen of the Third Reich, then and now. On the societal aspect, there were the boys and girls of the Hitler Youth. In the SS, enlisted had different squad ranks while officers had different lead ranks. There wasn't a hierarchy of citizens besides mentioned in the quotes with employers / employees. To become greater and achieve higher was meant for all true German citizens and not jewish parasites. The latter whom both disparaged and degenerated culture before and after the Third Reich.

freedom is duty, I guess what I am trying to say that there are always lesser and greater men, I assume you're talking about equality in terms of the law.
In terms of their law, not modern law. The modern concept has been made perverse. All of the current crying about has done nothing to eliminate extreme class differences, because "equal rights" now means less rights for the other person. Those jews deem as "oppressors" and the brainwashed sheep who mentally absorb their drivel. Men and peach color skin are the primary targets of the jewish agenda to break up or discourage the family unit of these types.
Americans either don't know or want to know that the US is collapsing or think that nothing can be done to save the USA. Any plans or ideas to slow or escape the decay are quickly shot down as unworkable.

Instead of demanding that minimum wages be repealed or checkpoints be ended, Americans would rather beg for their chains by asking for more laws.

thumbnail of 1645426470315.webm
thumbnail of 1645426470315.webm
1645426470315 webm
(3.88 MB, 400x225 vp8)
>  I meant more in the personal and societal aspect those who have ambition and talent go on to become higher men trying to embody ever higher ideals

If you mean as hiearchy climbing such thing was faded in NS germany since you are citizen of nation or better an individual with relationship and responsibilities for your nation and class conflicts also faded. But if you mean it as sort of carrier struggle of promotions or profesion (and here i can be wrong) it was motivated as long as you did not break your responsibilities to your community (like having a family) since your struggle is a struggle of nation to exist
The very same Americans who scream that regulations make countries rich are surprised to hear that the Soviet Union was poor.
thumbnail of 1651877775198.webm
thumbnail of 1651877775198.webm
1651877775198 webm
(5.51 MB, 852x480 vp8)
thumbnail of 1650548540215.webm
thumbnail of 1650548540215.webm
1650548540215 webm
(869.13 KB, 540x540 vp8)
> Reeee laizeres free economics is way corporates know what to do
Meanwhile margaret thatcher fucked up britain irreversibly with regan the US...
We already live in world where corporate jew has free hand you see it everywhere the exploitation had become a third name
Laizres free economics is meme you are a meme and it will stay that way

> Implying that soviet union had regulated economy
Ty si teda iny kokot judeobolsheviks had only one thing in econojy goal THE PRODUCTION AT ANY COST 
Had you heared on 5 year plan? No? The famous quota of we will give a crazy high quota on how many of stuff should be made or how many harvest should be made and unfurfiling is counted as death sentence so go figure and we will rise it after period of time anyway?
The same quota plan for which you produced all of the goods but still got empty shelf and table in your home?
No? Then fuck off aidskike
The doublespeak by Amazon. Jesus Christ. "While employees have the right to organize, we have a right and responsibility to share our position that a direct working relationship is better for the customer, the company and the associate." It's not sharing their position. It's enforcing. Proposing snitching to management about phrases like 'living wage', 'grievance', 'contract' and 'representation'. It all brings me back to when I used to work under such shit jew retail orgs. Of course they reject Unions. Amazon is infamous for telling their employees they can't even go urinate.
If you said that the government was wiretapping your phone in 1999, everybody would have called you a nutjob.

Now if you say that the government is wiretapping your phone, no one cares.

How can Americans sleep at night now or look in a mirror without feeling disgusted and ashamed?
That's all AIDSkike ever focuses on, while sometimes citing China or Russia or claiming the gas chambers lie as truth or claiming the Gestapo are modern police. He's an annoying jew. Nothing more. So don't call him your bro.
Is he not right though? You can't argue against facts, so you focus on the persona, and tell others "pretend it's not there".
thumbnail of why AIDSkike is AIDSkike.png
thumbnail of why AIDSkike is AIDSkike.png
why AIDSkike... png
(8.65 MB, 3277x4424)
Ok, "totally not the same person as AIDSkike defending AIDSkike". Again. Why don't you tell the class how you yourself feel about the Gestapo, National Socialists and Hitler? You know, if he's "right", because these are some of his past messages. Stop dancing around the topic and get it over with. Reach down. Grab a pair. Say it.
>  You can't argue against facts
riddle me with this laddy 
how could gestapo manage to be a secret police doing at the same time all tasks of standart police forces SD and abwehr with budget that was nothing compared to mentioned higher 
riddle me with this how could Hitler invent "concentration camps" when rotschild and co had them in 1905?
and most importantly 
how its possible to achieve around 2 milion kills of certain ethnicity more than was a whole europe if i am generous to count nations outside of axis camp
why is NS superior in economy? and why does Marxism fail to address the rights of the workers where it supposed to actually support them? I know NS worked really well especially on addressing the welfare of the workers and businessmen, that's why there was an economic miracle
thumbnail of Reich workers.jpg
thumbnail of Reich workers.jpg
Reich workers jpg
(174.76 KB, 902x891)
Because they cast off interest and became unchained from the world's banks with their own money. Money backed not by gold nor silver, but by the efforts of labor. It was a time when workers where appreciated for holding up the nation's economy. Finding respect for workers these days is like finding a fucking unicorn.

Post(s) action:

Moderation Help

23 replies | 18 file
New Reply on thread #85077
Max 20 files0 B total