michael... pdf
(70.35 KB, 0x0)
doc png
(1.01 MB, 1868x1012)
>>/132293/
Sexual assault cases depend on circumstantial evidence, since it's almost impossible to ever physically prove sexual assault. Most of the time, there's not much circumstantial evidence, since opportunistic abusers have no prior history of predation, and the abusers who do have a history try to be at least somewhat smart about it. Sosa on the other hand has literal gigabytes of data that will work as perfect circumstantial evidence. It doesn't matter if he wipes his phone or PC like he's always done. This isn't a matter of cops knocking at his door then leaving like in the past. The investigation can and will use his internet footprint against him, and considering how massive it is, it will be grounds for a subpoena to gain access to his electronics. Other women and girls will come forward for the investigation to corroborate his little sister's stories about him too. He is absolutely screwed.
This isn't a matter of internet retards calling the local PD to tell them Sosa is a pedro rapist then his mom stepping in to say it's just harassment. This is an actual court case with tons of evidence spanning the last decade tying into a real life case of incestuous, pedrophilic sexual assault. He's probably coping by saying no judge will believe a bunch of insane women's lies, saying there's no real proof, saying his sister is mentally ill, but deep down he knows he's fucked. There's no out of this.