/agatha2/ - E-Girl Purgatory

e-girl gossip & drama


New Reply on thread #107881
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]


thumbnail of 1605840567653.png
thumbnail of 1605840567653.png
1605840567... png
(1.75 MB, 750x1334)
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@kennedicotarelo
Letterboxd: https://letterboxd.com/heartbeat/
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/user/flowerco
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/194172735@N06/
Tumblr: https://throbbinggristle.tumblr.com/
Fragrantica: https://www.fragrantica.com/member/1299311
Blogspot: https://lovesickloveletters.blogspot.com/ (inactive)
RYM: https://rateyourmusic.com/~lovesick

Previous thread:  >>/100541/























thumbnail of 52470408546_9537dee3c0_o.png
thumbnail of 52470408546_9537dee3c0_o.png
52470408546_9537dee3c... png
(1.36 MB, 989x660)
This year's official Kennedi Halloween playlist: https://open.spotify.com/playlist/7JdSoGIWIRoofW7Gh4B8KJ

> to be paired with: the driller killer (1979), martin (1977), slaughter high (1986), sleepaway camp (1983), chopping mall (1986), torso (1973), color me blood red (1965), new york ripper (1982), phantasm (1979), deep red (1975)












thumbnail of newyorkripper.jpg
thumbnail of newyorkripper.jpg
newyorkripper jpg
(195.93 KB, 1700x800)
 >>/108513/
i am intrigued by this microtrend of theorybrained e-leftists with ostensibly "highbrow" tastes giving a pass to the most vapid/lurid/exploitative trash imaginable, such as splatter cinema, drill rap, chart pop and oddball celeb cults. do they get some sort of illicit thrill out of engaging with prolefeed? is it out of some painful duty to the unwashed masses? how can endchan's favorite schoolmarm, who wags her pale little finger at squirming faggot andy warhol's art films, condone a misogynist masterpiece like the new york ripper? i mean forget "the male gaze", this is straight up rape gaze. does the ultrasleaze somehow tilt it into subversion?

> inb4 touch grass, seek help, have sex, just let people enjoy things, you're not interesting for dunking on pop culture etc




 >>/109067/
The answer is that leftists don't actually care about any social issues, they just want an excuse to virtue signal, to feel like a rebel, and to engage in tribalism by having an "us vs them" against another group. They're also NPCs who will do whatever they're told.
Gotta read between the lines and apply some cynicism in these situations.







 >>/109067/
Her only liked review for that movie seems to explain her reasons for liking it. 
https://letterboxd.com/fuchsiadyke/film/the-new-york-ripper/
> A part of me accepts that, yes, this is gross exploitation. Fulci is not an enlightened soul, and what he depicted here is carnal, weird, and violent in a manner that is anything but sympathetic, humane, or nurturing. But another part of me looks at things like that video of a woman getting catcalled for ten hours in New York and thinks that maybe Fulci was just depicting something honest. Note how the violence against women in this film aren't just from one fucked up weirdo, but from men everywhere.











 >>/109098/
TRUE!
 >>/109067/
its obvious kennedi relishes media depicting women being assaulted/violated in ways she perceives to already occur frequently in our society
> all men are monsters that take womens bodies and use them for whatever they want.. ugh.. *furiously rubs*













 >>/109514/
that's the main contradiction of self-righteous femists like ken. patriarchy is both an external ideology that men are born into without having the chance to choose otherwise, and a sinful essence they embody and for which they are to be blamed eternally. you can't be socialized into being a male chauvinist and still bear complete responsibility for it, as if you had unadulterated agency on the matter, but they want it both ways because identifying a clear cut culprit to whom you can ascribe any blame makes it easier for them.

 >>/109576/
If you're an ideological feminist I can see you reducing most of Dwoskin's filmography to an exercise in male gaze, even if it's much more than that.
The thing is, ken is an ideological feminist, so I can't see how she can also like something she's supposed to hate according to her extremely rigid ideology without being hypocritical or at least inconsistent.
My opinion is that she hasn't actually thought through what she believes in because she's adopted certain views just for their aesthetic value and the social status that comes with it. I'm also aware that most of her orbiters don't care whether she's a poser or not because all they really want is a cute little doll to play with.

 >>/109729/
 >>/109730/
The answer is that there's no actual ideology behind it. Feminism, communism, socialism, leftism. It's all just an excuse to feel like a rebel and victim, and to have a bad guy to point to. Inconsistencies are completely irrelevant, because it's all just irrational excuses. None of them actually believe anything.
Don't get me started on how feminism is literally just parental trauma.



 >>/109730/
Lmao what views of hers does she just hold for aesthetics? Like others have said, she hasnt even talked about communism publicly in a while, only radfem bs which she knows turns off men and most women. So I don’t know what social status she’s gaining. To me lately it seems like she’s trying to repel men if anything.


 >>/109738/
the only excuse here is you, that is an excuse for a human being. don't worry, I won't get you started. as I would with anyone who's too ignorant to discuss a set of ideas on their own merit and needs to resort to ad hominems and psychologize their opponent, I'll just tell you to shut up.

 >>/109759/
where on earth do you live, fucking Wyoming? holding vague feminist views is a must in the kind of urban, pseudo-intellectual circles of friends she's part of


 >>/109841/
> "too ignorant to discuss"
> is the one refusing to discuss
Can't make this shit up lmao. The fucking irony. Crazy how it's always leftists who try to run away from discussing a topic.
If you don't wanna discuss, that's fine. But don't act like you're superior, or like you "won" something. Utter delusion.





I've jacked off so many times to the thought of going down on Ken it's unreal. The idea of licking and tasting her vagina and her gentle moaning gets me hornier than a fucking hound.







 >>/110642/
Having sex is how women reward men.
Refusing sex is how women punish men.
Sex is a bargaining chip.
> jerking off to the thought of pleasuring a woman

Anon please stop. Your test levels are dangerously low and getting lower as we speak. I hope to God you don't watch anime.





 >>/110594/
It's only "low test" in women's eyes, don't forget that. They'll legit lose respect for a man if he likes to eat pussy. Which is fucking crazy. It's something for HER benefit, but she still shits on the man for doing it for her. And for liking it.
They do the exact same thing with romance, physical affection, opening up, and kindness. The only way to do these things with a woman seems to be to act like you hate it, and like you're only doing it because she's nagged you into doing them.
Without exaggeration, the literal fastest way to make a woman break up with you is to be kind to her. Sounds stupid, I know, but if you're experienced, you know what I mean.

 >>/110642/
hahah
 >>/110647/
 >>/110781/
because womens lizard brain will never let them forget the fact that they are the help gender and any man who is overly concerned with their needs is low value and naturally, subsequently, logically, factually, as a result, to be detested
Better just try and break your social conditioning and stop eating the kitty kat, fag boy

 >>/110826/
That's a very good point. I just assumed they yearn for mistreatment due to being coddled all their life, but what you said makes more sense. I gotta upgrade my cynicism.
I'll continue to be into eating pussy, I just won't tell them about it. And I won't be kind, romantic, or affectionate, either, cause they hate that too. Recently I've seriously been thinking of throwing away all this "serious relationship" bullshit and turning into a player, and treating women transactionally,  and like fuckholes.
Great work, women. You're turning men who treat you well into ones who only interact with you strictly for personal benefit and then discard you. Great use of power you've been given in society, eh? Literally making the world worse.







 >>/110861/
I'm not trying to shame you, I'm trying to make you understand that you're in no position to talk about how to attract women when you're partaking in a mix of all the most pussy-drying activities known to man; incelposting in a board dedicated to the stalking of an unwilling female internet personality.
Your input is irrelevant, you're a dumb monkey in a cage like the rest of us, so stay in your lane.


 >>/110912/
 >>/110921/
They will call you every name in the book, but they'll never call you "wrong". They have absolutely nothing other than passive social shaming insults over and over. Pathetic.
It's like when women get turbo mad when you mention the roast beef pussy meme. If it weren't true, they wouldn't have such an emotional reaction.












 >>/111113/
It's been a while, but IIRC it was a head shot of her looking slightly to the right, with a sweater on, and a kinda blank expression. (I didn't find it on Google, and I don't have a Ken folder.)
Being natural is important to me, I hate fake shit like makeup, angles, poses, etc., so I much prefer the sincerity of showing one's imperfections, rather than aiming to be "perfect" and just ending up unoriginal and copying everyone else.



 >>/111159/
Not sure, I'm not enough of a Ken scholar to know dates, but it was definitely many years ago. But for the record, I meant asthetically\ideologically, not sexually, so don't push degeneracy onto me.
Don't make me regret saying something nice about women for once.

 >>/111159/
I think I know the picture essayposter is referring to and it's from when she was 16. I don't know what he means by he preferred her ideology back then when it was exactly the same. As for aesthetics, she presented herself the same way, except she had the retarded eyebrow makeup thing going on. I honestly think her face looks identical to how it did back then if you account for that one difference. And I guess she wears eyeliner now but it doesn't change her face imo.




 >>/111174/
 >>/111177/
Fuck you, I didn't even have to try.

Kennedi's pussy.
I'm sure you want to hear something suggestive or vulgar regarding this topic, but personally, I'm more interested in the metaphorical meaning of the "pussy", and the psychology behind it.
In the far past, Ken has made a few posts about topics like feminism, anti-men, communism, anti-porn, etc., and, while it may be cathartic in the moment to analyze these beliefs and ideologically dunk on them, you gotta consider the motivation behind such posts.
I'm no Ken scholar, but as I understand it, she has sadly had some issues growing up, as well as some bad experiences with men. While I don't approve of attacking innocent men, in a way, it's kinda understandable for her to react like this. Anyone would be at least a little fucked up by experiences like those. Like I said months ago, she seemed like someone who had some issues and was just venting and irrationally lashing out at men in that moment, so it's not productive to just dunk on her, especially now that it's been years since she espoused those views.
While some users have claimed certain things about Ken that would suggest that she has a roast beef pussy, I speculate that she has the opposite, a metaphorically tightly closed off one, analogous to her mentally\emotionally keeping men at arm's length.
Past abuse, bad experiences with men, and any anti-men or "men are dangerous" content she consumed in the past probably shaped her personality, for better or for worse. Perhaps some asthetics that so many anons like, indirectly have some dark origins. I suspect that she could benefit from a good amount of time with a kind and patient Chad boyfriend to help unwind any issues that she hasn't unwound already. (Being gentle is good, but if it's an average man, there's probably little interest, so in practice he needs to be both kind and good looking.)
I've actually been with a woman who had some bad experiences in the past, and who because of them, had a metaphorically and physically tight pussy, so I hope I'm not assuming too much when I say that I can kinda sympathize, and kinda understand, at least a tiny bit. (Obligatorily, she seemed to really enjoy me eating her pussy. Good times.)
Notice my repeated use of terms like "in the past". Again, it's not productive to criticize her now for the mental situation she was in in the past. I understand how it can be frustrating when people don't make that distinction. Internet posts have the issue of people assuming that the post is recent, in the sense that they think the author's beliefs in the post are the ones they have in the present day.
I don't really keep up with the Ken lore, so I don't know if these days she holds any anti-porn, anti-men, anti-sex, etc. views, but I hope she's feeling better about those topics these days, and isn't so strict about it, especially not to the point where it harms her love life or ability to be emotionally intimate.
I hope she has gotten over all her issues, really. It may seem like I criticize women out of hatred, but it's the complete opposite, I genuinely care about them and wish that they become better people, and that they ditch any retardation they might have. (If I were facing an actual woman (as opposed to fucking long autistic rants), I'd be far more serious and constructive in my criticism.)

So, take care of yourself, Ken. We're all genuinely rooting for you to do well. And at the end of the day, aren't we all just people who are a little fucked up? Heh.

I took time from working to write this. Also, we're in the first week of NNN, and I already want to eat some FUCKING PUSSY. I want it on my mouth and tongue.


its kinda easy to forget ken definitely suffered the most in life out of any of these girls. not just in childhood but as an adult. idk how she isnt more fucked up to be honest. i hope shes doing ok











thumbnail of ken6.jpg
thumbnail of ken6.jpg
ken6 jpg
(11.93 KB, 255x255)
 >>/107881/
went through archives and compiled all the pictures i found on a pinterest board. there were many more  that i couldn't download in high res so if anyone could send me more pictures it would be great :-)

link to pinterest board: https://pin.it/3w5q1Ylxl
discord: seekingprogress






 >>/111948/
 >>/111908/
She has said many times she doesn't want more attention. She's gone out of her way to minimize her internet presence. I think you should take the board down, because it would encourage more harassment of her by newfags. People who already know about her have pics already and know where to find them on here. There are 0 benefits to having the pinterest up and tons of downfalls, the biggest one being Ken will be even more paranoid and less likely to ever post pics again. Not moralfagging, just logistics.

 >>/111908/
there's no way anyone receives the pineapple pic well yes? why is it so centrally placed or even on there ata ll?
even the pics from the eyebrow era have their own unique, coarse kind of allure to them but the pineapple one she just looks like a complete dysgenic zombie waiting for someone to slash her throat so she can be over with everything









 >>/112696/
Lol, the pinterest poster is obviously the teenage girl who ususally stays in Bianca threads. She archives a lot of random girls and takes requests. I don't think she knows much about Ken if she even knows anything.


thumbnail of d564b8614c69d34085d25cad907c33f2.jpg
thumbnail of d564b8614c69d34085d25cad907c33f2.jpg
d564b8614c69d34085d25... jpg
(13.64 KB, 382x364)
 >>/112698/
hi, not the same teenage girl lol :-) i do like archiving random girls as well though, i think kennedi is really beautiful and i like her style hence why i chose to archive her as well. i'll admit i know little about her, other than what i've learnt from reading threads about her and talking to people that knew ken, which is why i took the board down :-)!

 >>/112911/
You seem nice so I'll let you in on something important. The people who like to claim they knew Ken almost always never had more than one or two convos with her as a complete stranger. They're telling you that they knew her because they're hoping you have info you'll trust them with. Be very fucking distrusting comes to people talking about her. 

On discord, the usual offenders are Elliot and someone else I won't mention because he likes the attention.

thumbnail of 1593958538333.png
thumbnail of 1593958538333.png
1593958538333 png
(288.89 KB, 700x700)
Kennedi created us... She nurtured us...
And we loved her... Did everything for her...
We eliminated her detractors... And ourselves, so that she could thrive...
She liked it... And as a reward SHE DESTROYED US
AND KILLED US
WHY


















How do you think Kennedi really feels about Trump winning? He took a pro-abortion stance which should please her feminist interests, beyond that I don't really see why she'd care too much about the economy since as a woman she shouldn't be worrying about income, that's the men's duty, communism is a meme anyway and fuck trannies too. Maybe she's pro-trump now.




 >>/115127/
Who cares about the trannyviroment lmao. Fusion energy will solve all carbon emissions and terraforming tech will allow us to resolve all these non-issues created within this era, the co2 emissions will stop long before they become a major issue. Europe destroyed its economy because of this nonsense led by whiny autistic women. Muh fucking trees bro. Let's focus on development and progress, stop attaching yourselves to this pathetic little planet.


 >>/115178/
All of those problems can only be resolved with technological developments, too. Once the problem becomes big enough, the investments towards a solution will become larger, as is usually the case in free market economies. What is Europe's solution to the problem? Tax their citizens for using plastic products, lmao. And look where those Eurocucks are now, their leaders are giving speeches on how Europe is now facing an "existential crisis". This is besides the point of how even if the west stopped using such products like good little cucks, authoritarian states won't, because their only interests are going to be largely masculine strategic interests rather than feminine emotional interests. The only way to stop those authoritarian states from polluting is to offer them a better alternative which can only come through technological developments.





 >>/115211/
You worship science like it's a religion. 
Your belief in scientists coming up with a cure for all the world's problems once the time is ripe is entirely based on faith, but unlike theists you don't even have the dignity to admit it.
You are the soy.

 >>/115225/
I worship the concept that in order to have economic development and thus technological developments, you need capitalism. 
The soy meme is making fun of middle class liberals that treat science like a religion without understanding it, and treat the word of scientists as the word of God. Typically pro-vaxx because scientists told them so. 
Or you could do like Europe and take the anti-market approach and let your economy go into freefall while having to pay 5 euros for a plastic straw to "save the environment" while the Americucks are testing reusable rockets, AI, fusion energy and perhaps even the possibility of terraforming Mars. I will agree however that capitalism doesn't tend to do a good job of dealing with such issues as pollution but seeing where things are headed and the historical trends I'd say I'm fairly optimistic for the future and taking the gut reaction of panicking about present issues might not be so wise, for example the carbon tax in some European countries is how they chose to deal with car pollution, in the US there was no carbon tax and instead you had Tesla motors which created an EV revolution that caused a sort of widespread adoption of EVs, I think time and time again capitalism seems to show it's quite a lot more effective than you'd really like to think, and seems like most western countries are now moving in that direction.



 >>/115235/
> The soy meme is making fun of middle class liberals that treat science like a religion without understanding it, and treat the word of scientists as the word of God
That's exactly what you sound like.
Your claim that science will solve all forms of pollution and depletion on Earth just because everyone wants it really badly is faith-based religion, you just replaced Jesus as a savior with scientists.
In truth the scientific consensus is that exploiting the planet's resources at the current rate is completely unsustainable and there is no miracle or space travel (= science worshipper's heaven) at the end of the line.
You are exactly the same type of soyboy you hate, same product with different package.

You guys are mega retarded for thinking they give a shit about improving the People's lives in any way lmao.
You're arguing and fighting among yourselves, meanwhile you're seen as tax cattle, that's it. Funnier still is you're being outright told this, you won't change how you act at all.

It's funny to see people expecting scientists and researchers to fix the world's problems, not realizing that they're all paid to reach a predetermined conclusion, and any scientific development is highly manipulated and controlled, and guaranteed to not be in common people's best interest.





 >>/115249/
> Your claim that science will solve all forms of pollution and depletion on Earth just because everyone wants it really badly 
Not science, capitalism. Not wants, but NEEDS.
The psychology behind why anyone tackles any problem really just comes down to "I will be rich!". That's Edison, Ford, Musk, and really all other inventors you can think of. You get rid of capitalism, and now there's no further incentive for anyone to tackle big problems since there's really no point to it, better to just go into corruption instead (welcome to the communist world). There's an endless list of evidence that show capitalism is very fucking effective at solving human problems. There's not a single evidence of leftist economic models ever solving any fucking problem.
> In truth the scientific consensus is that exploiting the planet's resources at the current rate is completely unsustainable
Fuck your scientific consensus, scientists are cuckolds that are paid to reach certain "conclusions". They operate on the same free market principles of seeking to supply whatever is in demand (there is a lot of money in proving that muh earth is dying). Yeah, at the current rate we will surely run out of resources at some point, just like how we will eventually run out of coal and we won't be able to operate our steam engines any longer, oh wait, we don't use steam engines anymore, how did scientists not predict that?!
Ultimately humans operate on reward, instead of eliminating reward, seek to create a system that rewards "positive" behavior, rather than "negative" behavior (for example, corruption was illegal in the USSR, yet the reward for it was far too great to ignore, and also the only "reward"). 
I also want to point out the fact that all investment towards a potential solution to microplastics and other form of pollution is literally coming from the USA. While the the green eurocucks are doing fuck all about it besides taxing the average person while they get assfucked by niggers and Russia due to economic decline. 
You present no solution to the problem besides pointing out the problem, as is typical of leftist ideology.

 >>/115326/
Kinda. It's fine to care, and it has a positive effect, but just be aware it's probably not much, compared to the gazillions of emissions\waste\etc. created by industry and other sources.
Honestly it seems a lot of people do that stuff more for the feeling of being a "good citizen" rather than a desire to help the environment.
You should always do the right thing, regardless.

 >>/115357/
Yep, you should do the right thing so the elites can fly their private jets. Why are leftists so passive and submissive? In a masculine, male-led society all parties would be held accountable, and those causing the most harm wouldn't be able to get away with it without seeing some seething chud at their doorstep.
You do the "right thing", I'll do whatever the fuck I want, and get rich in the process too.

 >>/115352/
> Not science, capitalism
Capitalism is just an economic system, it can't solve the problem, it can only incentivize endeavors that may or may not lead to the solution.
What will the endeavor be? Sorcery? Prayer? Maybe some kind of nondescript fictional science that doesn't exist but that you put all your blind faith in?
> There's an endless list of evidence that show capitalism is very fucking effective at solving human problems
There's an endless list of evidence that show capitalism is contributing to this problem. The issues tied to environmental decline are already visible and in full effect, agro-industries are losing billions to soil desertification and erosion. On the contrary medical institutions only have to gain from all the people getting ill from the pollution in our air and food.
> how did scientists not predict that?!
You're the only one here who's treating scientists like oracles that will save our souls when the time is right.  Science isn't prediction.
> I also want to point out the fact that all investment towards a potential solution to microplastics and other form of pollution is literally coming from the USA
Of course, and after that the messiah of scientific industrialism Elon Musk will grab your hand and take you to space Eden where everything will be right.


 >>/115358/
> Why are leftists so passive and submissive?
Mental weakness leads to an overreliance on social groups, which leads to them indirectly being forced to follow everything the group says, as the worst thing for them is not having any social group.
This means that they can't do anything that strays from the group, like speaking up, leading anything, criticizing anything that's "protected", so they just remain passive and do whatever the group leader tells them. And that leader can be something like the media.



 >>/115359/
> Capitalism is just an economic system, it can't solve the problem, it can only incentivize endeavors that may or may not lead to the solution.
Precisely. Those "incentives" are better than the nothingness of socialist economies.
> What will the endeavor be? Sorcery? Prayer? Maybe some kind of nondescript fictional science that doesn't exist but that you put all your blind faith in?
I can't predict that, but leaving the system open to innovation from private individuals and rewarding those who solve the biggest problems is probably a good idea. 
> There's an endless list of evidence that show capitalism is contributing to this problem.
Capitalism doesn't do much more other than supply demands, you could ban "demands" of harmful goods, like plastic, but that would increase costs for the average person which isn't desirable, you could degrowth as some leftists now want to save muh planet, but that won't solve the problem of neighboring right wing societies outcompeting you. The "problem" is that human demands are endless, and that is unchangeable, but it does seem that humans are also very adaptable and perhaps allowing that adaptability to take its full potential might be a better solution than restricting it through socialism and degrowth in the hopes of perhaps saving humanity by forcing it to not change or consume.

 >>/115358/
> and those causing the most harm wouldn't be able to get away with it without seeing some seething chud at their doorstep.
Just to reiterate this point. I remember when Alex Jones was always seething and punching walls over pollution caused by indsutry, while leftist cucks laughed at him in their smug little fucking ways while sucking Elon Musk's dick, this was the peak soyboy era. Alex Jones is how I'd imagine every working class man to be in a proper right wing, masculine society. The elites wouldn't be able to get away with their bullshit. What did leftists do once the problem of pollution became big enough? They had their little faggy protests, of course making sure not to be TOO violent lest they hurt someone and forcing the common people to pay taxes while making sure not to anger their rich daddy's too much. Once again capitalism seeks to supply demand, and if the demand to stop being fucking cunts is big enough, they won't have a choice in supplying that demands. Leftist soyboys think having their little petitions on twitter (back when it was soyboy central) will resolve all problems, while performing no action to incentivize change and still buying all harmful products, like fast fashion, apple and all the other big companies that leftists complain about.
Nowadays leftoids organize on tiktok, spending their days bitching about society's problems for likes or whatever, laying in bed, scrolling through tiktok, buying fast fashion brands while complaining about child labour, in the end, leftoids deserve rape.


 >>/115367/
> Those "incentives" are better than the nothingness of socialist economies
Your head is so far up your ass you didn't even realize I said absolutely nothing about socialism.
> I can't predict that
Then base your assumption on the current knowledge we have instead of praying to the sci-fi gods.
> but leaving the system open to innovation from private individuals and rewarding those who solve the biggest problems is probably a good idea
The system is open to innovation from private billionaires and rewards those who help them destroy or living environment and resources for their short term gain.
Sustaniable solutions are never the most remunerative option because they're an investment for the distant future.
By the time the Earth will be too unlivable to not warrant immediate action it will already be too late, and no there is no future utopia in space.
> it does seem that humans are also very adaptable
It does not. Our species is extremely young and it's already showing clear signs of decline and a lackluster project for our near future. Flies and ants are highly adaptable, not us.
> Alex Jones is how I'd imagine every working class man to be in a proper right wing, masculine society
A society of Youtube talking heads. 

 >>/115370/
None, this is hell.

 >>/115371/
> Your head is so far up your ass you didn't even realize I said absolutely nothing about socialism.
Offer an economic model alternative to the capitalism which you so despise that will solve the issue of excessive consumption, environmental decline, and pollution while still being able to outcompete your geopolitical rivals. 
> Then base your assumption on the current knowledge we have instead of praying to the sci-fi gods.
Your scientists wrote a paper about how the Earth is dying, boohoo, time to cry about it and demand societal collapse because a tree died.
> The system is open to innovation from private billionaires
Neither Musk nor Bezos nor Gates nor Altman nor Huang were billionaires when they started out. Are you jealous of their success because of their ability to solve problems is better than yours? You sound like those dorks who seethe about the kid in class who is just really damn good at Maths and I hate him. I guess we should make it so no one can be successful so I don't have to be jealous, right?
> rewards those who help them destroy or living environment and resources for their short term gain.
The possibility for them to exploit these short term gains are coming from the demands of common people, like you. Stop eating processed meat and jacking off to hentai on your iPhone 27 MaxTron if you wish to end this excessive depletion of our resources.
> Sustaniable solutions are never the most remunerative option because they're an investment for the distant future.
They will be if the resources become scarce enough, or if the demand becomes high enough. Sustainable solutions are also a concept that exist within a society that hasn't yet progressed past a certain technological level, let's say we still used steam engines and scientists tell you that coal is a limited resource, so in your pathetic soyboy brain you start freaking out because you can't envision a future where we move past the use of coal, that's you right now. (we can't let billionaires continue being created because le bad and I can't acknowledge that technology advances otherwise it would defeat my entire anti-capitalist narrative that relies entirely on the point that there is no future sci-fi utopia and we're stuck here so we must degrowth to save the planet which we will never escape from).
> Our species is extremely young and it's already showing clear signs of decline and a lackluster project for our near future. 
Humanity has fallen because a man is rich, it's over. We're dying out and no I won't let you convince me that we aren't, it's over for us, we need to kill the economy and let Chinkoids rape us because I'm scared and I said so.
Maybe billions will die, but at least we might get somewhere in the end. Maybe AI will outcompete humanity to the point where we become irrelevant and die out, much like our ancestral species. In the end it seems to me that leftist ideology is dying out largely because of where technology is headed, which is making it increasingly difficult for any society which isn't hard right to compete. The common people will suffer because of this, greatly, as those on the lower IQ levels are no longer relevant, and I don't really care about them.

 >>/115366/
That's a good point, actually. I never thought of it like that. On one side you have flowery writing about perfume and asthetics, and on the other you have autistic walls of text about politics and psychology.
We are all Kennedi. We are all Tyler Durden.

 >>/115368/
> What did leftists do once the problem of pollution became big enough? They had their little faggy protests, of course
That's common with leftists. They don't actually do anything, they just complain until someone else fixes the problem. Unironically.

 >>/115368/
> What did leftists do once the problem of pollution became big enough? They had their little faggy protests, of course making sure not to be TOO violent lest they hurt someone and forcing the common people to pay taxes while making sure not to anger their rich daddy's too much. Once again capitalism seeks to supply demand, and if the demand to stop being fucking cunts is big enough, they won't have a choice in supplying that demands. Leftist soyboys think having their little petitions on twitter (back when it was soyboy central) will resolve all problems, while performing no action to incentivize change and still buying all harmful products, like fast fashion, apple and all the other big companies that leftists complain about.
This is so well written that I'm gonna cum.

thumbnail of 1442957852608.jpg
thumbnail of 1442957852608.jpg
1442957852608 jpg
(17.72 KB, 445x331)
 >>/115379/
> Offer an economic model alternative to the capitalism which you so despise that will solve the issue of excessive consumption, environmental decline, and pollution while still being able to outcompete your geopolitical rivals
Read Pentti Linkola's "Can Life Prevail?".
> Your scientists wrote a paper about how the Earth is dying, boohoo, time to cry about it and demand societal collapse because a tree died
Sounds a lot more realistic than worshipping nonexistent scientists inventing a nonexistent panacea to solve all the world's issues just because you prayed very hard.
> Neither Musk nor Bezos nor Gates nor Altman nor Huang were billionaires when they started out
And I suppose you're the next one to join them, right? 
The world will never run out of mediocre and amoral idiots who dream big just because their saints said it's possible on tv while they waste their life drinking booze in bumfuck Omaha. 
The only thing that sets you apart from them is that you spend your days here, explaining your teen-brained ideology to anons while jacking off to communist lolitas. 
Honestly if we started betting on who will rope first in this thread you would be my winning horse, you're the only one who runs faster than the troons.
Nobody is asking Musk to own four aicrafts.
Everything they do is primarily in their own interest.
> They will be if the resources become scarce enough
They're already scarce enough. Agriculture, public health and safety and commercial fishing are already being devastated by ecological collapse and generating enormous economical losses.
Keeping perpetually sick patients in the clinic is more remunerative than eliminating the sickness.
> muh AI
> muh space travel
> muh benevolent millionaires
> muh scientific industrial faith
You're completely detached from reality.
Letting you have unrestricted internet access was your caretakers' biggest failure.


 >>/115386/
> Read Pentti Linkola's "Can Life Prevail?".
Sure. I probably won't enjoy it though since it just looks like your typical environmental fearmongering about the end of the world shit. I suspect people who are obsessed with climate change have a fetish for fear.
> Sounds a lot more realistic than worshipping nonexistent scientists inventing a nonexistent panacea to solve all the world's issues just because you prayed very hard.
There is no alternative. We don't live in a world that is free of competition, which is necessary for degrowth to ever be possible, you can bitch and moan about the end of the world all you want but it won't change the reality you live in. Also how would the average leftist be able to survive without an iPhone, that's ridiculous to even think about. 
You also have to acknowledge the point that most excess consumption is not coming from those at the top, but those at the bottom, which you don't criticize. Those at the top exploit the demands of those at the bottom for their self benefit, but can they really be blamed for taking advantage of this?
>  explaining your teen-brained ideology to anons while jacking off to communist lolitas. 
Come on now, don't judge me for my tastes.
> Everything they do is primarily in their own interest.
This is true, but without a reward there is no incentive for innovation and growth, without growth there is economic stagnation. And yes in a communist system there are still those being rewarded, the central government typically and their corrupt buddies. 
The main problem for you and your ilk aren't the rich, it's humanities endless lust and demand, which is not possible to resolve. It will never end, no matter what. No matter what you do or bitch about, even you most likely have your own vices which you "pig out" on, you're corrupt just not smart.
> They're already scarce enough. Agriculture, public health and safety and commercial fishing are already being devastated by ecological collapse and generating enormous economical losses.
Keeping perpetually sick patients in the clinic is more remunerative than eliminating the sickness.
Time to eat ze bugs! I love talking about how the world is ending without knowing what the FUCK to do about it. Maybe if I throw canned soup on a painting it might fix it. Maybe I should try liking a tweet about environmental collapse on my iPhone 3732, that might do it.
> You're completely detached from reality.
Yep I guess nothing will ever change, we're trapped here and we will soon be running around in gas masks cannibalizing each other. I guess you're the enlightened one and I should listen to you.






I’ve never posted on a site like this before but I’m only here to let you guys know that Kennedi hasn’t changed or moved on at all….

I’m assuming she doesn’t have a boyfriend anymore considering the fact that she spent her entire summer stalking and copying some of the people who cut ties with her / she accused of copying her (back in 2020-2021)…

4 years later and she still isn’t over them… she actively lurks and copies these four people which is very hypocritical of her.. watches the same specific / obscure films right after these people have logged them, rates albums in the same order (some of these albums aren’t rated by anyone else or by less than 10 users) so it’s extremely obvious who she went through and ken isn’t really smooth with it or hiding it… 

also she used to copy Jenny who has been into perfume since 2017, and has always had a red-pink-cream colored aesthetic. but lately ken has been posting grey/white posts which is the aesthetic of all four people she’s currently obsessed with. on fragrantica she put the exact same scents in her favorites as one of the people being stalked by her… she picked the same specific horror movie etc etc…


my point is that she’s still extremely problematic and I wouldn’t be surprised if she still checks this board to this day… from what I have observed she must be so extremely bored and have so much time in her hands to frequently look up people from her past and lazily steal their interests, media collection, aesthetic…

anyways , you guys should stop accusing / harassing people just because you think they are copying / want to be like ken.. it doesn’t matter if they do, because she herself copies others all the time for years… she just gets away with it because she’s popular… and let’s not forget ken started this trend of bullying people off the internet because they happen to be into the same things or discovered something through her (which should be ok), I get the trauma from the psycho 4chan girls who actually wanted to be her like Alex. 

but those ppl kind of fed her ego and now she loves the idea of everyone being obsessed with her and everyone wanting to be her because she’s a narcissistic triple leo

her entire taste in experimental films as well as her perfume poetry + interest in literature and psychology are all fake and stolen from one person. she talks like this person, posts similar stuff and their tumblr blogs are similar too now… 

if you strip away the copied interests, media, fake personality and taste, kennedi is nothing but a pretentious attention-seeking music nerd from new carolina

 >>/115838/
 >>/115846/
 >>/115848/
> this is my first time posting here
> proceeds to make the same post as done the last thread in the same exact schizotranny writing style with the same identical literallywho accusations based on nothing
I assume you’re one of the few "women" called out for having stalked Ken and trying to turn the tables since you know this is a public arena and she can’t defend herself. You know her post exposing you for copying and pasting her writing is still public right? Take your meds, because no one here knows what you’re talking about and you look insane trying to push this narrative when all evidence points to this not being true.

 >>/115851/

I bet you haven’t even fact-checked anything from my messages or you must be ken trying to ignore and get away with everything I’ve said. 

like I’ve mentioned before, it’s easy to see it for yourself. but if ur that lazy ill make sure to screenshot every proof i can find so u won’t have an excuse anymore to be this delusional.

it’s also funny that you assume I’m one of the targeted people just because I know what kind of awful person she really is. believe it or not, but she isn’t that likable at all, outside of this site ken has made a lot of enemies. you guys always wonder why her friends unfollowed and left her, but you don’t wanna believe it’s because of her toxicity and narcissism. you keep telling yourself ken wouldn’t do these things like look who’s mentally ill here? being obsessed with this false image you have of a complete stranger… 

the exposed person you’re talking about isn’t me but i used to be in a server with her (only for a short while), and followed her on tumblr as well. 

she made a public tumblr post on Ken’s screenshot explaining it wasn’t her. linked her actual fragrantica in the post, and had a few irls on tumblr who said that ken’s screenshots were either photoshopped or someone else being behind the account pretending to be this girl and doing all these things to her mutuals to ruin her reputation. because they had proof of traveling with her for a whole week while she got accused of something else by another mutual. 

if you were actually there around that time, or have followed this person, you would know that she would have people copy her a lot, and someone (or multiple people) might’ve used her profile names for weird behavior in order to make her lose her friends…

also more proof that you only know about ken-lore from this board is that you keep mentioning “tranny” while the four people in question are all cis. there never was a transgender, those were rumors as well


 >>/115846/
> because shes a narcissistic triple leo
cant make this shit up lmao you resorted to consulting stars to try to drag ken down because all else you have is your own delusions of her targeting you? youre clearly mentally ill though so i pity you enough to give you some advice.
1. tranny leave
2. i guarantee shes not the one posting about you. if youre talking about the long posts clearly written by a woman a few threads back that was obviously not her for a lot of different reasons. dont say she bullied you off the internet when all she did was make a post about how you were word for word copying her writing like  >>/115851/ said. 
3. you never personally knew ken and you feel unfairly targeted by her and anons for calling you out for copying and stalking her. consider the fact that no one whos been consistently accused of that has turned out to be innocent. assuming you actually are innocent though, then why do you keep closer tabs on ken than anyone itt does? who the fuck are all these random close and old friends of hers you keep bringing up and why do you know who they are? 
4. try to remember youre not special either and your gay little "art" communities are built on the same few people copying the same other people so its inevitable for two people to separately find these SOOPER OBSCUR RARE things. most of the pretentious shit shes watching is with friends who watched it before her. think of how you found something then ask yourself if its more likely she found it in the same way or if shes actually obsessed with keeping tabs on you in the way you are with her.
5. she hasnt kept a public persona in years. theres no reason to care even if what youre saying was somehow true. you won, right? you get the attention and she doesnt, so why cry about her? 
6.  if youre so close in proximity to her why not just fucking confront her yourself?
7. ultimately do you really think if she was obsessed with you shed be so obvious about it in the way youre making it out to be considering shes already publicly called you out for acting like a damn freak?
also try to stop talking in third person and going into so much detail if you dont want to make it obvious

 >>/115868/
> bet you haven't fact checked
Lmao as opposed to you pulling this shit out of your ass? Why are you even here? You made the same posts in multiple threads about her and now you're pretending you've never posted here before too. Ken fucked off and now she's chilling with friends while you're still seething about her years later. Sad!

Women's greatest enemies are other women. Never underestimate the lengths a psychofoid will go to humiliate women she sees as getting more attention than her. Guarantee you this poster wouldn't give a fuck about Ken if not for feeling like she was more deserving of the attention. 
> b-b-b-but i like the same tryhard media as ken and SHE gets all the attention it's not fair you're supposed to hate her i promise SHE'S the one copying ME and MY friends who totallyarentinsane

 >>/115868/
> if you were actually there around that time, or have followed this person, you would know that she would have people copy her a lot, and someone (or multiple people) might’ve used her profile names for weird behavior in order to make her lose her friends…
you know people have also done this to ken more than any other girl on earth right?

 >>/115870/

again, this proves that you guys don’t even wanna listen or know anything about ken, the exposed person, or her old friends at all…

first of all, I used to be good friends with ken. 
second of all, everyone ken has called out so far is cis, there is no transgender.
and this person from that fragrantica post has already been cleared. everyone already knows she’s innocent.
I don’t want to name-drop anyone so I keep saying her old friends, they have moved on and I don’t want you guys harassing them. mainly talking about A. and also J. and L.

I bet you were a baby when all of this happened so never mind. no one copied Ken’s fragrantica poetry… ken is actively stalking her old friends and taking recs from them. ask anyone outside of this website who’s in this circle

 >>/115872/

I haven’t made any post before until today but im glad more people are trying to expose her lol, maybe it was one of the ppl im referring to. 

also Ken can’t have any other haters? it’s got to be the same person! and I always take this stranger’s side because I fetishize her and because I’m a NEET loser. 

reminiscing to the time when her own tumblr friends told me how awful she is and the stuff she’s done irl, how they actually hated her because she was being fake to them as well and lied all the time…

 >>/115875/


I don’t need attention for the media I consume or my aesthetic unlike her… she calls people out for having watched the same movie while she does the same and takes it to a whole new level… just hypocritical behavior

 >>/115838/
> posting from iphone
> I’m assuming she doesn’t have a boyfriend anymore
Wrong, she got married and moved to San Francisco and travels from coast to coast.
> she used to copy Jenny who has been into perfume since 2017
Ken has a post detailing exactly how she got into perfume and says that friend told her about some bottle and got her into it. You call that copying?
> lately ken has been posting grey/white posts which is the aesthetic of all four people she’s currently obsessed with
Do you not see the irony in accusing Ken of being obsessed with you guys because she likes black and white, THE most common combination of colors in existence which is ALSO liked by "all four" of you? 
> she must be so extremely bored and have so much time in her hands to frequently look up people from her past and lazily steal their interests, media collection, aesthetic
Because that isn't what's happening. You're accusing her of doing the same thing you're claiming you resent her for. 
> you guys should stop accusing / harassing people just because you think they are copying / want to be like ken
This isn't happening.
> it doesn’t matter if they do, because she herself copies others all the time for years
Oh, now I understand why you're making these posts. Cope and sneed. It's not enough to be happy that she's no longer active, you have to try to rewrite history and frame her as a psycho obsessed stalker for *checks notes* posting certain colors, liking perfume for years, and watching art movies as usual?


 >>/115879/
> same exact typing style
> same exact iPhone ellipses
> same exact vague accusations
> same exact allusions to knowing more than you're letting on
No need to pretend to be another person. And again, when was the last time she "called out" anyone? Fucking years ago and you're still seething over it?


 >>/115883/

how do u know so much about her ? if she’s moved on why would she wanna update people who still lurk her endchan board. 

and the tumblr aesthetic is being copied in a way where you guys even accused someone of reblogging her letterboxd profile pic, while she changed it to that picture after they reblogged it. and compare her blog to angelica’s…. similar pictures, same types of posts, same everything…

 >>/115886/

whatever makes you sleep better at night lol. and it’s not about the callout post, others have brought it up again so I had some explaining to do… it’s about the fact that she actively stalks people she used to have a problem with and steals their entire lists of good movies and music. 

maybe you’re too blind to see that every song/album has A, O, or L’s user in its list way before ken added them and this happened a few weeks ago so I don’t believe she has moved on

 >>/115889/
It was confirmed by a friend of hers on /mu/ last year who provided updates about RYM users, all of which were confirmed. 
> she changed it to that picture after they reblogged it
Reverse image search that image and you will discover that tumblr and pinterest are infested with it. And why are you pretending to know the exact date Ken changed her avatar?
> angelica
Ken is friends with her. Angelica is literally the mother of the child of one of Ken's oldest friends, who came here a few threads ago to defend Ken. Maybe you're the one who knows nothing.



 >>/115894/
exactly my point, that picture is everywhere yet you guys attacked this user for having it on their blog? they couldn’t have predicted she would use it as her profile pic one day right? 

why are things always considered “creepy” until you find out ken does it first / too




 >>/115902/

it makes sense to think she’s behind all of this again because everything I’ve told her in private, somehow ended up on boards like these… things only she would know.

and lately problematic things have been happening again which is why I felt like checking here and assuming she’s back to being toxic.


 >>/115906/
What the fuck are you talking about? Why not just message her if you personally know her and aren't just having a tranny tantrum? The only women who have been brought up here by name are her friend’s girlfriend and Angelica. Nothing personal has been posted about anyone else. Are you just throwing anything out against her hoping it sticks now that so much of what you said fell through?

 >>/115908/

I can’t reach out to her because she has blocked me on everything because I am friends with the four people I’ve mentioned before. 

also love that you guys keep overusing one slur over and over again lol.. all these ppl I’ve mentioned are cis so ur not hurting anyone sorry buddy






















 >>/115955/
honestly idt it's her. i doubt that she knows about this place or how to get here and she deleted her tumblr 3 years ago and cut off all her friends after the drama in 2021 from what i've heard she's completely offline



 >>/115960/
i don't but it's pretty obvious. if you try to look up her tumblr in google it says "-deactivated2021" next to her url which is the same year when all the drama with ken and the others happened. her mutual friends don't follow her/post about her anymore and all her accounts are gone including her spotify, lastmfm, and youtube. i didn't know her well but she didn't seem like the type of person who'd know about this place, she's kind of a normie when it comes to online spaces


 >>/115965/
there is no drama. these two people aren’t interesting and there isn’t much info on them. just someone on here who likes to bring up random drama from 3 years ago while kennedi and those people are all offline living a healthier life right now


…I thought Angelica was basically schizophrenic? A lot of her poetry and writings are so overly flowery that it’s hardly decipherable. Some of it is so flowery it’s basically gibberish and reads like a thesaurus… similar to Ken’s fragrance reviews. I’m surprised she’s a mother on top of that? I thought she was in grad school or something. And wasn’t Lily that “shirtscent” person who was copying Ken’s fragrance reviews word for word? From what I can see, Ken mostly copies Jenny and Angelica (Angelica’s style of writing, and Jenny’s fashion, film taste, and collage style). Also, who is jasmine?




 >>/115964/
> i dont know 
> but if you look up her tumblr 
But why do you know this literallywho's tumblr? No one here knows who the fuck any of these people are except Ken lmao. It's obvious you're the samefagging harpy from earlier still trying to shitstir and likely this Lily person themself.


 >>/115971/
if you read through the board you’d know now that angelica isn’t schizophrenic and isn’t a mother. and lily wasn’t behind the fragrantica reviews, it was someone else catfishing as her to get her into trouble. and yes, ken has been copying angelica and jenny but no one else here wants to admit it


 >>/115971/
> I thought Angelica was basically schizophrenic?
> I’m surprised she’s a mother on top of that? I thought she was in grad school or something
Well, the father of her child even came here and said she was crazy, and she eventually lost custody of their kid after she took them and fled to Japan. As far as I know she is still in grad school and living in Japan.

 >>/116005/
So you really do know nothing and just want to drag Ken down based on little tidbits picked up here and there, most likely from people who have stalked and wronged Ken. See Angelica's baby daddy confirming that Ken is a good person that people like to lie about and that he does have a kid with Angelica and paid $60,000 to keep her away from him and their kid: 
 >>/80485/
 >>/80869/
 >>/80870/
 >>/80876/
You can stop continuously changing your story and leave now.


 >>/116010/
holy shit I completely forgot Angelica used to skinwalk Kennedi. but isn’t kennedi skinwalking angelica right now? all I know is that angelica and kennedi aren’t friends anymore. also why is the dad of angelica’s child posting on endchan like nigga go take care of the baby if you are better than her



What a mess. Not that I ever expect anything other than that.

I’m not "serialjune," but in old posts I’ve already made it pretty obvious who I am to anyone who could put the pieces together, so I’ll be the one to say something. Kennedi is a nice and honest woman. This isn't a compliment, it's just how she is, often to her detriment. Unfortunately, with being a nice and honest person comes a guaranteed degree of receiving various forms of abuse. I can say with full confidence from personal experience that every amount of “drama” I have seen to be associated with Ken has been the result of someone else’s deep-seated paranoia at best or perversion at worst. The truth is that she wouldn't hurt a fly. I will not say anything more about her as a person onward.

The seemingly random women mentioned in this thread are being mentioned because, in order to clear the air, someone would have to reveal themselves as knowing more than the run of the mill anon passing through. I have good reason to believe that their names were chosen deliberately as an attempt to lure Ken out of the woodwork and to try to falsely prove that Ken is guilty of something she is not. Since most people lurking and posting here don’t actually know who these people are, it's easy to say anything. Ken has been friends with the women mentioned for a very long time. For the sake of everyone’s privacy, I will not elaborate or specify, only state this along with the fact that there is no bad blood between any of them, and especially not anything as childish as copycat accusations. So, please don't bother them.

I don’t know anything about this Lily person and she has never once been brought up by Ken, so I can’t comment on that except to say Ken isn’t obsessed with her like this one anon is insisting. What I'd like to know is how a post where she named no one and only showed that someone was copying and pasting her writing was "harassment." That doesn't make sense, considering no one was identified, and if the person you're defending really wasn't behind it, then what would this matter? Is it really important enough to bring up so many years later with the additional blow of fabricating stories about other people as well?

I recommend being suspicious of posters mentioning anyone believed to be friends or enemies of Ken, especially if it’s in favor of a specific narrative. If Lily is here and reading this, know that there is no reason to be paranoid except of people who pose an equal threat to Ken herself. 

 >>/116014/
> I completely forgot Angelica used to skinwalk Kennedi. 
> but isn’t kennedi skinwalking angelica right now?
Neither of these things are true or have ever been true. Both of them are living completely different lives from however you're imagining it for the better.

 >>/116005/
 >>/116011/
 >>/116015/
 >>/116016/
Funny, but kindly fuck off.



 >>/116024/
This is a nice try but it's really obvious that you're larping and have no idea what you're talking about. A bunch of things you've asserted regarding Kennedi and her relationships with these people I know for a fact are untrue. You are not friends with Kennedi, you don't talk to her, and you aren't familiar with the other people being mentioned here either, so I don't know why you're pretending that you are. Really weird post.


 >>/116042/
No, and if anything you are the larper pretending to know more than you let on in order to get others to share more and paint a different picture of reality to suit your agenda. I do personally know her and I can tell that I've hit a nerve with you and again you’re relying on the average poster here not knowing any better than to automatically believe you over me unless I dish out personal details to prove something. So I will reveal some harmless, verifiable facts that I know in order to demonstrate how long and how well I've known Ken, just to make the bad actors here impotent: One of the women mentioned in this thread, Jenny, has been married to Ken’s friend (whose initials are AV) for years, and they’ve all known each other since Ken was in her mid teens. They met through music and Facebook. They are still friends. The husband is an ESL teacher in a foreign country. Here's even more verifiable proof that I’m telling the truth: Serialjune's real initials are JR. Angelica's last name starts with a G.

Nothing YOU have said can be verified and has shifted throughout the thread, but everything I have said can be verified by those claiming to be closer to Ken than they actually are. I know I am telling the truth, so I am invincible while you and the others have to try to cover the cracks in your narratives and panic when caught. You are the one who doesn’t know shit except what comes out your ass.




 >>/107881/
i have the feeling im the only teenage girl on this entire board but i found this site a bit ago and when i found this girls threads i was super blown away, i love her fashion and music taste and how she presents herself online. is she still active on any of those social medias, or did she leave the internet basically entirely?









do you guys think ken has had some sort of vocal training? her voice used to sound so wobbly, stressed/nervous and way louder before 2018-2019. but in her recent (covid) street interview and the camera man song she posted on her story, her voice sounds way cuter, softer, girlier and melodious





















Does anyone else think she grew up with a human growth hormone deficiency and that's why she looks so young still? There‘s a pic of her at 11 with classmates of the same age somewhere and she’s over a foot shorter than all of them and shaped like a stick figure while everyone else has filled out curves already. She looks 7 in it. And she's wearing a dress or skirt. Anybody have it? It's been posted before.









 >>/117642/
Women don't really have any genuine political beliefs beyond some virtue signalling shit they do to fit in with their fellow arthoes, they mostly just do what daddy tells them because they're dumb and can't think for themselves.






 >>/117910/
I first heard about her because I know someone into crypto who used to talk to her occasionally a few years ago. Seeing how many friends she has who are into crypto now is making me wonder if she is. or her boyfriend










thumbnail of 1601242966773.jpg
thumbnail of 1601242966773.jpg
1601242966773 jpg
(123.83 KB, 1080x1129)
> Back to when I was a teenager, lusting for death I'd see you in those imageboards, your scrawny body laid out on some cheesy rug, in some slimy house in North Carolina, posing for some white neet with a thin mustache who told you he was an autist.

 >>/109067/
most of my friends are like this, it's because they like camp. if you pay attention to the celebs they ironically worship it's psychos like lindsay lohan and the rap they listen to is ultra-absurd shit like rxk nephew. also kennedy dresses like a creepy ghost baby and loves anaïs nin, i'm really not suprised she likes weird dark exploitative shit. does she like sontag?











 >>/119100/
One time a friend of mine DM'd her "you're cute" on instagram and she replied with an extremely long winded analysis of his entire account culminating in a list of all the Lucky Star merch she used to own as a teen.




 >>/119287/
She was extreme autismo 
> messaged her one day randomly
> anon I'm so happy someone's talking to me BS 
> I wasn't her orbiter just fucking around 
> knew she liked history or some shit 
> start dropping random things related to that 
> she goes off on a rant about the civil war 
> this bitch is citing sources and shit 
> I troll her and purposely say wrong info 
> she sperged even harder
> messages flying at me 
> tell her I'm sorry I'm not from the US I never took a US history class
> sperging pauses 
> oh anon I'm so sorry
> she starts being really nice to me, apologies and shit 
> kek













































 >>/122246/
How does knowing that a girl as dainty and cute as Ken has gone down to her knees to suck some dude's cock with that cute little mouth of hers and has moaned like a bitch in heat while getting pounded and creampied not make you want to rope bros?



















 >>/122674/
> number 2 of the same 5 comments people make about her
im a loser for still frequenting this place but is it just new posters thinking they are having original thoughts or old posters just repeating the same thing

















 >>/107881/
Is Kennedi's family aware of these threads and her internet presence? I can't imagine them being okay with it.I wonder if they were ever contacted back in the day. Same goes for her IRL friends, if she had followed any of them on her personal social medias.



 >>/123719/
Her family and friends are aware. When Gilbert Raborg the pedrophile was harassing her a decade ago he doxxed her dad and got 8chan anons to harass him too. Her friends have posted here before to defend her, and IRL friends of hers have been creepshotted by endchan posters.


Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


461 replies | 58 file
New Reply on thread #107881
Max 20 files0 B total