/operate/ - Endchan Operations

 >>/19269/
>  But I suggest to save all the content worth saving, in case have to repost it later.

I didn't even think of that, come to think of it I heard of one moderator who did that to his boards from another server. Thanks for the advice!

Problem should be resolved now. Try the new account.

 >>/27102/
I don't need this shit. It's not ok to change these things without askin other ppls' opinion, imo

 >>/26405/
They all plugged in some captcha solver service, they can have human resolvers. Some of the captchas can be pre-resolved too but they are time sensitive. The good thing about them that it costs money for the attacker.

 >>/25496/
>  But I suggest to save all the content worth saving, in case have to repost it later.
I didn't even think of that, come to think of it I heard of one moderator who did that to his boards from another server. Thanks for the advice!

b

946 png
(212.31 KB, 529x296)

Hey, Admins. You should probably switch to hCaptcha.
Stop the shit spammer once and for all because they're images.
I doubt a bot could solve it. They're not AIs.

 >>/24538/
Already tried

 >>/24538/
> They're not AIs.

Wrong

 >>/24538/
They all plugged in some captcha solver service, they can have human resolvers. Some of the captchas can be pre-resolved too but they are time sensitive. The good thing about them that it costs money for the attacker.

How about hiding them with custom css?

 >>/18265/
Is this possible? If so what do I put in my custom .css to do so?

 >>/18271/
I will take a look.

 >>/18271/
You can select these particular elements you want to hide with the :nth-child(x) selector, where the x is the number of the element.
The elements of the form is in the table and the "Password" and "Drawing" fields are in the 5th and 6th table rows, or in the 4th and 5th if you force anonymity via your board's settings (ie. no "Name" field).
Then you can use display: none; css rule to hide elements (there are other options, if you prefer something else you can use that ofc);
Since no other table rows on the page you could use the following:

tr:nth-child(4), tr:nth-child(5) {
  display: none;
}

Or:

tr:nth-child(5), tr:nth-child(6) {
  display: none;
}

Depending on the Name field, as I wrote above. This is important, you don't want to hide captcha accidentally or something.

 >>/26983/
> If Tor reporting is blocked on /pol/ it ends up here.
/pol/ doesn't block Tor reporting. Of course we bring up the fact that the Tor project has many jews on their team whenever there's a /pol/ Tor shitpost. However, Tor is not restricted by me with any settings. Such settings don't even exist. The punishment since I can't ban Tor is to delete their shitposts. Genuine intelligent posting by Tor users is left alone. I have never tried reporting on Tor because I refuse to use it. As for your other points, I'm not suggesting otherwise. The point being, I as the BO of /pol/ have no control over how the site as a whole works. If you're having issues with Tor reporting, start a Twitter account and bring it up to Odilitime. The Meta thread on /pol/ is a sticky. You may post from Tor there and reference the offending thread as an alternative to reporting.

 >>/10257/ 
> click reload

I did, 20 times, and it kept saying "wrong answer or expired captcha". that's the issue

> wtf

if you can complete no cookie captcha with javascript disabled in the same tab then post some screenshots and a tutorial

 >>/10253/
< works for me
learn to type faggot

 >>/10264/ 
kill yourself illiteratespergy

 >>/11682/
captcha

 >>/11327/
You can select these particular elements you want to hide with the :nth-child(x) selector, where the x is the number of the element.
The elements of the form is in the table and the "Password" and "Drawing" fields are in the 5th and 6th table rows, or in the 4th and 5th if you force anonymity via your board's settings (ie. no "Name" field).
Then you can use display: none; css rule to hide elements (there are other options, if you prefer something else you can use that ofc);
Since no other table rows on the page you could use the following:

tr:nth-child(4), tr:nth-child(5) {
  display: none;
}

Or:

tr:nth-child(5), tr:nth-child(6) {
  display: none;
}

Depending on the Name field, as I wrote above. This is important, you don't want to hide captcha accidentally or something.

This thread?

https://web.archive.org/web/20170603035754/http://endchan.xyz/tech/res/597.html

The board was slid by a spammer. Endchan doesn't keep backups.

Damn, you saved my ass, didn't even check if it was already archived. I'm an idiot. Thanks dude.

woah

valid?

 >>/9177/
dude woah, wut?

Btw /agatha2/index.rss is broken. There is an XML parsing error due to & in the title. It should be replaced with &amp . Other boards like /news/ have the same problem, while those not having & have a functioning index.rss, like /operate/index.rss or /polru/index.rss .
You can check if an RSS feed is valid with an RSS feed validator like https://validator.w3.org/feed .

 >>/18804/
made a fix for this.

 >>/18851/
Thank you. Seems good now.

Lady of... png
(1.42 MB, 1000x1333)

Speaking of feature requests: we're still waiting on the Odilitime jock strap crotch-cam live stream RSS feed.

 >>/18900/

kys

I'm not aware that the contents of the subject field can be edited. 8kun uses a different board engine, what feature one imageboard supports other chans might not.
I think a good rule to follow (with the editable part of the posts too) is to think first, then post.

 >>/11557/
See? Forgot the role signature. Here it is for validation.

 >>/11557/
sounds like mistakes in subject field are irrevocable, then.
kind of a problem for this board, because it's a bu when msm crashes 8kun, so when it's active, it's very fast and different people with dif experience levels are making threads - mistakes inevitably happen.

Would you consider making the subject field editable (i guess the question is, Why not? If the programming isn't onerous, it would be a real plus.)

 >>/11560/
thanks for reply btw
appreciate it.

 >>/11560/
There are a couple of projects going on in parallel - besides the busyness of the daily life - I really doubt we will implement subject editing in the foreseeable future, but it is an intriguing suggestion, so I'm gonna nag the development team, maybe they'll say "easy peasy lemon squeezy, here it is. E.".

wait. OP/insaneposter is not odili? or is he odili and pretending not to be?

 >>/10237/
I'll talk to Lynx about it. Surprised they're not already.

 >>/10266/
maybe they are  >>/10095/

 >>/10292/
ah ok i see  >>/10109/

 >>/26346/
Why sir?

Thanks for the report.

Bring it up to /pol/ in the future to remove any calls for violence. They will be taken down. The Feds crying about censorship will not change deletion of their attempts.

 >>/10805/
No. You live alongside of other communities. Like many other users here on Endchan, I am not here merely to accommodate you or your board. If Tor reporting is blocked on /pol/ it ends up here.

I realize this is not an ideal situation. In that respect I emphasize the following:

1. Unblocking Tor reporting may not be an option as too many others use it to play troll-ball with /pol/.
2. This thread is not a criticism of /pol/.
3. This thread is not meant to be a challenge to /pol/.
4. The Endchan /pol/ mod staff have always been reliable and consistent in dealing with these issues when they are available to do so.
5. Not even our site admins can babysit things 24x7.

Like occasional CP postings from times past, this was an emergency whole site compromising situation without the traditional means to report it. The situation was dealt with. Thank you, Mr. Global. This thread now has no purpose other than to attract meaningless grousing. We already have a /pol/ containment thread here if further bitching about this or whatever issue is required. I suggest it may be worthwhile to delete or lock this thread to allow everyone move on.

 >>/10806/
> If Tor reporting is blocked on /pol/ it ends up here.
/pol/ doesn't block Tor reporting. Of course we bring up the fact that the Tor project has many jews on their team whenever there's a /pol/ Tor shitpost. However, Tor is not restricted by me with any settings. Such settings don't even exist. The punishment since I can't ban Tor is to delete their shitposts. Genuine intelligent posting by Tor users is left alone. I have never tried reporting on Tor because I refuse to use it. As for your other points, I'm not suggesting otherwise. The point being, I as the BO of /pol/ have no control over how the site as a whole works. If you're having issues with Tor reporting, start a Twitter account and bring it up to Odilitime. The Meta thread on /pol/ is a sticky. You may post from Tor there and reference the offending thread as an alternative to reporting.

 >>/10806/
And to be clear, I'm not asking you to accommodate /pol/. I'm inviting you to post issues in the Meta thread there. Whatever you choose is your choice.

Note: it is possible to get a "banned" alert if you use an IP which was banned previously (it could be a proxy, or VPN, or even a legit residential IP if it is distributed as dynamic IP).
I asked when was the ban because I checked the last couple of days in the logs (they are public, home page has the link to them) and I've found no ban with the reason "real spam".

 >>/19665/
An hour or 2 ago.

 >>/19667/
Ah. No such ban was issued.
However some time ago in tandem with the usual cp spam there was another one that said "real rape of women" or something the like. I believe the ban message denotes that particular one. In this case the IP you used was banned some time ago, and wasn't issued to your post with screenshots of a libre vidya game.

 >>/20290/
From: https://support.torproject.org/faq/staying-anonymous/
> Ultimately the best protection is a social approach: the more Tor users there are near you and the more diverse their interests, the less dangerous it will be that you are one of them. Convince other people to use Tor, too!
I will like to say:
"There's only one thing this place needs, more Tor posters."

 >>/27338/
An hour or 2 ago.