/agatha2/ - E-Girl Purgatory

e-girl gossip & drama


New Reply on thread #70555
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]


thumbnail of Look at it. Its magnificent isnt it?.mp4
thumbnail of Look at it. Its magnificent isnt it?.mp4
Look at it. Its... mp4
(13.9 MB, 640x360 h264)
Previously:  >>/18815/

Yes, I hate women, I just do, and I'm tired of pretending that I don't.

All the pain, all the suffering I have ever experienced can be ultimately traced back to the female race.

Elliot was right, I was in touch with humanity before women and sex came into the picture, before I hit puberty.

It hit me yesterday like a train that the happiest period of my life was when women existed somewhere there on the periphery of my mind. Like unsettling premonition, a bitter taste of things to come.

"So simple" - I thought, - "How could I not notice this before?"

And an answer straight away - "That's what trauma does to you, your mind tries to sweep it under the rug of consciousness"

Yes, now I finally, finally get it - I was brutally violated. No more running away, no more hiding.

You NEED to end this.
thumbnail of gamergirl.png
thumbnail of gamergirl.png
gamergirl png
(1.07 MB, 1483x554)
Anons, if I can offer you one piece of advice as a guy in his early 30s it's this: Don't date women who play a lot of video games. Just... don't. Normal women are vastly less likely to cheat, vastly less likely to have a huge partner count, vastly less likely to be mentally ill messes.

I get that you "want a girl who shares your hobby", but it isn't worth it. Women who share your hobbies will turn you into a raging misogynist.
 >>/70562/
Very true anon. gamer girls, streamers, art hos, scene sluts or any "I'm so different" type should be avoided. Doubly so if they only have male friends. good for a smash and dash only. Find a girl that likes normal girl shit like Netflix and Taylor swift and you might get lucky she's only crazy in the normal way most women are
thumbnail of download.jpg
thumbnail of download.jpg
download jpg
(24.02 KB, 778x1000)
What if you not only hate women but everyone, including animals, plants, etc.? It's over? What is the endgame of this?
Honestly, some of the posts here sound like false flag strawmen that r*ddit users would make just so they can screenshot and try to make it seem like there are a ton of evil misogynists on these forums.

Regardless, it's been rather amusing recently to see women utterly shit themselves when they reach 30+ and realize they get less attention than 20-25yo women. It mainly exposes two things:
1) Women are, again, utter crybullies. I probably wrote about this before, but when it's lonely men, they have ZERO empathy. "Life's not fair." "Too bad." "That's biology.", etc.. When women are "winning", and aren't the ones affected, they are merciless and constantly on the offensive.
BUT. As soon as it's them experiencing ANY issue, even if it's 1% of what men go through, suddenly they go into full victim mode, demand everyone support them, and rage at anyone who disagrees.
2) Women should not be taken seriously. They will use social shaming and false accusations without good reason. They will manipulate everything into sounding more in their favor. Just look at the manipulative shit they say:
> "Dating teenagers"
Only technically, since they're 18-19. But that doesn't even matter, since they still say it with 20-25yo women. It makes it sound like the topic is about 15yos or something, when it's not.
> "In high school or just out of high school"
Again, commonly said about 22yo+ women. Doesn't really mean anything besides shock value.
> "The man was X years old when she was born"
No actual reason, just some made up shit to make it sound worse
> Any implication that women in their 20s are "kids" "teens" "children", etc..
Once again, women are their own worst enemies. This time, infantilizing other women. Are they modern and empowered, or still immature at 25? Schrodinger's feminist.

It's also funny to see women rationalize. "Men go for younger women cause they wanna control and manipulate the poor innocent 22yos" Crazy how women's personality detector suddenly works.
 >>/72071/
Speaking of rationalizations, I've been meaning to make a post with advice for women:
The bad shit other women say about men when they get rejected, is complete bullshit. It's all lies to make themselves feel better. And it's always the same pattern:
> Men are intimidated by a woman's career
No, men do not care one way or the other about a woman's job. It's completely neutral, men do not care about social status bullshittery like women do. Career women just tend to be arrogant and controlling, and sometimes hold their career over men's head. It's just unpleasant to be around. Career women also tend to be 30yo+, which lowers their attractiveness. This plus the issues with rich women. All downsides, no upsides.
Oh and not to mention how women often act like the most basic shit everyone does is this huge achievement, and get mad when men don't worship them for it.
> Men can't handle making less than their gfs, their male ego wants to be the provider
No, men don't care about a woman's income. They just know that a richer woman will demand richererer men, so the "difficulty level" for that woman will be higher, for zero benefit. The ROI for dating her is just worse. Also, women talking about men's instinct to provide is just them trying to manipulate men into giving them free shit.
> Men are intimidated by tall women
Exact same thing as rich women's income. More demands for zero benefit.
> Men are intimidated by a woman's experience
No, men just don't like sluts. Also there isn't much to it to laying back and taking dick. There is no "experience".
> Men can't handle my curves\full figure\thickness\etc.
No, they just don't like fat chicks. Especially women who call themselves "thick" when they're actually fat.
 >>/72083/
ALSO. When it's older male celebrities dating women in their 20s, it pisses me off how women absolutely refuse to acknowledge that the celebrity's gf is the one benefiting from the relationship, not him.
It's not even a fucking relationship, it's a business contract. She gets to taste his income and social status, and he gets fresh pussy.
 >>/72071/
plebbit alert

> Dating teenagers
They are literally teenagers by definition "eightTEEN" "nineTEEN", not to mention them not having the emotional maturity having been in their last year of high school or fresh into college. Also I've never really seen women mention anything about women over 23 or so unless its a man whos double her age (i.e. her father's age) in which case that *is* an understandable concern.

It's an understandable concern regardless of whether the partner double the other's age is male or female.

One thing I've seen my female coworkers rage about is this new viral show called The Nevermets in which a 17 year old British boy is flying to India to meet his 26 year old e-gf. The women i know are outraged about it and how the situation was allowed to air.
 >>/72089/
> new viral show called The Nevermets in which a 17 year old British boy is flying to India to meet his 26 year old e-gf
huh? they made a reality show out of seamaxxing?
 >>/72093/
Yeah its been huge on reality television recently especially dating ones. On youtube look up “90 day fiancee Big Ed and Rose” which started the wave and its this obese american pervert and some shitskin gook looking for a green card. Funniest shit
 >>/72089/
> They are literally teenagers by definition
Yes, that's the problem, it's only by technicality. When people use "teenagers" colloquially, they usually mean something like 13-17, not 18/19. It's deliberately deceptive to make the man seem worse.
EVEN IF women were 100% right on this, which they aren't, just the fact that they'd be manipulative about it is wrong in itself.
> not having the emotional maturity
Then I guess we should raise the voting age for women. Problem solved. Heck, we should have her father pick out suitors for her, too. Since she's so unable to do it herself.
> partner double the other's age
Here's another one of those "rules" people come up with.
It really fucking reminds me of the "rules" women make up to get out of paying for dates
> oops whoever invites pays for everyone haha
> whoever earns more pays for everyone
Conveniently 99% of the time it's the man who fits these criteria. Fucking shit.
 >>/72089/
> partner double the other's age
Hey I have an idea. How about we institute a rule where a woman can't date a man who makes more than double her income. It's only fair, right? No fucking way women would actually accept this, naturally.
This one isn't a huge deal, but it kinda annoys me when women extend a word with the wrong letter. And I've only ever seen women do this.
For example, if you wanna extend the word "word", you'd type "wooooooord", but women always type it like "worddddddd".
Surely there's some psychological reason behind this.
 >>/72111/
hope u know teens doesn't mean exclusive to women lol. If some 19 year old boy was dating a 38 year old everyone would also be raising an eyebrow- regardless of gender.
 >>/72325/
I don't think it's a zoomer thing, I've seen women do this since like 2010. Maybe it's not exclusive to women, but I've personally never seen a man do it.
 >>/72328/
I don't think they would, since women aren't ACTUALLY mad about people being victims in age gap relationships, but that's not the point.
The point is that women are turbo mad because they're "losing" on something for once. Women do not give a fuck about victims, they only care about what benefits them, personally, at that time.
These threads make me wonder what kind of mental breakdown you guys had after a woman did not meet the requirements made up in your head. Just look for women graduated from standford or mit and problem solved
There is a rampant infestation of narcissism among women. Go to the DSM-5 definition of Narcissism Personality Disorder and look at the symptoms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorder
> A grandiose sense of self-importance (exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
Women are arrogant all the time ("Women can do anything a man can", overestimating abilities, no self awareness of her own weakness)
They often demand recognition for things men (and adults) just do normally, like being "independent", or paying your own bills.
> Preoccupation with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
Chasing Chads, idolizing retarded celebrities, watching retarded celebrity TV shows, watching rich people shows and projecting themselves onto the show. Constantly fishing for an ego boost with pics of themselves.
> Believing that they are "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
Women obsess over social status, social groups, cliques, etc. They also have insanely inflated egos, regardless of their own quality.
> Requiring excessive admiration
Attention whoring online, constantly fishing for compliments\attention from their bfs\husbands, and approval from society.
> A sense of entitlement (unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with their expectations)
Chasing Chads, entitlement is synonymous with women, female privilege in general, and how women shit themselves when they get ACTUAL equality, or something doesn't go their way.
> Being interpersonally exploitative (taking advantage of others to achieve their own ends)
Manipulating others. They do it all the time, whether it's simps or even their bfs\husbands.
> Lacking empathy (unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others)
Women have zero empathy, as established many times. They don't care about men's issues, and indeed go on the attack when they see male weakness. And they don't care about other women either, they only pretend to do it, purely to virtue signal.
> Often being envious of others or believing that others are envious of them
Women are constantly envious and jealous, often for no reason. They are also solipsistic and like to assign thoughts\beliefs to other people.
> Showing arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes
See the first point. Any time women are safe, they become very arrogant. However, when they are under the tiniest of risk, they instantly go into full victim mode.

Now look me in the eye and tell me this isn't 1:1 women. Am I wrong here?
 >>/72371/
I feel like this just applies to narcissistic women.. like this is how a narcissitic person acts but if all youve experienced is this then maybe youre not in the best of company/enviroment? No hate
 >>/72371/
I like how everyone is telling u these things apply to both men and women (like that worddd thing, victims in age gaps, narcissism) and u just refuse to believe it kek. You know you're too far gone when even an orbitting board is correcting you on these matters. I mean this sincerely, touch grass.
 >>/72435/
Correct. You can tell he's the same person by the r*ddit level writing style. I was a fool to reply despite him commenting "but men do it too" twice in a row.
I really should have known, they always repeat the same lines. I messed up, fellas.
 >>/72478/
> you're here shilling prime r/incel content.
True, but what you're doing isnt any better. The superficial, annoyingly unempathetic "both do it" is unhelpful, played out, and belongs in the r/inceltear echo chamber.
Women have been taking advantage of patriarchal norms that have deemed them harmless and non predatorial for quite some time now, one such manifestation of that is the general perception on age gap relationships. Like man, you know both genders aren't equally stigmatised in age gap dating, you know people call women who do it cougars, you know men who do it are gross pedros. Yet you still throw in this low effort 1 sentence post >>/72328/ just because. Why bro
 >>/72488/
 >>/72490/
Brothers, you are right, but don't reply to r*ddit bait posts.
I also recommend eliminating terms like "unhelpful" and referring to subr*ddits with the "r/" text from your vocabulary.
 >>/72511/
> I also recommend eliminating terms like "unhelpful" and referring to subr*ddits with the "r/" text from your vocabulary.
Why?
 >>/72561/
Well, first of all, because using retarded language makes you more retarded. In this case, more like a r*ddit user.
But more importantly, taking over language is a big way that this SJW shit has taken hold on people.
Do not use their language. Do not speak or act like them. Do not fold to their retarded demands.
 >>/73497/
relationships and sex just give you up close exposure to the reality of women, which is a much more compelling reason to hate them than some bitter resentment due to lack of sex
 >>/73537/
> then why is there more of a correlation with misogyny in KHHVs than men who date?
Show me literally one study establishing this
 >>/73537/
Studies will show it's correlated more with bad relationships with their mom, care givers, and early childhood adverse experiences. In turn this affects how they function socially and view women.
thumbnail of gd.jpg
thumbnail of gd.jpg
gd jpg
(126.96 KB, 1080x1297)
Suddenly women understand gold diggers lmao. (FYI they understand, they just pretend not to.)
And yes, it's still deeply amusing me how post-Wall women absolutely shit themselves over this kind of thing.
thumbnail of bruh.jpg
thumbnail of bruh.jpg
bruh jpg
(216.92 KB, 753x919)
> dyed hair
> retarded haircut
> preened eyebrows
> piercings
> tattoos
> choker
> fat
> ring light
> excessive makeup
> ear gauges
Every time. Why do they always look like that.
 >>/73546/
Replying to anything disagreeing with your views on an anonymous image board is a waste of time mostly, so stop trying to police what people do choose to reply to.
i just wanna say it's 1:39am on the east coast and i am beating off to screenshots from years ago, just like every night. i haven't even observed a decent attractive woman online or offline since 2018. i tried filling the void by paying for some onlyfans but women even scam on there, never posting or hiding low-quality crap behind paywalls.
i've watched every video made by my favorite porn studios, many of which have been defunct for over a decade.
i just don't know where to go from here. i know AI can do good things and make new fap fuel from all the thousands of e-girl pictures and videos i've been collecting for the last 15 years. but i need it good and strong. i need the AI to basically just become these women somehow, as they were in these photos and videos. become them and make fresh porn for me forever. i need the satisfaction or i will die.
 >>/75965/
also, many ruined by husbands and children. stupid fucking whores posting that stuff online, ruining my gooning fantasy forever. if you women do that, log off forever and get that stuff away from me. i will go very insane in a very bad way if you do not stay my porn slut for life, in my mind anyway.
thumbnail of 1691445447059872.webm
thumbnail of 1691445447059872.webm
1691445447... webm
(2.52 MB, 492x875 vp9)
 >>/75965/
> i haven't even observed a decent attractive woman online or offline since 2018
you might be surprised at how differently your perception of women's attractiveness would change if you were to ameliorate your fried dopamine receptors.
> i tried filling the void by paying for some onlyfans but women even scam on there, never posting or hiding low-quality crap behind paywalls
you're literally trying to close a hole by digging into it more and more: why would you expect your lot to be different?
 >>/75967/
> many ruined by husbands and children. stupid fucking whores posting that stuff online, ruining my gooning fantasy forever
blaming people for your own problems is pathetic.
 >>/75967/
It's very rare for me to say this, but you might genuinely have some kind of addiction or issue regarding porn and the women in it. You're acting like those Japanese idol fans who can't stand it when they find out an idol has a boyfriend. You gotta stop thinking like that and fix that mentality in a psychological way. Maybe an actually good therapist would help. (99% aren't good)
My personal advice to you is to up your standards for the women you look at. Shit like Onlyfans and even egirls is the bottom of the barrel. Good luck.

Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


52 replies | 13 file
New Reply on thread #70555
Max 20 files0 B total