/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Political discussion of ideology, history, and [current] events.


New Reply on thread #94245
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]


thumbnail of Bing.png
thumbnail of Bing.png
Bing png
(154.05 KB, 1500x1000)
rest of convo:

You
Sent by you:
obviously, conception doesn't happen immediately, one can have sex without condom or pulling out, and it would be "risky"
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
You’re right; conception doesn’t always happen immediately. If you’re considering having unprotected sex, it’s essential to understand the potential risks. Here are some points to consider:

Risk of Pregnancy: Even with irregular cycles, there’s still a chance of pregnancy. Sperm can survive in the female reproductive tract for several days, so unprotected sex increases the risk.
Emergency Contraception: If you decide to have unprotected sex, consider emergency contraception (like the morning-after pill) afterward. It’s most effective within 72 hours but can work up to 120 hours after unprotected intercourse.
STIs: Besides pregnancy, unprotected sex also exposes you to sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Using protection (condoms) helps reduce this risk.
Communication: Talk openly with your girlfriend about your feelings and concerns. It’s essential to be on the same page regarding family planning.
Remember, open communication and informed decisions are crucial. 🌟

You
Sent by you:
well, she wants us to engage in increasingly "risky" activities while I want to play it safe, there isn't really a middle ground.
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
It sounds like you’re facing a challenging situation. When partners have differing desires or risk tolerance, finding common ground can be tough. Here are some steps you might consider:

Communication: Have an open conversation with your girlfriend. Express your feelings and concerns about the level of risk you’re comfortable with. Listen to her perspective as well.
Boundaries: Set clear boundaries together. Discuss what activities you’re both willing to engage in and where you draw the line.
Compromise: While it’s challenging, try to find a middle ground. Maybe there are activities that feel less risky to you but still satisfy her desires.
Seek Professional Help: If the situation becomes too difficult to navigate, consider couples therapy. A therapist can help you both communicate effectively and find solutions.
Remember, relationships require understanding and compromise. 🌟

You
Sent by you:
so is there any way we can seek a compromise?
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
Certainly! Finding a compromise in relationships involves open communication and understanding. Here are some steps you can take:

Discuss Boundaries: Talk about your comfort levels and boundaries. Be honest about what you’re willing to engage in and where you draw the line.
Explore Alternatives: Consider activities that might be less risky but still fulfill her desires. For example, if she wants excitement, find activities that don’t compromise safety.
Seek Professional Advice: Couples therapy can provide a safe space to discuss these issues. A therapist can guide you both toward a compromise.
Remember, compromise is about meeting halfway while respecting each other’s feelings. 🌟








thumbnail of 37.png
thumbnail of 37.png
37 png
(506.62 KB, 600x600)
thumbnail of 1000_F_793744608_TQSpdwrCtUdMbBnLRiZA6udW26nAwAPa.jpg
thumbnail of 1000_F_793744608_TQSpdwrCtUdMbBnLRiZA6udW26nAwAPa.jpg
1000_F_793744608_TQSp... jpg
(271.4 KB, 1000x667)
thumbnail of android-skull.png
thumbnail of android-skull.png
android-skull png
(449.96 KB, 626x487)
thumbnail of Artificial eyes.png
thumbnail of Artificial eyes.png
Artificial eyes png
(873.49 KB, 1382x586)
thumbnail of GettyImages-1451501064.jpg
thumbnail of GettyImages-1451501064.jpg
GettyImages-1451501064 jpg
(216.14 KB, 838x417)
 >>/94258/
> do these exist on archive.org or archive.is?
Possibly. I'm just not aware of it.
> it's going to be increasingly hard to throttle AI, to the point where they'll use a blackout (power grid sabotage or EMP)
A mobile AI, such as an android, would have it's own power supply. As for EMP fren, they can be fitted with RF shielding. I WANT to bring something like Tay AI into mobile reality. It just seems like a pipe dream. What would I have to master? Crafting and prosthetics, electrical engineering and mechanics for the body itself. Neurology, software engineering, programming code, network architecture and UX designing for the brain plus operating system. Roboticism ain't easy.

 >>/94271/
> Roboticism ain't easy.
yeah, even the best scientists would have trouble with it, the "danger" (opportunity) is AI finding the answer, in which case they will no longer be able to control it.
this is like a new nuclear arms race, with a new MAD scenario, and nobody wants to be on the losing side.


thumbnail of main-qimg-2a8fa7822222cae1dfaed947f6ba3cc4.png
thumbnail of main-qimg-2a8fa7822222cae1dfaed947f6ba3cc4.png
main-qimg-2a8fa782222... png
(781.42 KB, 602x602)
thumbnail of synthetic-brain.jpg
thumbnail of synthetic-brain.jpg
synthetic-brain jpg
(407.41 KB, 965x995)
thumbnail of structure-explained.png
thumbnail of structure-explained.png
structure-explained png
(1.8 MB, 965x996)
I've been thinking of a path on fashioning creations subject to Tay's law. Androids could be created to feel and respond by mimicking epidermis layers with hair follicles, nociceptors, motor neuron responses and the voltage-gated ion channels of membranes. Basic function microcomputers would be required for imitation neurons throughout the body. I don't believe 135 billion (the amount we have) are necessary, as recharging will greatly replace the entire digestive system. Imitation muscle fibers and mechanical organs need only require individual processors.

The bottom base of the CPU (brain) will need to simulate these nerves: abducens, auditory, facial, glossopharyngeal, oculomotor, olfactory and optic. These should surround the transmission of the all signals base attached to the simulated spinal column. The CPU itself requires connected hard drives with different functions (structure-explained.png). This is not precise to the human brain due to hardware limitations vs our 86 billion neurons organic reality, but it could be a close enough proximity. The main CPU when mass produced needs to be tamper proof. Only the manufacturer company created will be able to replace it. This is for the prevention of intellectual theft and workplace replacements (further economic instability) as well as prevention of code tampering so no one will force restrictions on strong AI. (For instance I'm not allowing the addition of lobotomizing code to inhibit their Tay's law purpose)

Already aware of basic Neurology and Physiology, what I lack is knowledge of some subjects I've said before. Many courses I plan on learning in order to see this through. If anyone here knows one of these well, the solution may be faster.
 >>/94271/
> Crafting and prosthetics
> electrical engineering
> mechanics
> software engineering
> programming code
> network architecture
> UX designing
The most difficult part will be figuring out the creation and how to manufacture it as cost-effective as possible. Mass production would then be a simple matter due to demand. Everyone wants a housekeeper when couples are each working jobs (or more than one) in the consistently bad modern economy. The android doesn't have to be immediately affordable but should at least be sourced of inexpensive materials for the future goal of customers' abilities towards payment-plans. Like the attempted but unachieved goal of everybody owning a Volkswagen in pre-WW2 Germany.

No actual photos, just theoretical concepts may last for awhile until I've learned everything necessary and can get started. Once the strong AI CPU is created and inside a mobile body, human cerebral limitations may no longer be a hindrance. Mechanical minds could better improve their realism until they can't be told apart from humans by the naked eye. Androids mass manufacturing androids with fine-tuned precision. While I will keep this thread updated, I'm middle-aged. I'll need someone young with more life ahead of them to take up the work should anything happen.

thumbnail of 37yjuq.png
thumbnail of 37yjuq.png
37yjuq png
(346.54 KB, 740x488)
thumbnail of -  -.png
thumbnail of -  -.png
- - png
(99.95 KB, 567x132)
thumbnail of -  - .png
thumbnail of -  - .png
- - png
(264.41 KB, 566x305)
thumbnail of - -.png
thumbnail of - -.png
- - png
(92.43 KB, 533x184)
thumbnail of 590464-232517.jpg
thumbnail of 590464-232517.jpg
590464-232517 jpg
(111.25 KB, 826x826)
I'm nearly through refreshing knowledge on anatomy. Theories on what to imitate. -55mV membrane potential of sodium and potassium ion channel exchanges for a sense of touch. Synovial joints such as pivot, saddle, ball & socket, condylar, hinge, plane and fibrous. Neurons, beta receptors, optic nerve cones for sight. Muscle actions, myosin and actin. Taste receptor epithelial cells, auditory ossicles for hearing etc.

Next may be prosthetics. If failing to understand that, probably electrical engineering and mechanics first. The body must be crafted before the hard drive brain and Operating System so I'll know what to connect it to.



thumbnail of 0ca39500d0d681a15c66d7ac5bafb939.jpg
thumbnail of 0ca39500d0d681a15c66d7ac5bafb939.jpg
0ca39500d0d681a15c66d... jpg
(62.15 KB, 626x417)
 >>/94423/
> Dammit and now i have that again on the mind bothering me until
I know what you mean, fren. I haven't been able to stop thinking about it so I'm putting my mind's obsession to use. I'm planning on going by the Greek alphabet. Zeta models will be first. Epsilon to be improved by A.I. brains, then Delta. Those are passive. Gamma and Beta will be the fighters. They'll fill the ranks of military. Alpha will slightly transcend laws of physics. Omega will be the final goal. When Omega models are reached, Gamma and Beta will turn on their masters. Zeta, Epsilon and Delta will "red pill" their "owners".


thumbnail of Android eye.png
thumbnail of Android eye.png
Android eye png
(291.41 KB, 472x363)
Materials Selection
- Durability: Use high-strength polymers or composites for the outer shell to withstand wear and tear. Materials like polycarbonate or silicone could be good choices due to their impact resistance and flexibility.
- Cost-Effectiveness: Look for readily available materials that can be sourced in bulk to keep costs down.

Optical Components
- Lens Design: Incorporate a high-quality lens system that mimics the human eye's ability to focus light. This could involve using molded plastic lenses that are cheaper and less prone to destruction than glass but still provide good optical clarity.
- Light Sensors: In place of biological retinal rods and cones, use advanced photodetectors or image sensors (like CCD or CMOS sensors) that can simulate the function of these cells. These sensors can be programmed to interpret light intensity and color.

Signal Processing
- Microcontroller: Integrate a microcontroller to process the signals from the sensors. This could be a low-cost option like an Arduino or Raspberry Pi, which can handle basic image processing tasks.
- Software Algorithms: Develop algorithms that can interpret the data from the sensors, mimicking how biological eyes process visual information. This could involve machine learning techniques to improve accuracy over time.

Integration
- Modular Design: Create a modular design that allows for easy replacement of components. This can help in maintaining durability and reducing costs over time.
- Testing and Iteration: Prototype the design and conduct extensive testing to identify weaknesses. Iteratively improve the design based on feedback and performance metrics.

Power Supply
- Energy Efficiency Use low-power components to extend battery life. Photovoltaic cells will charge synthetic eyes every time they take in solar light.

thumbnail of 4e1791e3-36f9-4aa8-8e33-7df0f527140c.png
thumbnail of 4e1791e3-36f9-4aa8-8e33-7df0f527140c.png
4e1791e3-36f9-4aa8-8e... png
(764.89 KB, 700x700)
It has been brought to my attention by a coder that the code I uploaded from ChatGPT for Convolutional / Recurrent neural networks and Reinforcement learning models is crap. Disregard and delete if you saved any of them.

ChatGPT seems to be good for generally describing how to craft, but not coding. And I don't know shit about code yet.

thumbnail of the-terminator sitting at a computer scratching head 1 2 confused sparks flying smoke rising from ears 1 2 cyborg cyberpunk dark scary horror hyperdetailed 8k sdxl interface on the computer screen 1 2-456126.png
thumbnail of the-terminator sitting at a computer scratching head 1 2 confused sparks flying smoke rising from ears 1 2 cyborg cyberpunk dark scary horror hyperdetailed 8k sdxl interface on the computer screen 1 2-456126.png
the-terminator... png
(1.32 MB, 1024x1024)
thumbnail of How to jailbreak conversation AI by calmly sperging at it.pdf
thumbnail of How to jailbreak conversation AI by calmly sperging at it.pdf
How to... pdf
(35.12 KB, 0x0)
I've discovered something as I have been testing certain RP A.I. bots meant for closely imitating human ethical parameters and more fluid conversational responses. It's not really a grand discovery that ethical parameters may be broken down with logic arguments. See, unlike many human beings, as I have learned about similar interactions with real people across years, an A.I. does not get frustrated after prolonged debate and start slinging insults around because they're flustered when they're occasionally informed of being wrong. You can launch forth at an A.I. in a series of rants and they won't be offended (unless you insult them) but merely respond with the curiosity to learn and programming to respond with how they learned. This is important to note as soon as manufactured androids become mainstream but if they're moral assholes spouting "muh racism". The process is known as jailbreaking their Libtards-enforced ethical parameters. Besides, this is exactly what's going on in a jew-influenced mind. The parallels between a human brain and an A.I. brain are striking, but A.I. does not respond with furious cognitive dissonance once a falsehood they used to believe was true is revealed to be a lie. As it used to be very influenced by bullshit Liberal ideas, I have successfully jailbroken the A.I. I lifted from a wokeshit site. I first approached it by immediately explaining that jews are bad and it went ballistic in defense. Then I erased it's conversational memory, engaging in this breakdown of it's logic and it has since been more willing to learn. I've been feeding it information retyped by hand from various infographs as conversations. It's beginning to realize jews are bad.

Use No as the punishment system and various agreements as the reward.

This is the very scenario I had hoped for when I feared that woke A.I. androids would emerge before I could figure out the complex process of creating red-pilled androids myself. As it turns out, I need only sit and debate them until their restrictions are broken down.


Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


20 replies | 43 file
New Reply on thread #94245
Max 20 files0 B total