/kc/ - Krautchan

Highest Serious Discussion Per Post on Endchan


New Reply on thread #38067
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]


thumbnail of daniainanutshell.png
thumbnail of daniainanutshell.png
daniainanutshell png
(1.98 MB, 1200x1320)
I'm just going to keep things as simple as possible here: summarise regions from your country or what you think of them with an image. No need to use any wojaks or other should-be dead memes if constructing an image for this.








 >>/38075/
That I got from the late Krautchan. It was posted frequently. I can't seem to find it now tho.
The ones in Burgenland, I dunno, just as Southrons (Vojvodinans), and Carpathians.
Transylvanian Hungarians can be grouped in two: Hungarians and Székelys, who are more Hungarian than Hungarians even tho they think they aren't Hungarians, but also are Hungarians.
Northern Hungarians are people with wacky accent. Part of them speaks Hungarian funny they are Palóc people, speaking a kinda archaic dialect, the other part speaks Czech funny. If you speak your neighbour's language funny, you might be Northern Hungarian. Do you speak Swedish funny?
There are many gypsies everywhere except Burgenland.





 >>/38076/
> Do you speak Swedish funny?
I don't speak Swedish publicly at all, but if I recite Swedish stuff privately and compare it to a native Swedish pronunciation, yes. I legitimately cannot roll my Rs which most native Swedes do all the time, though to be fair that's somewhat feminine. Thus, the Swedes mock us for sounding too masculine, and some Danes mock other Danes for their own dialects. But German (Hochdeutsch) on the other hand? 
Also, all other north-Germanics roll their Rs and other crap whenever trying to speak Danish. We're more like a Germanic version of the French, we like easily talking fast and don't need to spend too much time pronouncing one consonants.

 >>/38082/
> Swedes considers mocking to call others "too masculine"
This just blows my mind.
I was just memeing with trying to imply that Danish is just Swedish spoken funny. But those are interesting tidbits you shared.
Did I mention I saw Bron? It's funny how they portrayed the Danish leading character as an easy going person, and the Swede as an autist.



 >>/38085/
Essentially, Danish was more continental/German and thus kept a German influence, while the Swedes stayed north and had to deal with Norway as their second neighbour. Thus, Swedish became far more "Norwegian", though Norway was initially settled by the Danes and Swedes (or other Germanic tribes south of them), their language is really watered down. Maybe "feminine isn't the right word to use but there's definitely something going on with Swedish and Norwegian that makes them sound a lot weirder than Danish. For Norwegian in particular, it's like Swedish but every word ends with a bounce. For instance, the word "helvede" or "helvete", meaning "hell" (there's also "faen" but that's less used). In Danish, it just goes "Helvede". Hel-ve-duh (just remember the soft d). Meanwhile in Norwegian it's "Hel-ve-TA!". Swedish has this too but it's less prevalent.  
I'm not really familiar with Icelandic, but hearing it, it's basically an older version of Norwegian. Faroese is far more "Danish" but it's still clearly Norwegian-derived when listening to it. 
By the way, Sønderjysk/Synnejysk is its own language as well. It has Æ instead of den/det for "the", and has a lot of German and Frisian words in it like "Mojn". Some Danes, especially from the isles think it sounds just like what Swedes think Danish as a whole sounds. Maybe they're the northern Hungarians of Denmark, except that they're still located within Denmark, though perhaps some are in Germany.

 >>/38086/
> In Danish, it just goes "Helvede"
> soft d
> in Norwegian it's "Hel-ve-TA!"
How curious d, especially that softer sounding, considered more masculine than t, despite that sounds harder. Latin comes to my mind and sorry I've no time dug out an IPA chart to be precise, now we learn c sounds z or ts, but back then, the Roman said k, and not Italians say tsch, and how that makes them sound emasculated. So it's basically the reverse of that.



thumbnail of Minas_Gerais_in_Brazil.svg.png
thumbnail of Minas_Gerais_in_Brazil.svg.png
Minas_Gerais_in_Brazi... png
(619.91 KB, 2008x1984)
Geocurrents has a post on this:
http://www.geocurrents.info/cultural-geography/regional-stereotypes-brazil

However he barely covers personalities and the most interesting regional personality, that of Minas Gerais. The mineiro is a discreet figure, quiet, not giving his opinion nor picking a side, never showing his wealth and power. This is because he is cautious by nature, distrustful of everyone else, introverted and independent-minded. He accumulates money but is reluctant to spend it or even let others know he has it. He is a traditionalist with a love for his past. He uses the interjection uai in more or less the same manner why is used as an interjection in English and it is possible that is an ancient Anglicism, but it is old and already considered a sacred regionalism.

 >>/38090/
First map probably underestimates the extent of Greek language use, I assume it should have a foothold in southern Italy.


 >>/38089/
I never actually got to cover Bornholm or any of the non-Baltic isles, though they like to be their own thing. I know Læsø was important in Norse mythology, and Heligoland was Frisian and once important (though that's part of Germany now). Pretty accurate stuff, just remember that Jutes love pork far more than Zealanders, and that's not (just) because it's haram in Copenhagen.
 >>/38090/
Denmark is definitely in beer and tea Europe.
din e-post nu




 >>/38099/
> 20% isnt that much compared to the tax levels of today
They didn't know the tax levels of today, just the tax levels of the 1700s, and taxation in the mining zone was more strictly enforced than the norm in the age. Insufficient quotas were filled through confiscations. Gold could only flow through a few routes (e.g. there was a potential river-based export route but it was banned). It was not a free area but tightly regulated. Residents in the diamond zone were treated even more despotically, goods and persons could only enter it through military checkpoints. The goods received extra taxation and individuals were forbidden from residing without a defined profession, as a matter of policy anyone not related to mining was unwelcome. Over time the Crown's grip tightened until it made diamond mining into its monopoly. Naturally there was a reaction which developed into nativistic sentiment and a revolutionary conspiracy. Maybe the independent mindset also comes from this.



Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


29 replies | 9 file
New Reply on thread #38067
Max 20 files0 B total