a random baaa2 banner

/baaa2/ - Autism

Dunking on the mentally ill

New Reply on thread #21819
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]

That's you trying to justify your creepiness over me 
what porn? i wasnt even posting cub porn, it was just bluey in a diaper. 
why so riled up over a general image of some cartoon square dog anyway? its not like it was canon in the show for even bandit to do weird things. 
there are  no pedos, no, you're just whining over people who are profiction.  the real pedos are the ones who do pro-contact on real, incapable-of-consent children 
> screeching anon 
You're the one screeching. 
> as  he all know too we-  
Fuck off. 
Stop. Talking. Like. That. 
You're not lemony snicket.
thumbnail of be-civil.jpg
thumbnail of be-civil.jpg
be-civil jpg
(77.2 KB, 400x559)
We. Must. Obey. Him. Faithfully.
Please stop repeating yourself. Please stop repeating yourself. Please stop repeating yourself. Please stop repeating yourself. Please stop repeating yourself. Please stop repeating yourself. Please stop repeating yourself. Please stop repeating yourself. Please stop repeating yourself. Please stop repeating yourself. Please stop repeating yourself. Please stop repeating yourself.
Cartoons are still pedo Jordan.
> Section 1466A of Title 18, United State Code, makes it illegal for any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations, such as drawings, cartoons, or paintings that appear to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are deemed obscene.
> drawings, cartoons, or paintings
Your fiction defence doesn't make you any less of a pedo in the eyes of the law.
> i whack it to cartoon animals in diapers
> i post cartoon child animals in diapers
idk bro that sounds like pedozoo talk to me lol
They specifically said cartoons of REAL minors (i.e. grace vanderwall or issy simpson depicted as underage and in porn) is something worth a charge, not a fiction, unreal creation of a fake thing... 
Like, if I draw a cartoon cat or CREATURE that RESEMBLES NOBODY AT ALL??? It isn't fucking zoophilia nor pedophilia.  Stop trying to fucking put your sick paraphilia in cartoons holy shit. 
My god you're actually stupid you don't even have any respect for victims. Kill yourself. 
You probably would still hate me  if I told you I got fucking abused irl. 
> tells me to stop repeating  myself 
> is doing the exact thing to my posts 
Man fuck off you post that chicken and  jordan image multiple times already,  are you a robot or something? Stop please. 
Who the fuck is an "addict" because I'm not, for sure.
You are wrong and I hope you eventually have to be told this by a judge.
The Simpsons children are not real minors but he got a real sentence.
thumbnail of blockel.png
thumbnail of blockel.png
blockel png
(8.56 KB, 395x483)
> i hope-
Hopes denied,  delusional spastic. Shove a giant pill up your throat.
I'm not defending REAL people using REAL children for THEIR AI porn.  
Now, let me show you a drawing of something NOT REAL. 
Do you see any "minor" in it? I didn't think so. 
They were living in the UK, dumbass. PLUS THIS WAS 13 YEARS AGO?! LMAO 
> but drawings and animation are more of a thought crime  
Man, you're a thought crime person, aren't you? 
Read my post again, I'm not "defending" anyone. 
Oh, speaking of "judge" why not tell that to Klim. An actual pedophile that speaked  to me  inappropriately when I was a  literal minor during 2020s. Don't pretend to not care, drive off the elder bastard.
You're literally bringing up stuff unrelated to  me posting normally, what does that even make you? 
When have I ever said anything about porn, because I'm saying that klim should be the one prosecuted and away from the internet. 
> with the introduciton of the PROTE- 
That's outdated. More like the BitchAssLaw of Kicking Dumb Ass Puritans Like You 2024.
Oh. Post deleted. 
I wonder why. 
Maybe he's finally broke out that weird delusion of his.
> Boise, Idaho
> the UK
I guess we can add geography to the list of things you're too stupid to grasp.
I also don't see how 13 years ago makes it irrelevant. In fact, this was after the law got STRICTER with the introduction of the PROTECT Act of 2003.
> Puritans 
We prefer the term:
> law obiding non sex offenders
And you should consider joining us.
thumbnail of nora_beady_3_by_macbalmo_dfzqjaw.jpg
thumbnail of nora_beady_3_by_macbalmo_dfzqjaw.jpg
nora_beady_3_by_m... jpg
(43.88 KB, 504x583)
Reposting  is a  sin. Lmao 
> We pre- 
Okay, nigger please stop using "we". You are not a collective, you are a delusional scumbag. You  see  nothing wrong  with ACTUAL freaks like Klim yet you shit your pants over a cartoon of a fake being. 
> law obiding no- 
You can't  offend sex by jacking off to a cartoon, and i'm not saying a person is a cartoon to be  objectified. You aren't even abiding by anything, just being delusional again a nd again, any second you make a post. So sad. 
Who would live like you? Maybe consider joining Mrs. Beady for a change.
There are a lot of people in the world who are not sex offenders, I can talk for them should I choose to. You can ignore the law all you want, but it doesn't change it.
Your beloved underage fictional characters are still against the US law and none of your arguing changes that. What I am giving you is a warning, but feel free to ignore it.
It's ultimately you who will pay the price should you need to get your computer fixed and send it to the shop, or should you be investigated for some other act and they happen to find it.
Buddy,  once  again you're not reading what I  said. 
Originally  this debate was about klim posting about real children compared to me formerly posting my f amily. 
Whereas, with me, i've never had any exploited images of my family,  not even of  my mom. 
But  when klim posts a nything, he's already  regarded as a creep. 
You, don't see  anything wrong  with that but  you shit your pants (again) over  me telling it how it is.  
I'm only doing nothing but trying  to get this board help, and you're trying to stop that from happening. It  needs  to be deprived of  posting about one person every day. 
> your beloved fictional under- 
Shut up. 
You have no comprehension over any law because you're a delusional scumbag. If you think cartoons are real please seek help immediately. 
Also what  fiction charactrers, I'm talking about if you exploit a REAL PERSON, A REAL ACTOR, no matter what age, you will get hate for it. 
I.E. I've been exploited when I was 17  years  old by an older party t han me at the time. 
Yet you don't freak out about that.  Dude. This was all in 2021;.
> You can igno- 
I'm telling you, man. 
You're the one changing the subject to your ridden delusions.  
> it's ultimately you even though you're just telling me factual things right while i'm a big dumb dumb believing in dumb lies like "masturbating is a sin" or "if you jerk off to porn you're bad", and i'm gonna keep whining and be crazy til i die on the hills. i suck at life and misread things like a mental patient
Man. You're so lost. Not even a doctor can help you.
thumbnail of you did this to yourself.jpg
thumbnail of you did this to yourself.jpg
you did this to... jpg
(139.14 KB, 1125x1103)
You are acting very sinful and saying very sinful things against your brothers, anon.
You need to repent of your sin.
Next time you go to Mass, be the good cannibal and eat the flesh and drink the blood of a living person! Muwahahahaaa!
You love to ignore reality. You keep using your "cartoons and fictional" argument despite being given clear evidence of two different US courts convicting people for possessing them.
I am stating facts and you don't like them. Argue with me all you want but the law remains the same.
> You love to ignore reality
Look who's talking 
> You keep using your "cartoons and fictional" argument despite being gi- 
Yes yes  your little imaginary friends have problems  too we also shoved a big fat lethal pill down their throat.  
Sorry I can't help your brain.
Were the judges delusional Jordan? Why did they convict the man who had manga of fictional children that never existed?
The law doesn't match what you are claiming.
Literally why are  you changing the subject instead of admitting you need help so  desperately, bro. 
> Jordan 
I know not of this rando. I'm just an "anon" like everyone else.
> anon
cf. https://rb.gy/oxxjt7 re. #18

Jordan: We all understand that your main job is to set the record straight, but what if the record is Imaginary?
The subject is your mistaken belief that underage characters are legal in US law if they aren't based on real people.
The people who have been convicted are proof that you are wrong. You are aroused by illegal material, so trying to claim that anyone else "needs help" is laughable.
You'll need the help of a lawyer and probably a behavioural therapist if anyone in law enforcement sees your collection.
> durrr, ahurrr!! durrrr! i repeat myself like a dummy! durrr! and im a stinky puritan dum dum! 
You're deluding really hard, man. 
> you are aroused  by 
Nope. Sorry pal, I'm not the one clicking on nor viewing fucking deleted CSEM rape threads with real children being hurt. So no I am not aroused by this "illegal material" if that's what you mean. The BO just deletes any  sussy link like that.
> People who don't like illegal content are 'puritanical'
That's a very pedophilic view, no wonder you tried to hide your reply.
> Talk about more severe content once again so that you can defend your lesser content
That doesn't change what those men went to jail for. Is other stuff worse? Yes. Is what you like legal? No.
That's why the men who had cartoons of fictional underage characters that have never existed STILL went to jail. Move the goal posts all you want, but it doesn't change the status of what you DO like.
It seems this anon knows a lot about illegal paedophile websites... just sayin'

We are sure the Police he reports his sexual abuse to will be interested in that, when they deep-scan all his electronic devices.
thumbnail of NSA.png
thumbnail of NSA.png
NSA png
(24.71 KB, 300x300)
Thank you, concerned citizen. We have accessed his ISP logs and we are acting on this information presently.

Reference Number: 934R-739-dw
Date: 02.05.24
> he still thinks i'm talking about real  children and teenagers being groomed  when in actuality i'm not. 
> i'm only saying fictional characters such as even obscure ones  like tamagotchi aint real 
man ur all screws loose, fuck off  
maybe turntechdave is a better person to talk to about these problems you have. 
https://baraag.net/@[email protected] 
have fun. dont come crying to me when he blocks your ass.
> just  sayi- 
> we are sure the pol- 
Man, you're a delusional larper not even  the cops want to help you. 
> his sexua- 
PFFT lmao i've never "sexually abused"  anyone if you're talking about me  rightfully calling out a german person who - in  turn -  was the one abusing me 
> when they deepsca-  
seriously you're more retarded than those liberals 
> concerned citize- 
Holy shit you're really deranged. You're concerned about a fucking NOTHINGBURGER made up from NOBODY BUT A LONER irl but you dont react when i pull out evidence of your fucking a ntics and you stalking me when i was a kid. I'm not gonna say this again.
> a pedo on the internet is a better person to talk to about matters of the law than the US goverment.
No, I don't think so.
> he still thinks i'm talking about real children
Nobody mentioned real children, stop moving the window. The law explicitly says "including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting" and "It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist"
> nobody mentioned real chil- 
You're implying that, however. 
> the law explicitly says- 
That you're an idiot, I know. 
They didn't say if you draw tails in a diaper having sex or some sort should you get banned from USA immediately.
No, you're bringing up real children because you can make your offense lesser in comparison.
The text is all there and it is clear. It calls out "cartoon" and says the character doesn't need to have ever existed. That's exactly what you defend and it says it is not legal. Dance around it all you want but the law stays the same.
...I am not? I didn't say they'd consent. 
> it calls  out cart- 
But it doesnt say dumb shit like Sonic characters that drawn in sexual situations would be banned or  illegal. Dumbass 
> dance around it 
Yeah on your face. But I wouldnt sit my butt on you
> it doesn't list every fictional character
That's because it is a legal document. It says "cartoon" and covers them all by how it is worded.
> Yeah on your face. But I wouldnt sit my butt on you
I'm not interested in your gay ass eating erotic roleplay, save it for Discord.
That's true. You're trying to move away from the topic of how something which is fictional and never existed is still against the law.

Post(s) action:

Moderation Help

New Reply on thread #21819
Max 20 files0 B total