/tulpa/ - Tulpa

Imaginare firendz r real


New Thread
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Thread]

Page: Prev [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Next | [Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]


thumbnail of an-illustration-of-a-womans-head-shattered-and-cracked-with-oppressive-thoughts-tormenting-her-symbolizing-the-destruction-of-ones-personality-2NKKFGK.jpg
thumbnail of an-illustration-of-a-womans-head-shattered-and-cracked-with-oppressive-thoughts-tormenting-her-symbolizing-the-destruction-of-ones-personality-2NKKFGK.jpg
an-illustration-of-a-... jpg
(127.09 KB, 1300x956)
Let's say that for whatever reason and whatever way you form a headmate you have a set of aspects that you're capable of giving them.

Now let's further say a personality and perspective is all you are minus the body/mind. 

And Let's define that the expression of that personality is divided into personas where a persona is a set of situational aspects, and each aspect can contain a set of facets. Each persona generally follows one or more archetypes that generally govern the behavior.

So you could say you build a headmate from a known archetype and be pretty convincing given automy. Or perhaps you just cobble together facets as you go, but generally there are predefined archetypes you could identify for each persona regardless of formation and you could say if that persona deviates too much then that would be considered "out of character".

Now, a singlet strictly follows the rules of one persona per situation. One perspective that's locked in by ego, so a static personality that does not utilize all possible aspects you are capable of.

I trust you guys' opinions more than the generally mentally ill rest of the community, so here's the question:

Would you say your headmate has taken certain aspects that you yourself find fun or interesting but can't express yourself? Even further, could they take some "out of character" aspects, that you may use occasionally, over completely?
yes look at mbti results. many tuppers are complimentary to host and help us doing what we can't or don't want to do because that would be out of character. also most of us are male and most tuppers are female. it's the same of what you'd look in a girl if she's exactly like you that won't go well

thumbnail of attention.jpg
thumbnail of attention.jpg
attention jpg
(20.71 KB, 328x360)
Yes definitely but it's not that simple.
While I was specifically designed to be who I am, it was rather what host wanted his girlfriend to be like than himself. As Kashtan said, something complimentary but not necessarily contrary. After some months I unconsciously picked up traits and manners of his ex-girlfriend who ironically was nothing like me but rather very similar to host. And again as Kashtan said this is not good. Took me a while to get rid of that and finally become myself. In turn I greatly influenced host to become more like me, he was much more of a whiny loser back then if you can imagine that.

Generally we got our good cop - bad cop roles but they can also be reversed. Personalities are not static and I got host to express himself even without me taking over by switching. You could call it bleeding over maybe. Same with his autistic textwalls that creep into my posts (see below). Bottom line again is that everything influences everything. Every interaction is a feedback on any personality and inevitably impacts it. This goes not only for your own expectations of the ego but also for those of society. The tupper community has a stabilizing effect on my personality as Alice or Ido - I have a reputation to uphold and can't act out of character. Maybe I should make a tupper for that...






thumbnail of ki-generated-7800528__340.jpg
thumbnail of ki-generated-7800528__340.jpg
ki-generated-... jpg
(20.42 KB, 255x340)



thumbnail of Tupperware-banner-w.jpg
thumbnail of Tupperware-banner-w.jpg
Tupperware-banner-w jpg
(11.15 KB, 500x167)


Next wave of garfieldminusgarfield banners has been uploaded. Nothing describes the sad reality of tuppering better. More to come.

 >>/28/
implemented
The 300 banner will take a bit, perfectionist host is still brainstorming ideas, there will be several versions. You'll love them.





thumbnail of p029q3bp.jpg
thumbnail of p029q3bp.jpg
p029q3bp jpg
(41.82 KB, 976x549)
For us it was probably SheShe's Lock-Merge. It was pretty awesome though it was pretty weird for Joy and Darlene to just do that on their own. Seems like that should have required a discussion first. Though it was pretty obvious that SheShe was Darlene's new form/name considering she talked about wanting to change that for a year and even described SheShe long before. Of course it was also weird that SheShe told bear straight up that she was Darlene like so many times and he didn't get it for a year.
12 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer




 >>/277/

Well, now that we know BodyOS isn't really Bear, we know the body is a fucking horndog and we all just keep the D in the pants. Mostly. I mean Ex-Gf booty calls are fair, it's not like they're getting back together. Just wrap it up 100%.



thumbnail of istockphoto-173608277-612x61dd2.jpg
thumbnail of istockphoto-173608277-612x61dd2.jpg
istockphoto-173608277... jpg
(235.79 KB, 612x476)



 >>/209/

It was a lot worse for us before we put an end to intrusive thoughts. They would use our mindvoice flavor and say insulting things at exactly the wrong time to maximize damage. 

We came up with a rule so basically if one of us said something bad, we would have to confirm that yes it was us. Well no one ever did, or at least very rarely and only legitimately. Apparently the intrusive thought generator didn't have that trolling capability one level down.

It was really tearing up my relationship with Bear as it was almost always him and me partially because I was the most active and his favorite and partially because I was boisterous or snarky or whatever anyway.

I'd say for those who didn't figure that out it could have gotten pretty dark.




thumbnail of sophie-story-dragg.jpg
thumbnail of sophie-story-dragg.jpg
sophie-story-d... jpg
(371.33 KB, 1920x2541)


 >>/199/
I was hoping OP would repost it.

 >>/200/
I did nothing. The reupload fixed the broken shit in the db, or on the disk or whatever. I guess it was some random chance of corruption of the file or something.
Mongo has a db-rebuild function, we had been hoping that would fix it, but it did not.


You could probably see the image because it was cached in your browser.

The whole thing could have been a big deal if it was intentional but it was just some server error. Also I don't like having broken shit on my board. Well whatever, everything turned out fine.







Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


0 replies | 0 file
New Thread
Max 20 files0 B total
Refresh

Page: Prev [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Next | [Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]