a random news banner

/news/ - News

News & Current Events + Happenings + Fuck off jews


New Reply on thread #22338
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]


thumbnail of trade_offer.png
thumbnail of trade_offer.png
trade_offer png
(284.77 KB, 487x487)
I seem to vividly recall an individual speaking of checkpoints in which no Christians or Ukrainians, or no Christians or Slavs, were allowed to enter into certain areas. It may as well have had to do something with being Jewish. If you have no clue what I'm talking about, you may feel free to tell me to fuck off, but for the time being, I shall browse the catalogue hoping to refind what I seem to have lost.
 >>/22338/
Certainly possible, I think the same communities exist around certain cities like NY in the USSA today. Gated communities only meant and protected for the rich privileged so-called "elites" that is. Their real agenda is to bring back feudalism. Have a rich oligarchy class controlling all the political/governmental policy from secluded wealthy safe havens secluded from the rest of the country being impoverished and destabilized.
 >>/22339/
Yeah, it seems much more like a thing that would not be openly stated, but something everyone who is a member of said restaurant would merely know, non-Jewish/mason applicants being merely refused. That's as well in the same style as their method of psychological control, as no news outlets really state overtly that they're Jewish, but aren't too afraid that a minority of crazy internet freaks know the truth. It reminds me lastly of an instance of a Jewish restaurant a goy slave of Ghislaine Maxwell was visiting with, to which she was told by her superior master race overlord "They won't serve you here, you're a goy. Don't you know that?".
All in all, I suppose that is to be taken as with all things with perspective, to learn that since the anti-Whites are allowed to be extremely pro-Jewish, it's really not such a sin to prioritize the White race's wellbeing without like them, inflicting unnecessary suffering.
> If you have no clue what I'm talking about, you may feel free to tell me to fuck off
You're criticizing the enemy. The first person that tells you to fuck off for that gets kicked right out of here.
Secularized demographics are likely what is being set up in these war-contested areas once the collapse of the judes in their ethno-state comes to a head. Flows like this:
> judaism holds war against Palenstinian Christians and etc.
> judes collect money from their greatest ally who sadistically savors all the backstabbings
> system eventually collapses, throwing even their own under the bus
> privatized assets used to prop up current proxy war center Ukraine incentivizing travel for juden
> communities built on top of slaughtered opposition (in this case, those of us homogenously caucasoid)
> gates swung open only for judes due to being kicked out of every country no longer selectively asleep from the cretin's long history

Or, something akin to similar methods that are only faint attempts of covering up their tracks whilst pushing long held plans heretofor no one comes and challenges their eternally dead spirit.

Never stop questioning your enemy, even if it must be done in silence.
thumbnail of nobody reads this when I post it.png
thumbnail of nobody reads this when I post it.png
nobody reads this... png
(2.98 MB, 1944x1209)
 >>/22354/
We've been silent for too long. Stuck at the backwoods of the internet because they censor all their mainstream social media. As Spain anon at /pol/ put it, the guy who owns the Daily Wire loves bad exposure and has more book sales the madder people get. If you don't live in a ZOGwellian hellscape such as Britain or Germany or 12 other European nations subject to the same penalties of arrest, go for publicity. Unless you can be canceled and terminated from your job in the U.S.
thumbnail of g3ge3ge.jpeg
thumbnail of g3ge3ge.jpeg
g3ge3ge jpeg
(8.98 KB, 252x250)
 >>/22357/
 >>/22357/
> the guy who owns the Daily Wire loves bad exposure and has more book sales the madder people get.

It's called being a "shock jock". It's nothing new. 

It used to be hip hop singers and people like eminem and that one producer he had pulling the strings would do that. But now they're going into RW circles it seems.

Before that, it was people like Voltaire acting that way. With him mostly doing it to defame and lower the status of the French Nobility during King Louis' monarchy. Or Karl Marx spouting nonsense. Depends on the person and situation and current social climate.
thumbnail of (10).jpg
thumbnail of (10).jpg
(10) jpg
(74.43 KB, 497x523)
 >>/22406/
Only scum and our enemies seek publicity these past triple decades. It used to be like the Goebbels maxim here in this quote, but that was long before my time. The enemy is no longer afraid. Call him a scoundrel, swindler, profiteer, degenerate, sick fuck, demented lunatic and especially a jew;  he wears those badges with pride.

The only thing left is to call them what they really are. Parasites.

It's not even the "Nazi" word for us anymore. Call us white. "All whites raycis" bullshit. Because now it's sadly our people who shrink back. Everyone of European descent. We should be seeking publicity to have a stronger voice.
 >>/22408/
You may not like what I have to say, perhaps, but consider the fact we as civilians are all under diabolical levels of psychological warfare and 24/7 State-sponsored propaganda/censorship campaigns today. I've suggested this once before, perhaps it is time once again considering that fact. Maybe it is time we flip their propagandist narratives against them, the Jews? Every time they call us "Nazis" or "fascists" or "white supremacists" maybe we start calling them the same thing? After all it is a type of psychological warfare that works so well against anyone speaking the truth, so why not turn all the same slander back onto those liars and propagandists? If anything it might work to neutralize the meaning of their slander making public division and hostility against us much less effective in the long-run? If we were to trial-run it and it worked to shift the public perspective I would say all is fair when it comes to information warfare.
thumbnail of nazi.jpg
thumbnail of nazi.jpg
nazi jpg
(200.8 KB, 973x784)
thumbnail of Anti fascist is anti group.jpg
thumbnail of Anti fascist is anti group.jpg
Anti fascist is anti... jpg
(189.73 KB, 800x575)
thumbnail of Fascism examples.jpg
thumbnail of Fascism examples.jpg
Fascism examples jpg
(226.17 KB, 960x348)
 >>/22413/
"Nazi" was a Bavarian slur anyway. Actual National Socialists do not use it (aside from Goebbels with a couple tongue in cheek titles). As for Fascist, that's any organized group with any purpose. I'm not offended by either accusation leveled against the enemy. Nor accusing them of propaganda, since they're the ones who changed the definition.

Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


9 replies | 7 file
New Reply on thread #22338
Max 20 files0 B total