/g/ - Technolo/g/y

FTE dev was mad
https://rbt.asia/g/thread/80439845/#

< eukara> really getting desperate using a russian proxy, why even bother posting when nobody wants to hear what you have to say?
>  you end up banned. every. single. time.
>  I've never been banned
>  anyway I did what you couldn't or wouldn't
>  4 million ents in DP
>  you're fucked in the head, right?
>  suck on it faggot dick chopping-supporter
>  nope
>  clearly
>  I'm a licensed attorney.
>  what are you?
>  prove it
>  you're making a lot of assumptions about others being inferior to you, when you do not know them and you're clearly an egolomaniac
>  but you could never exercise power over another adult, that's why you target kids
>  you disgusting prick
>  you're just as simple to figure out as any other insane person.
>  and clearly you're not a good attorney, because why else have so much time on your hands modding Nexuiz of all things.
>  like wow, no life confirmed!
>  eukara: I'm not like you: I don't have to work.
>  I just do my hobbies
>  because you don't have work.
>  you're a fake.
>  you have accomplished nothing.
>  4 million entities says otherwise.
>  not a single person knows or cares that you exist.
>  and my marble floors say otherwise :)
>  you don't put your real name out, people won't remember your alts.
>  the purpose to do the thing is the thing itself.
>  so 'doing your hobbies' 'not having to work' is worth bragging about, when it's clear you're not doing any goodwill



 > no one cares about 4 million entities in Darkplaces. Nobody sane would ever need that many visible entities.
>  that's unplayable over the network.
>  but you don't care about that. in your little head you think you've figured it all out.
>  and I'm wrong.
>  funnily enough, you used my code from FTE to make this work. So no, you're a talentless, worthless hack.
>  go away.
>  Be a Narcissist in your own 4 walls.
>  ill be with you in a moment
> ~eukara 46.23.94.114 


< starsomething> ill be with you in a moment
>  Glad your mad I used your algo :)
>  pound that sand boy!
>  it just proves you have no talent.
>  you can even revoke the license to use it and sue me :)

cirno_7 jpeg
(250.65 KB, 1448x2048)

cirno__2 jpg
(78.5 KB, 850x605)

 >>/79492216/
> ( silence is consent)
And that's all we hear from the FSF, SFConservancy, Linus, LKML, etc: because they DO agree (effectivly) with Grsecurity.

As Bradly Spengler identified:
>  https://twitter.com/spendergrsec/status/1293155787859206146
> Importantly, neither the FSF nor the SFC, nor in fact any actual lawyer agrees with this bizarre claim from an anonymous troll. More info about the source of the claim can be found here: https://grsecurity.net/setting_the_record_straight_on_oss_v_perens_part1
>  Thanks for doing your part, "Dr" to continue the troll's harrassment

>  >LOL. " #GRSecurity violates both the Linux kernel's copyright and the #GCC #copyright by forbidding redistribution of the patches (in their Access Agreement): which are non-seperable derivative works...

To point out Grsecurity is violating a clause in the GPL, THE CENTRAL CLAUSE (share and share alike): is to be a mysoginist, woman-hating, girl loving, pedo.

So the FSF, SFConservancy, and LKML don't "go" there.

81x0u83lcUL._RI_ jpg
(423.68 KB, 2560x1920)

57_cab623ab-ba... jpg
(43.43 KB, 380x500)

This is about which FOSS devs are making bank off of FOSS. There are TWO(2):

*Linus Trovalds
*Bradly Spengler.

*Linus Trovalds is paid 1.3 million dollars per year likely under contract to forgoe the excercise a legal right he has: to sue violators of his copyright.

If he violated that agreement, (identified) third-party beneficiaries to that contract could attempt to seek to recovery of whatever liquidated damages are specified in that contract.

*Bradly Spengler simply adds a No-Redistribution clause to his linux-kernel patch. As he notes: the FSF and _SFConservancy_ all support him in this (it's 2020, he started doing it years ago, they have said nothing against him)

>  https://twitter.com/spendergrsec/status/1293155787859206146
> Importantly, neither the FSF nor the SFC, nor in fact any actual lawyer agrees with this bizarre claim from an anonymous troll. More info about the source of the claim can be found here: https://grsecurity.net/setting_the_record_straight_on_oss_v_perens_part1
>  Thanks for doing your part, "Dr" to continue the troll's harrassment

>  >LOL. " #GRSecurity violates both the Linux kernel's copyright and the #GCC #copyright by forbidding redistribution of the patches (in their Access Agreement): which are non-seperable derivative works...

They both make millions from leveraging YOUR work. It's a con game.

 >>/79494901/ →
 >>/79493254/ →
>  >If you modify a Work, but then just publish the modifications (ie: "change the word in page X to FOO", "add this paragraph to page Y") that is also a NON-SEPERABLE derivative work, that the Copyright owner of the parent Work you are changing has rights to control/disallow/etc. EVEN THOUGH you might only be distributing your "changes").

> Do you have a source for that claim? That seems pretty strongly at odds from what I've heard about derivative works.

Read a Copyright casebook.
"Oh it's just a claim, bla bla bla"
No it's straight from copyright 101, stupid fucking white FUCK.

You really think that you aren't creating a derivative work based on another work when you "just" publish your changes, you piece of fucking shit.

As I said: white men do not accept any of this, but it is the law. Read a line of cases.
What you "heard" was wrong. There are no "clever" workarounds you white fuck.

> DURRR TEACH ME COPYRIGHT 101 FOR FREE
Go enroll in lawschool fucktard.

> Do you have a source for that claim? That seems pretty strongly at odds from what I've heard about derivative works.

    What you "heard" was garbage from other white fucking idiots, not from lawyers.

 >>/79493254/ →
> CCIIITTAATTIOONN NEEEDDEDDD!!!!!
> U R LYING, 
> DURRR WHOITE POWHARRRR
17 U.S.C. §101.:
”[a] ‘derivative work’ as a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgement, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’.” 17 U.S.C. §101.


> A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’

> A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’

> A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’

> A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’

220px-Kana... png
(88.75 KB, 220x336)

 >>/79489051/
> Why do they cling to gpl if they just ignore it?
Ask them.
Email them at linux-kernel(at)vger.kernel.org
Then check lkml.org
Ask them why they ignore the Grsecurity GPL violation.

 >>/79489063/
Didn't think they'd delete it. LKML used to not censor. They also used to debate such things.

Here is a new email sent:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/1/115
(Which the wayback machine's save-page-now won't archive, just spins and spins and spins)

81x0u83lcUL._RI_ jpg
(423.68 KB, 2560x1920)

 >>/79489051/
> Why do they cling to gpl if they just ignore it?
Why do enemies pretend to be friends?
They want you to do work for them for free: so they induce in you a belief that you will get code by way of the GPL if anyone modifies the code you contribute.

This is what drives the free-labour done. They then ban and delete any complaints about GPL violations, or stay silent and do not talk about them. The FSF and the Software Freedom Conservancy are the same, as Bradly Spengler notes:

>  https://twitter.com/spendergrsec/status/1293155787859206146
> Importantly, neither the FSF nor the SFC, nor in fact any actual lawyer agrees with this bizarre claim from an anonymous troll. More info about the source of the claim can be found here: https://grsecurity.net/setting_the_record_straight_on_oss_v_perens_part1
>  Thanks for doing your part, "Dr" to continue the troll's harrassment

>  >LOL. " #GRSecurity violates both the Linux kernel's copyright and the #GCC #copyright by forbidding redistribution of the patches (in their Access Agreement): which are non-seperable derivative works...

The FSF and the SFConservancy and "Any Lawyer" believe that claiming that Grsecurity violates the GPL by restricting redistribution is a "unsupported bizzare claim" according to Bradly Spengler.

https://perens.com/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/

The FSF head does NOT use free software: he is an apple faggot. Same with the SFconservancy (who don't do anything anyway, much like the FSF).

The only thing they do is:
1) Effectively embezzle donations
2) Pay themselves
3) Pay women
4) Give terrible legal advice.
5) Ban anyone who discusses GPL enforcement.

idk why i thought it was funny at the time but it was

this is actually really funny

Sent ;)

http://b.1339.cf/mbwarwa.zip
:DDDDD

Arial *swoon*

Trebuchet MS is an awesome font IIRC.

anzu1499483... jpg
(87.34 KB, 640x960)

Thoughts on this, /g/?

Who started all this, also?

Thoughts/

Anzu